The controversial India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) has once again received negative publicity among Singaporeans, and this time the Government has come forward to debunk the misconceptions. This is the second time the Government has done so in nine months.

The Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) said in a statement on Thursday (27 August) that there is no provision in the free trade agreement between both nations that allows Indian nationals to be given citizenship in Singapore.

“It is not true that under CECA, Indian nationals can come to Singapore and become permanent residents and citizens. There is no such provision in CECA,” MTI said in a statement.

The statement was released following media queries on whether the free trade agreement will open up the possibility of allowing Indian nationals automatic access to citizenship, permanent resident status and employment in the Republic.

This was the second time in nine months that the Government has come forward to clear up misconception that the public has in regards to CECA, which came into effect in 2005.

Earlier in November 2019, Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Singapore had explained that the free trade agreement did not give Indian nationals unconditional access into the country.

He said this in response to a viral video of a man from India shouting profanities to a security guard at a condominium. The video caused much uproar from Singaporeans.

The Ministry of Home Affairs had later pointed out that the man had obtained his citizenship under the Family Ties scheme after he married a Singaporean woman.

Mr Chan had also said that time that claims of CECA costing Singaporeans job opportunities were aimed at arousing fear among the people during economic uncertainty.

MTI noted in its Thursday’s statement that Singaporeans are “understandably concerned” with competition from foreign professionals, managers and executives (PMEs) due to the current bleak economy and employment situation.

However, it added that it is “misleading” to assert that the number of Indian PMEs, especially intra-corporate transferees, solely or largely to CECA.

If that’s not all, MTI has also stated that it is not true that CECA requires Singapore to automatically give Employment Passes to PMEs originating from India.

“None of our free trade agreements, including Ceca, obliges us to automatically grant Employment Passes to any foreign national,” the Ministry said.

It added, “All foreign nationals applying for Employment Passes must meet our prevailing criteria, and all companies must comply with rules on fair hiring”.

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) revealed that there were 193,700 Employment Pass holders in the country as of December 2019. These passes were given to foreign PMEs, and their salary needs to be a minimum of S$3,900 a month and have the proper qualifications.

MTI noted that for those who wants to enter Singapore as an intra-corporate transferee under CECA, they must meet the current work pass rules.

It went on to add that intra-corporate transferees in the country have always been under 5 per cent of all Employment Pass holders in Singapore, and they come from different countries around the global, with Indian nationals making up only a small segment of it.

Despite Government’s clarification on the matter, netizens remain sceptical about the free trade agreement between Singapore and India. Penning their thoughts in the Facebook page of TODAY, many of them urged the Government to be honest with the people and not use different terms to “create different perception”. Some even asked the Government to clarify the benefits of CECA for Singapore, noting that they don’t see the benefits of the free trade agreement for the country.

They added that the Government is failing to see what is happening on the ground as some companies have a full department of foreign talents. As such, they pointed out that this leaves many Singaporeans “unemployed or sidelined”.

 

Others said that the Government official should take a walk at Changi Business Park, which the netizens now address as “Chennai Business Park”.

   

A large number of them also call for the Government to be transparent of CECA’s details. They explained that all terms of the agreement should be made public so the people can have a look at it.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
36 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

StanChart management head in Singapore arrested for blackmailing fellow management head

It was reported that Indian national Nagarajan Balajee, 35, was arrested and…

Will S’poreans speak up for others?

Will S’poreans speak up for others who’re oppressed? Tan Kin Lian.

港立法会外爆冲突警驱赶 林郑月娥称“有组织暴动”

香港群众为防堵“送中条例”修法在今日通过二读,聚集立法会外。但在下午约三时许警民爆发冲突,演变成流血骚乱,2014年“占中”景象重演。 据了解,由于集会群众不满政府仍未撤回上述修法而不肯离去。民间人权阵线发言人岑子傑表示,只有行政長官林郑月娥宣布撤回修法,集会才会结束。 不过约下午三时有示威者冲击警方防线,高喊“撤回”口号。警方则多次发射催泪弹、橡胶子弹和布袋弹,以及催泪喷剂等驱赶立法会周边的示威者,群众立即走避,但不少人转移阵地,占领周边添华道、夏悫道等道路。也有群众退往中环方向。 香港警务处处长卢伟聪谴责示威者行为不负责任“做法危险,可以杀人”,形容金钟一代废除混乱,由于防线被冲击,唯有用武器阻止“暴徒”。警方也呼吁当地民众切勿进入金钟一带。 不过民间人权阵线则强烈谴责警方以催泪弹、布袋弹和橡胶子弹攻击示威者,导致多人受伤甚至昏迷,并重申港人“没有骚乱”。而大部分示威者手无寸铁,仅有头盔、护目镜或手套等配备。 林郑月娥定义集会为“暴动” 另一方面,林郑月娥批评示威者破坏社会安宁、罔顾法纪,并指现场状况不是和平集会,而是公然、有组织地发动“暴动”。他指今早有人不顾市民安危,占据和堵塞马路、瘫痪交通,严重影响社会运作,以及多次冲击警方防线和作出危险可致命行为,包括放火、用削尖铁支和丢砖块攻击警察。 她也指每当有涉及中央与特区、内地和香港的议题,都会被部分人士挑起矛盾和纷争。 她也接受香港无线电视访问,并表示“说我卖港?我怎样卖港?我是这儿土生土长,与所有香港人一起成长,我对于这个地方的爱,令我作出不少个人牺牲”,一度哽咽。 不过,也有一些示威者抨击林郑月娥“失心疯”,也不认同林郑月娥说法。 香港地铁也依照警方要求,在晚上8时30分关闭金钟站。至晚上9时30分截稿为止,警方仍手持长盾,与在夏悫道设下路障的群众对峙,预料将有另一轮清场。

Two deaths reported by MOH for 2 May; One from complications due to COVID-19 infection, the other still under investigation

The Ministry of Health (MOH) has confirmed and verified an additional 447…