Screenshot from The Straits Times’ video

President Halimah Yacob said in Parliament yesterday (24 Aug) that the issue of work pass holders competing with Singaporeans for jobs will be addressed as it has become a “major source of anxiety” and potentially become “a divisive issue”.

Job competition between foreigners and Singaporeans has been the subject of debate lately, after it was reported on 5 August that the Manpower Ministry (MOM) had placed another 47 companies on its Fair Consideration Framework (FCF) watchlist for suspected discriminatory hiring practices.

Consequently, posts highlighting the LinkedIn accounts of Temasek’s employees from India were circulated on social media, questioning why the government-owned firm is filled with foreigners instead of locals. Temasek indicated the posts as “divisive, racist campaign” and claimed that it was made based on “false claims”.

Speaking at the opening of Singapore’s 14th Parliament, Madam Halimah noted that the competition for jobs from work pass holders has become a “potentially divisive issue closely connected to Singaporean identity”.

“This has become a major source of anxiety, especially among mid-career Singaporeans. We understand these concerns. They not only touch on matters of livelihood, but also on our sense of identity and belonging. They will be addressed,” she noted.

As the master of their own land, Singaporeans must have confidence in the rights and privileges of citizenship, said Madam Halimah, adding that the interests of Singaporeans are “always paramount” in all that the Government does.

“We will work with employers to further strengthen the capabilities of our workforce in every field, and ensure that firms treat Singaporeans fairly when they recruit or retrench workers,” she stated.

“In all that we do, the interests of Singaporeans are always paramount.”

However, Madam Halimah believes that Singapore must not turn inwards and away from the world. She added that the city-state “should continue to welcome and integrate those who can contribute to Singapore” and improve the lives of Singaporeans.

Noting that multiracialism will always be a “core element” of the Singaporean identity, she urged Singaporeans to listen and to try to understand one another as more meaningful discussions are opened up on the issue.

“We must strive to obtain greater insight, build shared understanding and use our diverse perspectives and ideas to achieve better outcomes for all,” said Madam Halimah.

Netizens demand actions instead of explanations from the Govt

Despite Madam Halimah has given the assurance that the issue of jobs competition from work pass holders will be addressed by the authorities, many netizens are still not convinced.

Penning their thoughts under the comment section of Mothership.sg‘s and The Straits Times’ Facebook posts – which covered the President’s remarks in Parliament yesterday – many netizens called for actions from the Government to resolve the issue as they hardly convinced by her assurance.

Some netizens commented that Madam Halimah should direct her speech to the Ministry of Manpower to resolve the issue, instead of telling it to the public.

While others – who penned their comments on Channels News Asia’s post – asked why the Government only realized about the issue now, when it has been happening for awhile.

Meanwhile, several netizens urged the Government to remove its Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) – a free trade agreement between Singapore and India to strengthen bilateral trade – as they opined that Singaporeans are not benefitting from the CECA.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
32 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Former MOF civil servant turned journalist praises Minister Heng’s collaborative approach in building Singapore’s economy

Taking a look at Heng Swee Keat’s tenure as Finance Minister, Channel…

Latest data: Number of foreign PMETs continues to increase in Singapore

Last week, the Manpower Ministry (MOM) finally released its foreign workforce numbers.…

反诉总理滥用司法程序 梁实轩针对高庭裁决上诉遭三司驳回

上周五(27日),时评人梁实轩针对反告李显龙总理滥用司法程序被驳回,呈上诉庭上诉,不过上诉庭仍维持高庭裁决,梁实轩上诉失败。 当时,梁实轩也在脸书分享,经过一个半小时聆讯,他的代表律师为其口头辩论,而总理代表律师文达星则未参与,上诉庭最终驳回他的上诉。 文达星原本要求讼费2万3000元,惟最终上诉庭裁定,梁需支付李显龙总理两万元诉讼费。 大法官梅达顺、上诉庭法官潘文龙和朱迪柏拉卡斯(Judith Prakash)组成上诉庭三司,聆听林鼎代表梁实轩作出上诉陈情。 只因分享一则脸书贴文,梁实轩在去年11月被总理提告诽谤,为此他由代表律师林鼎,在去年12月底反诉总理滥用法庭程序,并向总理索讨“名誉损害”的赔偿。 不过,高庭法官Aedit Abdullah在今年三月裁决,驳回梁实轩的反诉,指后者“没有合理的诉讼理由”。 林鼎在27日的聆讯上,也辩解到总理采取诽谤诉讼保护其政府声誉,但这也容易对言论自由产生寒蝉效应;再者,分享有关诽谤文章的有上万人,但只有梁实轩一人被起诉。他认为,总理似乎高度选择性地决定谁将被提告,而矛头就指向一个多年来撰写了2000多篇文章,以批评政府著称的人。 不过,梅达顺则认为,林鼎应知道民事法中原告可选择诉讼的形式;且即便对方是公众人物,法庭也不能限制受害者诉诸法庭的权益。 梅达顺称对于卷入诉讼的被告,提控被诽谤的原告,他表示感到“不明所以”(could not…