While the additional S$8 billion the Government is committing for further COVID-19 support measures is a welcome move, Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) Leong Mun Wai of the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) said that the Government should not be afraid to do more, including drawing down further from the national reserves.

In a Facebook post on Tuesday (18 Aug), Mr Leong cited Deputy Prime Minister (DPM) and Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat’s announcement that the S$8 billion will be reallocated from development budgets that have been delayed due to the pandemic, instead of from the reserves.

However, the newly elected NCMP stressed that there needs to be continued “decisive and sustained actions” to help Singaporeans and local companies in these unprecedented times. Using an analogy, he described the pandemic as a “natural disaster similar to a massive earthquake or hurricane” which requires the use of fiscal resources such as the national resources more decisively in order to “to maintain business and consumer confidence, national productive capacity, and individual livelihoods”.

He referred to an article on Academia SG by Economists Yeoh Lam Keong, Manu Bhaskaran, Donald Low, and Tan Kim Song in which they set out key principles that they believe should guide the Government’s support of the poor, unemployed, and the private sector during these trying times.

Mr Leong stressed, “As long as it is for our people, we should not hesitate to drawdown further on our reserves.”

“We should not be too concerned about moral hazards, or the state inadvertently propping up firms that are not viable in the long term,” he added.

Mr Leong asserted that he does not see a need for the Jobs Support Scheme (JSS) quantum to be scaled back as it “adds to the confusion which should be avoided now as sentiments are very fragile.”

On Monday (17 Aug), DPM Heng announced that starting September, the JSS will be scaled back from up to 75 per cent to up to 50 per cent for salaries up to March 2021. The quantum varies depending on the sectors, with the hardest hit sectors receiving 50 per cent JSS up to March 2021, while those managing well will receive 10 per cent up to December 2020.

The PSP politician suggested that the Government would have to spend a further S$20 to S$30 billion for 2021 and 222 to sustain economic recovery in the wake of the pandemic, adding that the reserves can take it.

Mr Leong explained, “That amount is roughly equal to the net investment income from our reserves every year, so spending that amount would not reduce the principal of our reserves.”

“The reserves were accumulated from years of hard work and sacrifices of the Singaporeans and this is the time to draw on it to guarantee our present and future livelihoods,” he emphasised.

In addition to the JSS, Mr Leong also presented some recommendations of adjustments to the Government’s COVID-19 support measures, starting with speeding up the eligibility check for its COVID-19 Support Grant (CSG) and Workfare Special Payment schemes, noting that they have received feedback from many Singaporeans that their applications were being processed very slowly.

Next, he suggested a review on the further JSS payments from September to March. Specifically, whether or not these should also include PRs – another issue he said that they’ve received much feedback on.

“After all, the reserves belong to Singaporeans and should be spent on Singaporeans,” Mr Leong added.

Besides that, he urged the Government to look into ways to reduce rentals, which has not decreased much during the pandemic. In fact, he noted that property prices have increased, which “shows that the property owners are not sharing the pain”.

“The Government should look into ways to reduce rental. It is quite unreasonable that companies should be paying the same amount of rental when the premises are not being used during the circuit-breaker period,” said the first-time NCMP.

Quoting from the article shared in his post, Mr Leong concurred with veteran economist Mr Yeoh’s point, which suggests that Government should “consider legislatively mandated ‘rent abatement’ that permits tenants materially affected by COVID-19 to pay a reduced and fair proportion of rent”.

“The COVID-19 Bill currently contains a provision for the adjudication of applications by assessors, so there is already a mechanism to determine a ‘fair proportion of rent’ under the circumstances,” the quote continued.

Mr Leong highlighted that this practice is a similar move taken by the New Zealand government following an earthquake which rendered many businesses inaccessible. The Auckland District Law Society (ADLS) applies to all natural events which are outside the control of tenants – such as epidemics and earthquakes – and significantly impacts the use of their premises, he explained.

Finally, he suggested that the Government should help start-ups via “a venture eco-system led by the venture capital industry with proper tax incentives” instead of providing equity directly.

Mr Leong concluded, “The force of destruction of COVID-19 has diminished over time as the virus become weaker through repeated mutation and our system more prepared and experienced in handling the crisis.

“Although we should not be complacent, we now have some time to plan better to achieve better outcomes.”

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

工业仲裁庭指新捷运集体协定未违反雇佣法

今年9月,五名巴士司机分别状告本地巴士业者新捷运(SBS Transit),指责后者违反加班工酬条款,支付不足工酬。 新捷运在本月18日,宣布把上述薪资诉讼申请转移到工业仲裁庭(IAC)审理。此前诉方将诉状提呈推事庭聆讯。 当时,新捷运声称,有鉴于上诉巴士司机提出的诉讼,也牵涉该公司与NTWU的共同协议,故此依法、为了新捷运全体巴士车长利益、与NTWU的良好关系,新捷运决定把此纠纷交由工业仲裁庭作裁决。 至于人力部当时亦赞同,交由工业仲裁庭处理“是建设性举措”。 上述诉讼在本月4日开审,诠释新捷运和全国交通工友联合会(NTWU)签署的集体协定中,有关超时工作和休息日的条款,是否符合法律规定。 不过,根据该庭法官陈成安发布的书面判决,指新捷运在休息日、超时工作薪酬和工时方面,并未违反上述集体协定。 法官是根据新捷运提供的雇佣合同、轮值表和薪酬计算样本作判断,也指休息日条款也未违反雇佣法。 根据合同,新捷运要求巴士司机必须每周工作48小时,包括4小时强制的“内置加班”工时。但是根据雇佣法令,雇员每日工时不超过八小时,或每周不超过44小时。超过这工时就必须支付一般工资1.5倍的酬劳。 而新捷运则告知法庭,如司机拒绝“内置加班”,就可被视为违反合约。此外,每周工作48小时,惟工作日仍有45分钟休息和包餐点。 对此法官认为,扣除了45分钟休息,也意味着每周工时为43.5小时,并未违反雇佣法。 但他指出有关雇佣合同一些差异可能引起混乱和误解,并认为取决于新捷运和交通工友联合会,是否检讨与司机的工作安排,并且依据雇佣法使用的条款定义,如“基本工资率”、“总收入”和“工时”、“加班”等。…

Tan Kin Lian suggests Health Ministry should set rates for various types of treatment in order for MediShield Life to be fully claimable

Yesterday we ran a story on how an elderly man was only…

CTE两闸门下周一调高收费 网民:大选后意料中事

陆路交通管理局,在本月25日发文告,上月恢复公路电子收费(ERP)的其中两个闸门,将从8月31日起调高收费,另有一个闸门,将在同一天恢复收费。 届时将有四个位于中央快速公路(CTE)的公路电子收费闸门,向驾驶者收取过路费。 上月开始,CTE北向路段、过了泛岛快速公路(PIE)之后的两个闸门,傍晚6时至7时收取一块钱过路费。 但陆交局称,CTE部分路段在高峰时段出现拥堵,为此决定,下周一开始将上述闸门收费,上调至两块钱。 CTE南向路段、往PIE樟宜方向和实龙岗路的闸门,也将在31日开始恢复收费,早上7时30分至8时的路费为一元。 尽管陆交局解释,这是因为CTE部分路段持续拥堵,才调整收费,但似乎一些民众对此早已麻木,甚至调侃这是选举后“意料中事”。 一些网民在《亚洲新闻台》、《联合早报》等本地主流媒体脸书留言,质问当国人还在面对疫情下经济不景、就业等难关,还要再增加民众负担是否符合时宜? 即便总理李显龙,在8月9日的国庆献词,都表示未来数月,可能“更多公司可能会倒闭,更多员工会被裁退”,一方面要国人同舟共济,但与此同时又从他处增加老百姓负担,又要如何让人民携手共进? 网民Raymond Ang:不解为何要调高收费?是变相请国人放弃开车挤公共交通?总统、总理和部长们,请理解不要再家中国人负担,已经好些人都要接受减薪保工作、甚至被裁员,有些已经好几个月没工作了。 既然今年是国庆55周年,那么是否医疗开销也能折扣55巴仙呢?那么做还更有同理心。

“We’re humans, we make mistakes”: Grace Fu at PAP rally

Andrew Ong On the fifth day of rallies, a crowd of 3,000…