Blogger and activist Roy Yi Ling Ngerng took to Facebook on Thursday (6 Aug) to question Temasek CEO Ho Ching’s implication that Singapore’s gross domestic product (GDP) growth has benefited the country’s wages.

He is referring to a post she has shared on her Facebook page which made that claim.

Countering that assumption, Mr Ngerng went on to compare Singapore’s GDP to that of other countries in relation to wages as shown in a graph.

For example, he noted that the median wages of New Zealand, Australia, the United States, and Canada are at about 85 to 95 per cent of the respective country’s GDP per capita. In comparison, Singapore’s is at only 50 per cent.

On top of that, the level of Singapore’s median wage in relation to its GDP is equivalent to the minimum wage of these other countries in relation to GDP per capita — that is about 50 to 60 per cent.

Mr Ngerng went on to highlight that Singapore also does not have a minimum wage. However, the wage earned by outsourced resident cleaners in the country is less than 20 per cent of the GDP per capita.

He answers the question of whether Singapore’s GDP per capita benefits Singaporeans and grows local wages with another question: “Why is the middle-income in Singapore earning a median wage that is at the rate of minimum wage in other countries?”

The blogger went on to note that if Singapore workers were to earn wages on par with that of other countries, middle-income workers here would be earning a median wage of about S$5,000 — which is roughly S$1,000 more than the current figure. He added that the minimum wage should also be set to S$3,000.

In fact, Mr Ngerng said that S$3,000 is the minimum wage in Australia, New Zealand, and the UK. While in Canada, the minimum wage is S$2,500.

He continued, “And yet, Singapore has a GDP per capita that is higher than all of them, but Singapore’s workers earn lower than them.

“As such, when Ho Ching shared the article claiming that Singapore’s GDP growth has benefited Singaporeans, is this really true?”

Mr Ngerng also shared a link to an article by The New Lens which dissects the salary differential between Singapore’s Prime Minister, Opposition Leader, and cabinet ministers, in comparison to their counterparts in other nations.

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

跨岛线第一阶段 陆交局颁3.56亿元钻掘隧道工程合约

据陆路交通管理局(LTA)文告,当局拟建设3.2公里的隧道,衔接航空园站(Aviation Park Station)和罗央站,这是跨岛线第一阶段的(CRL1)的一部分, 预计工程将在今年第二季动工。 有关钻掘隧道土木工程合约,将总值3亿5600万元,颁给一家联营公司,由大成建设(Taisei Corporation),以及中国建筑工程(China State Construction Engineering Corporation)新加坡分公司组成。 当局称,此次工程将将首次采用大直径隧道钻凿机,以兴建有两条轨道的隧道。 跨岛线第一阶段全长29公里,预计在2030年通车,计划设立12个地铁站:实龙岗北、光明山站、德义、宏茂桥、达维士笃(Tavistock)、后港、德福、巴西立、巴西立东、淡滨尼北、罗央,以及航空园站。…

Prof Yaacob Ibrahim raises the issue of trust in the Singapore government in his budget debate speech

During the budget debate speech in Parliament earlier today (27 Feb), MP…

国大老龄中心研究:年长就业者反映,收入才是持续工作最主要因素

杜克新加坡国立大学医学院,老龄研究与教育中心(CARE)发布《新加坡健康、就业、社交和代际转移研究》报告,采访了4千549名,60岁以上的年长新加坡人。 报告也调查这些年长受访者的就业/退休情况。调查显示在2016-2017年度,60-69岁年龄阶层中有45巴仙男性和31巴仙女性反映,目前仍在就业。 其中65-69岁年龄群体,有高达77.2巴仙受访者反映,收入是促使他们工作的最主要因素。其次54.2巴仙为“享受工作”,只有32.6巴仙表示工作是为了能继续“维持良好健康”。 有关调查询问受访者目前的就业状况(全职、兼职、退休或从未工作等),以及正在求职的年长者。报告排除了其中469名反映从未工作的受访者。报告也纳入受访者年龄、性别、种族、婚姻情况、教育程度、住房类型和生活情况等因素。 其中,60-64岁群体中,有高达73巴仙男性和51巴仙女性仍在工作,相比下65-69岁只有60巴仙男性和38巴仙女性仍在就业。 高达76.8巴仙年长男性,以及77.5巴仙女性均反映,收入才是促使他们工作的主要因素,只有21巴仙男性受访者反映,工作是为了享受生活。 此外,只有32.4巴仙男性和54.3就业年长女性反映,工作是为了“维持健康”,至于认为工作是为了“打发时间”的受访者更是少之又少,男女性受访者均只有7.6巴仙和2.4巴仙。 报告也指年长者持续工作有收入,有助减少依赖储蓄来应付日常开销。如果劳工被迫离开职场,退休后面对健康和压力的风险更高。 报告也认可年长劳工对经济的贡献,年长与年轻雇员组成的混合工作团队能加强生产力。 报告指出,年长劳工就业课题乃是探讨新加坡社会老龄化现况的其中一项重要层面。    

Do not print pictures of me smiling – Lee Kuan Yew

The United Kingdom (UK) introduced the Freedom of Information Act in 2000.…