Source: Tan Chuan-Jin Facebook

Tan Chuan-Jin urged netizens to err on the side of caution and not just simply “take an image, write and slam” agencies or the government yet doing nothing structurally to help the vulnerable. 

The Member of Parliament (MP) took to his Facebook and Instagram to affirm the Ministry of Social and Family Development’s (MSF) stance that using social media as a channel to seek help for those in need may not be the most sagacious. 

The MSF uploaded a clarification post on Facebook on Wednesday (29 Jul) at 7pm regarding a viral Facebook post which detailed the plight of an elderly cleaner.

In the ministry’s post, it posited facts and circumstances surrounding the elderly woman. 

Two hours later, Mr Tan said in a Facebook post that he has “no regrets about the work” he’s done in the MSF front. 

Mr Tan, who was elected MP for Marine Parade Group Representation Constituency in the recent General Election 2020, helmed the MSF from April 2015 to September 2017. He then went on to be Speaker of Parliament replacing President Halimah Yacob. 

He recounted how he would post more on the issue of community assistance because it “helps us understand the complexities better but more critically it was to encourage folks to be proactive and approach people who appear to need help”. 

However, he drew the line when it came to the actual cases of people he met and assisted because he knew what “the mob would do with it”. 

The term “mob” casually refers to “mob mentality”, which is a form of groupthink that formulates an “us versus them” attitude based on irrational thought that may have been well-intentioned.

Even if this is so, Mr Tan disclaimed that assistance was not rendered because he has advised his team that even in doubtful cases, “provide assistance”. 

It’s ok if we are ‘taken for a ride’ because you never know, it may well have been critical. Speak to them, listen, find out more, take down details and let us know so that we can follow up and verify. Things aren’t often as it seems but we will help where needed.”

Mr Tan subsequently posted a series of images accompanied by a post at 11pm which explained “how (the) social team works”. 

“During our house visits, I spend time chatting with residents and you can soon suss out issues. We then follow up with the Social Service Office , Agency for Integrated Care, the local Family Service Center, or HDB or all!!”

He stressed that “preventive work is key and volunteers play a key role” in rendering assistance to Singaporeans in need. 

Mr Tan outlines the proper steps the public should take to help the vulnerable, as sharing on social media can have “untoward consequences”

He then followed up with another Facebook post to detail the nine steps that society can take to help the vulnerable group.

These steps include noting down details of the situation, taking down the person’s particulars, calling the Comcare hotline or visiting the nearest Social Service Office (SSO). 

He reposted it on Instagram too. 

Mr Tan re-emphasised that “sharing on social media can have untoward consequences as we don’t always know the full facts and stories”. 

“The reality is that MSF Singapore’s clarification will NEVER (go) viral the way the original criticism did.” 

Koh Meng Shuen was the member of the public who first shed light on the elderly woman’s plight on Facebook on Monday (27 Jul). 

The viral post has since been taken down due to public backlash and in view of the facts predicated by the MSF. 

“A number of folks sent (Mr Koh’s) post to me because the individual who had posted it had taken the opportunity to attack me. Some sent me to flag it up for my attention and asked me to help the lady. Some taunted and mocked me,” Mr Tan elaborated. 

However, in the social media age, Mr Tan “guessed” it may always be the public’s “choice” to continue to use social media platforms as a form of discourse. 

Did the vitality in virality prompt MSF to provide immediate assistance to the elderly cleaner?

Within the span of two days of Mr Koh’s post, MSF has: 

  • Identified the woman and visited her on Tuesday (28 Jul) to see if she needed any help and how they can lend support
  • Contacted her employer, who hires her as a dishwasher at a hawker centre in Tampines Hub, to ascertain possibilities of better-paying work arrangements 
  • Initiated assessment of her eligibility for the COVID-19 Support Grant, which provides monthly payouts of $500 – $800
  • Stated that they will support her in other ways – such as $120 food vouchers monthly for the next six months, and financial help for Mdm L’s medical expenses

In a post on Wednesday night, TOC asked whether “this situation (would have) come to the immediate attention of the MSF for redress had it not gone viral”.

“Had the public not taken the initiative to circulate and publicise the plight of this elderly lady, would she have rapidly gotten the aid that she so obviously needs?

Although MSF pointed out some inaccuracies in the post, it seemed the post contained truths too. 

(They have) not disputed key facts such as the elderly lady (having) to travel to Sentosa seeking employment, nor the fact that she had to sell her flat to finance her medical bills.”

The writer notes that the size and bureaucracy of a large government organisation like MSF “may not always be in a position to dispense help quickly”. 

“In that sense, the public helps create awareness in order to bring about the help. Even if there are some inaccuracies, the publicity did achieve the desired result. Is that such a bad thing?”

Therefore, when MSF cautioned against public posting on the basis of inaccuracies and misrepresentation of facts – is the MSF “looking out for the interests of this elderly lady or its own reputation?”

“At the end of the day, the question remains open — had this post not gone viral, would the elderly lady in question have gotten the help she needed at speed? And if the answer is no, which is the greater need? Fast help or the MSF’s reputation?”

The viral post about a coincidental encounter with an elderly cleaner on the train who struggles to make ends meet

The story of Madam L first arose from a series of screenshots from Mr Koh’s Instagram story on Facebook on Monday, which was shared over 20,000 times and has since been removed.

He shared that he had met her while he was heading to the city via MRT, when she tapped him on the shoulder and asked him how to go to Sentosa from Bedok.

After telling her that she needs to disembark at Outram Park to change trains to HarbourFront, he proceeded to accompany her as she seemed hesitant.

He shared that the lady, referred to as “Ah Umm”, shared to him that she is a Malaysian-born citizen and currently lives in Sembawang with her two friends. She claimed that she had no “formal schooling” and only can speak Chinese.

He also said he was told that the lady’s husband had passed away many years ago, while her only son died during a “heli-rappeling” exercise with the Commandos a “long time ago”.

She claimed that the Government has promised to give compensation for her late son’s death – with S$300 per month – but up until now, she has never even received “one cent” from the Government, he narrated.

“Now national day coming, they ask us hang the flag. I don’t want to hang. Hang for what? My son died for this flag. This flag also never help me. How to don’t work? I will starve to death,” the old lady told him.

When he asked her why she was heading to Sentosa, she explained that her friend told her about a job there that pays S$10 per hour to wash dishes.

In her current job, she said, she only earns S$20 per day working as a cleaner and dishwasher at a hawker centre situated in Tampines Hub.

Aside from her hourly salary, she told him that she was given with no free meals, nor transportation allowance from the place that she currently works at.

The old lady added, “Eat lunch, eat dinner already $5, already one hour of work gone. Left S$15, sometimes don’t eat better I think”.

She also revealed to him that she has had four major heart surgeries, in which each surgery would cost her about S$40,000. The old lady noted that she had to sell her house in order to pay for the exorbitant surgeries fees.

He wrote in his Facebook post that a salary of S$5 per hour is a “slave wage” and “nobody should be working menial labour for S$5 per hour”.

“People always ask, ‘how will we pay for minimum wage?’ But people never ask, ‘who will end up paying the price if we don’t pay for minimum wage, and how will they pay?

“People like Ah Umm pay. They pay with their house. With their life. With their sweat, and their tears (she cried a few times when she talked to me about her son, her house, her surgeries),” he added.

He noted that the ruling party People’s Action Party (PAP) has asked for a strong mandate to govern Singapore and assured Singaporeans that its PWM works. But after 50 years of the PAP’s mandate, there are still 100,000 workers remaining below minimum wage, according to the WP.

“Meanwhile Goh Chok Tong and Edwin Tong say they’re not paid enough as ministers. Tan Chuan-Jin says some old people who collect cardboard to sell do it as a form of exercise.

“No public servant in Singapore deserves to be paid S$1 million per year,” he stressed.

MSF responds to viral Facebook post with clarifications and details 

The ministry issued the clarification in question on Wednesday night stating that the ministry and its SSO colleagues “have identified the elderly woman, Mdm L”.

“She is staying in a five-room flat with her son’s family. The family has a domestic helper. Her son provides her with food and shelter but she works to supplement her other expenses. Our SSO colleagues visited her yesterday to see if she needed any help and how we can lend support,” said MSF.

According to MSF, Madam L “is a permanent resident, and she has not applied for citizenship in the past”, which makes her ineligible for Silver Support or Workfare.

“However, she receives benefits like the Solidarity Payment that are also extended to PRs,” said the Ministry.

MSF noted that Mdm L received a monthly gross salary of about $1,300 excluding CPF contribution from her employer prior to the COVID-19 circuit breaker.

“Due to reduced business volume, her employer had arranged for her and other full-time employees to work part-time as a way to retain staff. She is currently paid $675 for working part-time in 4-hour shifts (or about $6.50/hr),” said the Ministry, adding that her employer has indicated that “when business improves, they will review and reinstate the cleaners’ part-time employment to full-time”.

MSF said it is assessing Madam L’s eligibility for the COVID-19 Support Grant (CSG) which provides monthly payouts of $500 – $800.

“In addition, we will support her in other ways. Grassroots organisations will support her with $120 food vouchers monthly for the next six months. We are also arranging for her to get some help for her medical expenses,” said MSF.

MSF also said that the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) “has verified that Mdm L’s elder son, a regular warrant officer, died during a Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) freefall training session in South Africa, in May 2009”.

“Full compensation was paid out to his family. MINDEF and the SAF extend their deepest condolences to the family,” said the ministry.

MSF said that while it appreciates “the effort of members of the public in reaching out to those who seem to be in need”, disclosing their circumstances on social media “may lead to further distress for these vulnerable groups of people and their families”.

“Such posts may not correctly reflect the circumstances of vulnerable groups of people, who may be elderly, or may not share all the details accurately because of the stressors they are facing,” said MSF.

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

内政部指普丽蒂兄妹道歉虚伪

对于美丽求求你”普丽蒂(Preetipls)兄妹今日(2日)发表的致歉声明,内政部也作出反驳,指其道歉没诚意和虚伪。 内政部声明指出,普丽蒂兄妹是在恶搞此前创意公司Havas和新传媒的联合道歉声明,兄妹俩是假装道歉,实则在藐视国人对于他们引发争议视频的关注。 内政部也指,这不是普丽蒂兄妹首次表达这种种族情绪。在一年前,普丽蒂在一短视频扮成一位中国人,模仿中国传统习俗,但把华人描述成好利的赌徒。 而近期普丽蒂苏巴什则为为新传媒国庆庆祝活动写了首歌,指新加坡容许体制化的歧视,歌词写道:“我们活在一个让我们习以为常的系统… …棕色皮肤的男人就会被截停要求检查身份”,对此内政部驳斥这种描述不实。 内政部强调,只要任何人作出攻击性言论,不论族群肤色当局都会采取行动。 文告补充,过去一名36岁的华族女性曾发表带种族暗示的评论,被警方调查。女子后来真诚道歉,警方和总检察署商讨后,向她发出严厉警告。 今年1月,警方也以刑事法典提控一名蓄意伤害马来族群情感的华裔男子,后者在组屋区楼下涂鸦含有种族歧视内容的文字。 内政部声称,警方对普丽蒂的调查在继续进行中,当局也会征询总检察署的建议。

【冠状病毒19】4月24日本地新增897例确诊

根据卫生部文告,截至本月24日中午12时,本地新增897例冠状病毒19(COVID19)确诊,大部分为住在客工宿舍的工作准证持有者。其中13例为本地公民或永久居民。 同样,该部表示仍在确认这些病例细节,并将在晚间再发布详情。 本地累计确诊病例已增至1万2075例。

雇员控诉公司歧视聘雇 人力部澄清:“并非事实真相”

日前一名员工在网路上控诉公司以外国人才取代她,随后向人力部寻求协助无果的故事引起网民的关注,人力部于14日发表声明澄清并非“事件的真相”,同时她称劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟(TAFEP)未跟进案件并未属实。 此事由维权人士吴家和于3月6日在脸书所转载,随后由本社英语站报导。该名化名“劳拉”的女士,声称其公司欲聘请来自香港的外国人才,以此取代她的职位。随后她找上人力部,但被转介到劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟。 她表示,自己也听从人力部的指示,立即联系TAFEP。然而等到她寻求国务资政张志贤和人力部长杨莉明帮助、且威胁公开此事,TAFEP才给予她回应。 TAFEP联系劳拉并给予建议,即等到她收到遣散费后再来进行投诉,因为他们无法保证公司在调查期间是否会提供遣散费。当时劳拉已离开公司两个月。 劳拉声称,如果她不签署“公司免责”信函,人力部与TAFEP无法保证他的遣散费,而他的公司也表示若她不签,公司就不会支付遣散费。 她阐述,这就等同于“企业霸凌”(corporate bullying)。 与此同时,她认为人力部也在默许这种情况发生,她表示,“人力部对于裁员都了如指掌,因为公司裁员是需要向人力部报告,而且他们也批准了香港人才的EP,让她取代我的职位。” “人力部有怀疑过这个外国人才正是取代本地劳动力的可能吗? 仅仅因为它是“公司内部调动”,所以他们就不再质疑了吗?” 本社随后也联系了劳拉的雇主与TAFEP取得回应,当时没有任何一方的答复。 曾公开劳拉真名随后又撤回…