Photo source: Journal Aviation website

The Eagle Services Asia (ESA) was found to have been laying off its employees without negotiating with the unions, said the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) on Wednesday (29 July), adding that it has stepped in to halt the firm’s retrenchment exercise.

ESA is a joint venture between SIA Engineering Company (49%) and Pratt & Whitney (51%). It’s worth noting that the SIA Engineering Company is also run by Temasek Holdings.

Previously on 28 July, it was reported that ESA has retrenched 144 of its employees between 22 and 24 July, but the firm refuted the retrenchment allegations and assured that all its employees were still on its payroll.

It claimed that some affected workers were allowed to take paid leave to wait for the outcome of its negotiations with the three unions – namely the Air Transport Executive Staff Union, SIA Engineering Company Engineers and Executives Union and the Singapore Airlines Staff Union.

Following that, the NTUC said in a joint statement with the three unions on Wednesday (29 July) that ESA had proceeded to retrench its workers on 22 July without finalising a name list with the unions, despite it was locked in negotiations with the unions to keep jobs.

“When the unions were alerted that ESA management had gone ahead to start informing employees that they may be retrenched, the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and the unions took decisive action and stepped in to stop any further action by the company until an agreement could be reached.

“The lack of transparency and disregard for negotiations with the unions is not acceptable and is not how a retrenchment exercise should be conducted,” it stated.

Channel News Asia reported that even as the unions continued negotiations with ESA, they separately engaged with their members.

In fact, a secret ballot which authorised by the NTUC’s secretary-general Ng Chee Meng has been conducted to sanction legal industrial action to “rectify any shortcomings and improve the retrenchment process, if and where necessary”.

Mr Ng who lost his parliamentary position in the recent General Election, also took to Facebook on Wednesday noting that he was informed about an “unfair” retrenchment exercise by workers and unions a week ago. In response, he gave the assurance that the NTUC will intervene to protect them.

“At that time, NTUC Singapore, the Air Transport Executive Staff Union, SIA Engineering Company Engineers and Executives Union, and Singapore Airlines Staff Union were in tense negotiations to fight for a fair and dignified retrenchment,” he wrote.

Mr Ng further noted, “To let everyone understand that NTUC will stand up to protect our workers, I authorised our unions to prepare for industrial action should it become necessary to persuade management not to take unilateral decisions. We wanted a fair negotiation.”

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Indian national being investigated for participating assembly without permit

The police is investigating a 32-year old Indian national for participating in…

毕丹星:法庭也有能力对网络假消息迅速反应

工人党秘书长毕丹星强调,比起在《防止网络假消息与网络操纵法》下赋予部长的权力裁定网络假消息,司法机关才更为合适成为最初、也是最终的仲裁者。 在本周三于国会三读《防假消息法》,虽然工人党只有九票反对无法阻止该法以72票高票赞成通过,不过工人党议员们皆阐明了对该法的反对立场,特别是毕丹星认为,即便是法庭也有能力尽速裁定网络假消息个案,不必然非得把权力交予部长。 人民行动党议员符致镜在本月8日的国会辩论质疑,有鉴于网络假消息需要在数小时内尽速处理,交由法庭审核裁定是否合适。 毕丹星对此表示不认同,并以《防止骚扰法令》(POHA)为例,处理针对个人或企业组织的网络假消息也可以很迅速。 国会也在本月7日三读通过《防止骚扰法》修正,也拟议增设针对网络和非网络的骚扰案件的法庭,在48-72小时内加速处理保护令审讯;同时,受害者可单方面申请临时通知命令(interim order)。 “所以我并不认同符议员观点,除非是我误解了,在《防止骚扰法》下人们在面对假消息时,无法预期迅速有效的处理方案?” 毕丹星坚信法庭其实是能够以最快速度完成程序。 符致镜:各专业领域公务员对付假消息 符致镜则反问,网络假消息无所不在,何以要舍弃在治安、卫生、经济等各领域有专业经验的16名部长和13万5000名公务员不用,即便增强司法机关,后者又需要用多久时间尽速对付假消息? 他也区分,《防止骚扰法》旨在解决针对个人隐私权遭侵犯等私人问题;而《防假消息法》是针对社会公众利益、暴乱以及种族不和谐而设立。 符致镜认为虽然《防止骚扰法》与《防假消息法》所处理都是非同小可的案件,但《防假消息法》案攸关社会公众利益的问题,需要尽速处理,相较之下,《免受骚扰法》所处理的案件并不如《防假消息法》紧急。…

李玮玲公开2013年柯金梨和父亲往来电邮 内容讨论遗嘱事宜

已故建国总理李光耀的女儿李玮玲,今早在个人脸书公布一则誌期2013年12月12日的电邮。有关电邮是由李和李律师事务所的柯金梨致函给李光耀,内容提及平分遗产事宜。 李玮玲在贴文中指责,其兄长一再指责其兄嫂,即李显扬妻子林学芬有份参与并促使父亲李光耀签署2013年12月的遗嘱。 “柯金梨否认参与2013年遗嘱,这都是虚假的,柯金梨一直在撒谎,她也违背了对他客户即我父亲的职责。” 她重申李和李律师事务所一直都是父亲的私人事务律师,协助处理包括遗嘱、授权书和医疗照护事前指示(AMD)。 “事实是父亲在签署2013年12月遗嘱前,对于他想修改的事宜和柯金梨有深入讨论。从2013年11月底直到12月13日,父亲就他的遗嘱内容,以电邮往来和柯金梨讨论。” 她指出,和柯金梨在此前的讨论,都反映在父亲在2013年12月17日签署的遗嘱,正是父亲想要的,平分给所有子女,也是父亲和母亲及所有人一致同意的。 李玮玲也表示,此次公开的只是父亲与柯金梨其中一则讨论2013年12月遗嘱的电邮,“还有更多,”不过她未明言还有更多是否意味着仍会继续公开更多内容和档案。 李和李律师事务所的合伙人,也是柯玉芝侄女的柯金梨,曾在去年2017年向《海峡时报》表示,自己没有参与最终遗嘱的订立。 约两周前(4月15日)李玮玲就曾在个人脸书发文抨击,近期媒体报导不断重复哥哥李显龙总理,对李显扬的“不实且可耻的指控”(false and dishonourable allegations),指后者涉及诈欺父亲以在遗嘱中获得更多份额。…

Liu repeatedly says he has no contact with govt leaders after he left public service but Heng says he has met Liu

In an interview with the Chinese media published last Friday (17 Jul),…