Readers are no longer allowed to write their comments on stories published by Yahoo News on its website. The media outlet has temporarily suspended commenting on its articles as it wants to improve its community experience.

“Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passion,” it said in its website.

It added, “In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting. In the meantime, we welcome your feedback to help us enhance the experience.”

While netizens can still comment on the news site’s articles on its official Facebook page, most of its readers tend to comment in the article section as it provides a certain level of anonymity.

TOC has reached out to Yahoo News to find out why they have disabled the comment function in their website.

In the past, comments on the news site by the netizens have been anonymous and mostly critical of the establishment.

In Singapore, other major mainstream news sites like Channel News Asia, TODAYonline, and The Straits Time have had their comments sections removed. Even non-MSM such as popular news sites like Mothership also removed its comment section.

What all these sites that have removed their comments section have in common is that they are media accredited by the Singapore Government.

Update: In response to our query, a Yahoo spokesperson wrote, “We are temporarily suspending comments on Yahoo articles globally in order to prioritize and strengthen our community and engagement with our audience. Our goal has been and will always be to create a safe, engaging place to connect our community to their interests and passions.”

Subscribe
Notify of
106 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】人力部、卫生部联合发出五则更正指示!

指责民主党主席、传染病学教授淡马亚的言论有不实之处,卫生部和人力部,透过“防假消息法”办公处,对包括主流媒体在内的单位,发出多达五则更正指示! 接到更正指示的单位包括:亚洲新闻台(CNA)、国立大学协会(NUSS)、网络公民和新叙事(New Naratif),这也是首次有主流媒体接到指示。 至于被指含有“不实陈述”的短片,包括国立大学协会(NUSS)在本月3日发布的短片、本社在4日发布的脸书贴文和短片、本社的网络直播、亚洲新闻台的文章和新叙事的音频。 联合声明中指出,淡马亚指责人力部,未咨询医疗专家意见下,劝阻雇主带工人做冠病检测等。文告解释,卫生部是在2月初,接到本地医院的通知,指有雇主带工人到医院急诊部,作冠病检测。 为此,卫生部、人力部等政府部门,在2月12日和19日发文,劝请雇主不要带健康员工到医院检测,让医疗设施用来照顾身体不适病人。 文告也强调人力部并没有劝阻雇主带工人做测试,而是除非是病危状况,否则若工友身体不适,应送工友先看全科医生,由医生来审核病人是否需送医院做检测。

Singapore to rely on “intelligence sharing” with Australia in preparation for “expected reprisals” after Christchurch massacre: Ng Eng Hen

In an effort to step up Singapore’s counter-terrorism measures in the face…

罗厘脚车争道 司机否认撞骑士

遭脚车骑士挡道,罗厘司机鸣笛示意对方让路,骑士也不满地打落罗厘的左侧镜,自己随后也被撞倒在路旁草坪上。 但是在面控时,罗厘司机却表示自己没有触碰到脚踏车,否认涉及鲁莽驾驶。 有关事件发生于去年12月22日,当时58岁的张胜仲,和35岁的英国籍脚车骑士张豪宇,在巴西立第三通道和巴西立坡交界处发生冲突,两人在事后,于今年1月皆被控上庭。 然而张胜仲面对的控状,于今年三月份,遭控方将从原本的“疏忽行为”修改为更严重的“鲁莽驾驶”,指控他突然左转罗厘并撞上脚车司机,导致对方自脚车上摔下,倒在草坪上。 据《刑事法典》,疏忽行为导致他人生命受危害可被判入狱不超过六个月、或罚款不超过2500元、或两者兼施;而鲁莽驾驶刑法则是疏忽行为的一倍,即罚款不超过5000元、入狱不超过一年、或两者兼施。 供证人指罗厘曾越界 张胜仲表示不认罪,并且没有接触到脚踏车,只是查案人员陈俊严指出,张胜仲所驾驶的罗厘当时曾一度越过分界线,再从隔壁车道左转向脚踏车骑士。 身为控方第一个供证人的陈俊严也法庭上投放出三段行车记录的画面,以证实其说辞。 惟,张胜仲的代表律师对此表示,其被告人当时听到类似有东西被压碎的声音,而且也听到右边德士鸣笛,以为已经撞到德士了,所以才左转。 而张胜仲始终坚持,他的罗厘并没有和脚踏车接触。 另外,张胜仲也因为没有在事发24小时内报案,因此触犯公共交通法令,一旦罪成将可被罚款不超过一千元,或者坐牢不超过三个月。

建国一代老人露宿逾两月 毕博渊归咎“体制疏忽”欠人文关怀

政治工作者毕博渊日前揭露,一名建国一代年长者,被迫在红山景熟食中心露宿逾两个月。 毕博渊在3月20日的一则脸书贴文中透露,这名名为林启坤(译音)老人的境遇,是“制度规划不当”和“体制疏忽”下的受害者。 他说,过去的林启坤,也曾住在租赁组屋,但是他被安排和一位不相识的年长者同居。这位屋友患有中风而行动不便,结果林启坤还要负责照顾他,无形中增加额外经济负担,也没有其他人可以介入帮忙。 63岁曾入狱 林启坤因为经济压力,走投无路下一时行差踏错去犯罪,结果在63岁那年,被判监禁10年。后因行为良好,在不久前他获准提早出狱,现已70岁的他,出狱后却无处可去,只好露宿小贩中心。 毕博渊补充,林启坤还有位哥哥,但似乎因为一些建屋局的条规,他们俩无法住在一起。林启坤哥哥在八年前卖掉组屋,但是根据建屋局条规,似乎卖掉组屋10年内,都不能跟政府申请租屋。 毕博渊也声称,林启坤曾向丹绒巴葛集选区议员祖安清心和建屋发展局求助,但都未得到回音。 “照老人的描述,各个单位只是跟他阐述各种条规,如踢球般把他转给其他部门或议员,却没有解决方案。比起一位急需救助的建国一代老人,他们似乎更重视繁文缛节,显得缺乏人文关怀。” 毕博渊说,他所理解的祖安清心应是有爱心的人,何以在她选区之下,却无法为老人做到任何事情? 建屋局:今年一月已接洽老人 针对毕博渊的质问,建屋局则在本月27日发文澄清,毕博渊指没有公共机构对林启坤伸出援手,是不确实的。 建屋局指出,该局和社会及家庭发展部旗下的社会服务中心,早在今年一月就已接洽并了解林启坤的处境。在本月1日就19日,也接获祖安清心针对林启坤租屋申请的跟进询问。…