Source: Reddit / Facebook

A user took to Reddit’s Singapore community page to seek advice on what she claimed is self-radicalisation of her father due to his consumption of extreme pro-China content. 

The daughter, who goes by the handle “poppraline”, posted a thread on this issue on Friday (24 Jul) – two days before Dickson Yeo’s case was reported. She shared how her father was watching videos “day, afternoon and night” that propagated the strength and prowess of China.  

He gained this interest about a year or so ago. 

Some of the video content she cited were: 

  • China is a lion that is only sleeping right now
  • The islands in the South China sea are China’s

    • China got them first in a past dynasty
    • All other countries opposing China are flawed, barbaric, have violent histories, etc. and they should be ashamed
    • They used to be under the barbaric rule of the West, and (Chinese) should side with China instead
  • Back when the Hong Kong courts overturned the mask ban last year, one video talked about the judges involved: “Foreigners are not Chinese, they don’t have Chinese blood, that’s why they don’t care about China.”

Self-radicalisation is the action or process of an individual adopting radical positions on political or social issues by challenging the legitimacy of established norms and policies

According to the New York Times, radicalisation is a “four-stage process” – pre-radicalisation, self-identification, indoctrination and extremism – that funnels people into terrorism. 

  • “Pre-radical” is to belong to a particular community
  • “Self-identify” is to accept and internalise its belief system
  • “Indoctrination” means being groomed by an organisation
  • “Extremism” is the pledging of allegiance to a terrorist organisation and accepts that violence is a legitimate way to obtain its goals

The process of radicalisation varies for each individual and can take place over an extended period or within a very short time frame. 

The beginning of the radical views

“All this began when our Chinese TV channels started showing mainly shows from China, and removed most shows from Taiwan. He got interested in watching those shows online, and got steadily into angrier-sounding videos through recommendations,” she wrote. 

She said she is bombarded by anti-US videos all day that speak with robotic voices. 

As a result of this, she realised that her father has started verbalising “increasingly extreme and hostile comments” like:

  • Spouting conspiracy theories about SARS and COVID-19 being a western weapon targeting Asian races
  • Dismissal of other reports that claimed it might have originated from other countries, such as Germany
  • Using “angmoh” as a slur against white people
  • Gloating that more “angmohs” are dying from COVID-19, meaning they are inferior to the Chinese
  • Joking about invading the US because they seem weak right now

She continued that her mother is starting to be influenced as she echoes the superiority of China in handling COVID-19 fatalities. 

Similar experiences shared on Reddit

At time of writing, it garnered 396 comments. Other users replied to her post to detail the experiences of their family members as well.

Subscribe
Notify of
59 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

行动党议员也提环境税 林志蔚:疫情下政府亦未撤碳税

盛港集选区议员林志蔚,本周在国会中提问,若新加坡航空落实“空中漫游”(新航已打消念头),政府会否对此征收环境税。不过交通部长王乙康已表明立场,当下对新航征环境税如同“落井下石”。 据林志蔚在7日的脸书贴文,重申他本身的用意,是冀望能群策群力,商讨能在不牺牲环境的前提下扶助新航,他也坚信透过调整成本,征收环境税甚至能让新航员工受惠,保住工作。 不过林志蔚坦言对于一些言论感到有些失望,指他在危难时刻,还有意征收额外税收。 林志蔚重申,“我会在“空中漫游”的课题中提出环境税的讨论是因为,我认为好的政策,必须经过深思熟虑和严正的辩论所得出来的结果。我也一直将其视为我从政的原则。“ 在他今日(9日)发表的脸书贴文,则附上一份国会通告截图。原来那是蔡厝港集选区议员黄文鸿,询问环境和永续部部长,有鉴于瓶子或包包装饮料产品对环境的影响,当局会否征收环境税?有关提问已被撤回。 事实上,林志蔚表示,环境课题影响深远,不应以牺牲工作和利润为代价,同时也不应只是因地制宜。 “因为环境是影响着所有子孙后代的生存问题。我相信拯救工作与拯救地球,是相辅相成的。” 他也相信国会其他议员也对于环境税也会保持一些想法,但每个人都有权利在经过深思熟虑后改变主意。 与此同时,林志蔚也谈及碳税的课题,直指政府选择不撤销碳税,也间接承认环境课题的重要性。 政府亦重视环境权衡 “事实上,政府在疫情期间选择不撤销碳税,间接承认,任何政策商讨中,我们应始终牢记环境因素,与之权衡。” 尽管此次争取失败,但他在文末也表示,将会竭尽所能,坚持提出建设性批评和评论。…

NUS to hold virtual townhall after parents of Yale-NUS students demand townhall meeting over news of closure

The National University of Singapore (NUS) will be holding a virtual townhall…

【选举】很多年长者不会用SingPass! 林瑞莲促设更多柜台服务选项

工人党党主席林瑞莲指出,很多年长者都不熟悉如“SingPass”(电子政府密码)的网上服务功能,所以相关政府柜台应该提供更多的服务选项。 林瑞莲上周末(7月4日)提出有关诉求,而工人党脸书专页也在同一天上载了该党竞选集会系列(The Hammer Show)短片,李瑞莲在短片中分享年长者使用SingPass政府官网程序的困难,而且很多年长者都没有SingPass账户。 她指出,基于她个人的观察和居民反馈,虽然知道很多人都没有SingPass账户,但是政府一直不停地推动所有人采用数据化程式服务,这样的情况仍然令人难以置信。 身为捍卫阿裕尼集选区议席的工人党候选人之一,她忆述数个月前才公积金局,碰到一名老先生和其女儿的情况。只见女儿给出使用SingPass的指示,老人家只是点头和跟随指示行动。“当我们在指登陆并使用政府服务时,并不只是传送电邮,而是你必须拥有正确的ID才能登陆,然后等待一次性密码。” “你之后还要输入一些复杂的程序,以确认身份,这些公式通常较模糊。我认为这些(对他们)是一大挑战。” 她指出,虽然大部分国民都认为数码交易和服务较为方面,但是还是有人认为这些程序非常繁重且难以管理。 事实上,还有很多居民为了能够使用这些数码服务而提高花费,毕竟他们必须拥有智能手机才能使用SingPass。她补充,基于安全,每个SingPass用户都只绑定一个电话号码,“意味着想要帮助父母的孩子们,还必须为父母亲提供一个电话号码,才能帮他们登记SingPass并进行交易,这些都加重了花费” 。 林瑞莲曾在预算案辩论上提出这项课题,建议为年长者提供低成本计划,包括让那些在使用线上账户管理有困难的人士,提供非数码服务,如设置服务柜台。 “通讯及新闻部长易华仁承认确实存在这些担忧,而最近我们也看到电信公司Telcos为年长者推出了一些基本计划。但是我认为这些计划仅限于居住在公共租赁房或社区关怀计划(ComCare)下的人们。”…

罔顾员工生命安全 园景公司认罪被重罚22万新元

本地一家园景公司Environmental Landscape Pte Ltd,因未能对地下水箱工作采取安全措施,被指触犯工作场所安全与卫生法令(Workplace Safety and Health Act,简称WSHA),公司董事长王尚领于周三(14日)代表出庭认罪后,被判罚款22万元。 人力部昨日(14日)发文告指出,意外发生在2016年7月25日傍晚6时30分,地点在双溪登加一带罗弄司芒卡(Lorong Semangka)131号的地下水箱。该公司四名员工拉曼、乌丁、维捏什、米亚(均为译名)被指示清理约3.2米深的地下水箱。该水箱主要用来储存雨水,以浇灌植物。 米亚首先以梯子爬地下水箱,而拉曼则将投光灯和插座交给米亚,并紧随米亚下水道,由乌丁垫后。由于维涅什是新进员工仍在熟悉工作环境,所以他呆在地面上工作。 当乌丁爬梯子之际,拉曼在水箱内按下插座,试图启动投光灯,不料却发生爆炸。爆炸的威力将当时正在梯子上的乌丁,连同梯子被炸飞出去。当时乌丁身体被灼伤,连忙跑到附近水池,跳入水池减轻痛苦。…