Singapore Ambassador to Japan Peter Tan Hai Chuan has issued a letter to rebut an article published by Nikkei Asian Review regarding the COVID-19 outbreak in Singapore and General Election, saying that the writer has painted “a distorted picture” as well as made false and misleading statements.

The article titled, “Coronavirus and Inequality Threaten to Unsettle Singapore Election” was written by Singaporean author Sudhir Thomas Vadaketh on 1 July, while Mr Tan’s letter to the editor-in-chief of Nikkei Asian Review was dated on 11 July and was published on the Nikkei Asian Review website on 16 July.

Ambassador denies claim over the Government’s perceived pandemic lapses led to 44,000 COVID-19 cases, saying it has acted in a “swift, proactive and vigilant manner” since outbreak start

In his article, Mr Vadaketh said that the Singapore Government’s perceived pandemic lapses have resulted in the 44,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19.

“At first glance, the PAP, which has won every election since independence in 1965, the last in 2015 with a thumping 70% vote share, looks like a shoo-in. Singaporean voters are notoriously risk-averse even in the best of times.

“Yet the government’s perceived pandemic lapses, which have led to 44,000 confirmed cases, have reminded the electorate of some long-standing grievances which opposition parties, more competent and diverse than ever before, will seek to exploit.

With the severe COVID-19 outbreak in migrant workers dormitories, Mr Vadaketh also noted that Singapore was facing the “worst humanitarian crisis since independence”, where the crisis has also helped the country to “refocus attention” on the domestic concerns such as economic model, inequality and immigration.

Responding to this, , Ambassador Tan rebutted the claim of the Government’s perceived pandemic lapses, stating that the Government has acted in a “swift, proactive and vigilant manner” where they formed the Multi-Ministry Task Force even before the COVID-19 outbreak hit Singapore.

“On the contrary, the government has acted in a swift, proactive and vigilant manner since the beginning of the pandemic. We established a Multi-Ministry Task Force, coled by two cabinet ministers, to manage the outbreak even before the first case of COVID-19 was detected on our shores.”

He explained that most of the confirmed cases are derived from the migrant workers who live in dormitories, adding that it is inevitably the “significant transmission” could be happened in any sort of environment where people gather in groups.

“The majority of our confirmed cases to date are migrant workers who live in dormitories. Inevitably, in any sort of environment where people gather in groups, there could be significant transmission. We have seen this happen in social settings, workplaces and homes. Similarly, we have seen that whether in migrant worker dormitories, or similar settings like aircraft carriers and cruise ships, there can be significant transmission of COVID-19.”

While Singapore has “committed to aggressive and extensive testing” of all migrant workers living in dormitories, the ambassador described that the Government has put in place the “active case finding and systematic clearance of migrant worker dormitories” as well as expanded the “active surveillance testing efforts” for the vulnerable groups and those who have higher exposure risk to COVID-19.

“As a result of this strategy, we have been able to identify, isolate and provide the necessary medical treatment for infected workers, prevent a wider spread of infection to the community and keep the fatality rate extremely low at below 0.1% of cases. Most of these confirmed cases are clinically well, showing mild or no symptoms. The high number of cases that we have picked up is therefore a reflection of our rigorous testing approach, which is the right and responsible thing to do.”

Ambassador denounces Mr Vadaketh for painting “a distorted picture” of PAP fetishizing GDP growth and downplaying negative consequences

Mr Vadaketh in his article also highlighted that the People’s Action Party (PAP) has been criticised for “fetishizing gross domestic product (GDP) growth and downplaying negative consequences” over the past twenty years, which had “slowly eroded Singapore’s social compact”.

“From the time the British established a colonial trading base here in 1819, Singapore has been dependent on foreign capital and labor. Yet over the past two decades critics believe the PAP has fetishized gross domestic product growth, downplaying negative consequences such as higher living costs, worsening inequality and rising nativism alongside ethnic and class conflicts, which they see as having slowly eroded Singapore’s social compact.”

In response to this, the ambassador denounced Mr Vadaketh for presenting “a distorted picture”, adding that “he fails to recognise that the government has been making continuous efforts to address the challenge of social mobility, in pursuit of an inclusive society that leaves no one behind.”

Ambassador Tan elaborated that the Government has maintained the broad-based real income growth over the past decade to continue upholding absolute mobility as well as implemented various policies, such as KidSTART, SkillsFuture in order to provide equal opportunities for the people.

On top of this, he also highlighted that the Government has enhanced support for the lower-income Singaporeans worker and retirees through Workfare, Progressive Wage Model and Silver Support.

“We have continued to strengthen support for our lower-income Singaporeans at work. Singapore provides as much as 40% on top of the wages that employers pay older lower-income workers through billion-dollar programs like Workfare. The Progressive Wage Model helps uplift workers and creates a clear, continuing ladder of skills, better jobs and better wages, something which a minimum wage cannot provide.

Our cleaners, security officers and landscape workers have seen their wages increase by 30% in real terms over the last five years. Silver Support provides an income supplement for retirees who have less in their retirement and has given 1.6 billion Singapore dollars ($1.15 billion) to this group since 2016.”

Flip-flop policy regarding the lease of Singapore’s public housing

At the same time, Mr Vadaketh had also raised issues regarding the 99-year lease of Singapore’s public housing.

He hinted that the Government had adopted the flip-flop policy on the public housing lease, in which the Government had promised for decade that the property values “will never go down” but later has confirmed that some properties “will be worthless” after the end of their 99-year leases.

“The fate of leases for Singapore’s public housing, where over 80% of the population live, is another key issue. For decades the government promised, in the words of Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore’s first prime minister after independence, that those property values “will never go down.” Many assumed it would extend their 99-year leases, as has happened in other countries, or reacquire them at fair value.

But after Lee’s death, the government confirmed that the properties, some valued at over $700,000, will be worthless when their leases end — at which point it can redevelop the land. This apparent policy flip-flop has already affected prices, and with some families’ nest eggs in terminal decline, opposition parties are coming armed with alternative housing proposals.”

Ambassador Tan then responded saying that Mr Vadaketh has made a misleading claim given that the Government has always been upfront that “when the lease for the property expires, it will revert to the state so that the land can be redeveloped to benefit future generations of Singaporeans.”

“This is the case not just for public housing but also private leasehold property. Those who buy public housing enjoy significant government subsidies on their home purchase, as well as generous subsidies on infrastructure upgrading.

Owners living in highly subsidized public housing would have derived benefit from living in these affordable flats in the course of the 99-year leases. If they no longer wish to live in their flat, they can sell it in the open market or rent it out for income. Public housing provides affordable and quality homes for many Singaporeans and is a good store of value that can supplement their retirement income.”

Ambassador questions the motives of Mr Vadaketh’s remark on the native-born citizens are well in the minority

The ambassador also took issue with Mr Vadaketh’s remark on how the native-born citizens are well in the minority.

In his article, Mr Vadaketh noted that Singapore’s population has increased over 40 per cent to 5.6 million from 1999 to 2018, “much through immigration” while adding that “native-born citizens are now well in the minority”.

Stressing that the assertion made by Mr Vadaketh is untrue, the ambassador further questioned the motives of Mr Vadaketh.

“This assertion is untrue and raises questions about Vadaketh’s motives in attempting to draw a line between Singapore-born citizens and naturalized citizens, and fuel xenophobia and social divisiveness, which run counter to the values of social harmony and inclusiveness that many Singaporeans hold dear.”

Ambassador Tan concluded his letter by expressing his hope that the Nikkei Asian Review will maintain their high-standard and professional reporting as well as avoid “being used by certain individuals to perpetuate partial and misleading opinions”.

“I am not in any way attempting to, as Ambassador Tan says, ‘fuel xenophobia and social divisiveness’,” says Mr Vadaketh

On the other hand, Mr Vadaketh also made a clarification regarding his remark on native-born citizens are well in the minority in Singapore’s total population through The Straits Times.

As the ambassador doubted his motives, Mr Vadaketh argued that he had worked long to “promote harmony and social inclusiveness in Singapore” and not “in any way attempting to” fuel xenophobia and social divisiveness.

“As the son of a naturalised citizen and a Malaya-born one, I have in my work long tried to promote harmony and social inclusiveness in Singapore.

“I am not in any way attempting to, as Ambassador Tan says, ‘fuel xenophobia and social divisiveness’.”

According to Mr Vadaketh, his remark is also based on “an approximation” in his article titled “The End Of Identity?” that published by the IPS Commons on 23 August 2012.

He claimed that the National Population and Talent Division who declined to provide him the official figure had also acknowledged this remark without dispute by that time.

Not just in Singapore, he said that the foreign-born population is a data point that analysts look to when assessing immigration and integration in the multicultural societies globally.

Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

面对四控状 男律师涉非礼偷拍裙底照

知法犯法,年轻男律师在任职的律师事务所内,被指涉及非礼和偷拍年轻女律师三次,面对四项控状。 以优秀成绩毕业于本地大学,在德尊律师事务所(Drew & Napier)任职的年轻男律师,于昨日(11月11日)被控一项非礼罪以及三项侮辱女性尊严罪名。 他全部不认罪。 受害者和被告的名字都在法官的谕令下,不得公布于媒体上,以起到保护受害者作用。 据法庭文件指出,案发时,被告和三名受害者都在同一家律师事务所工作,目前被告已经辞职,到另一家律师事务所就职。 控状指出,被告于2017年4月份,晚上8时许在公司内偷拍受害者的胸口内衣和裙底风光,此为被告首次干案。 在同年10月,被告再次涉及偷拍受害者的裙底照,甚至用其大腿触碰受害者的手臂。 指调查官诱导认罪 昨天在庭上,调查官招供时指出,指被告在去年11月录口供时,承认犯案,但是如今却反指调查官诱导他录口供,因此不承认有关的口供。 法庭因此发起审讯中的审讯,以便确定有关的口供是否能作为呈堂证据。…

酝酿社会分化加剧的“超富”新加坡社会

国内贫富之间加剧扩大的鸿沟,致使越来越多国人不禁思考,这片土地是否仍是最初为之流汗、为后代子孙奋斗的”应许之地“,还是越发变成了少数”利益相关者“高处不胜寒的巨塔? 上周四,瑞士信贷研究院(Credit Suisse Research Institute)发布2018年全球财富报告,指新加坡人的整体财富增加7.4%至1.3万亿美元(约1.8万亿新元)。每名成年人的财富增加5.3%至28万3000美元以上,全球排名第九、亚洲领先。 在2000年,成年人均财富为11万4720美元。报告指财富增值主要因素包括较高的储蓄、资产增值和2005年至2012年间的币值汇率增值。 此外,新加坡的百万富翁增加了11.2巴仙,即18万3737人。也预测未来五年该人数将以每年增加5.5巴仙,达到23万9640人。 直至今年中,我国有大约1千名财富超过5千万美元的超高净值人士,人数增加了1.1巴仙。不过,未知有关统计是否也把我国高薪内阁成员涵括在“超高净值—疯狂巨富”群体中。 正当有些人浸淫在所谓“新加坡人变得富足”的自我感觉良好,《南华早报》在采访本地学者的报导中,却提出令人不安的事实–我国社会面临不断增长的社会分化。 会遗传的贫富差距 新加坡国立大学社会学系副教授陈恩赐,在接受《南华早报》采访时表示,现在在我国,阶级和身份背景对于社会流动的影响更大。根据衡量收入差距的基尼系数(从零到一,一为最不平等),我国自1980年以来的基尼系数就一直在0.40分以上波动,在去年则达到0.417分。 英国2015年度基尼系数为0.52、美国0.506,香港在2016年得分0.539,显示在先进国中的收入不均问题迫在眉睫。…

曾出碟 为多名歌手写歌 音乐之星唐玉璇离世

曾为多名著名歌手写歌,更在新加坡和两名有人共组“闲杂人等”进行街头演唱而爆红的新加坡之星,音乐人唐玉璇于3月8日三度晕倒入院,隔日出院后,于3月10日凌晨在家中忽然逝世,享年48岁。 热爱音乐、甚至自称是为音乐而生的唐玉璇,在和“闲杂人等”另两位伙伴进行演出前,曾表示身体不适,偶尔晕眩。演出过程中,他也曾经晕了一下,随后由伙伴将他送入医院检查。 三度晕倒入院 和唐玉璇同组“闲杂人等”组合的黄绣惠,在接受媒体采访时,如是指出。她也在脸书上称,唐玉璇曾在8日当天三度晕倒,送到新加坡中央医院接受观察一个晚上,因为并没有发现任何病因,所以允许于9日出院。 她指出,医生曾表示唐玉璇的心跳和以前有点不一样,但是没有发现问题,所以让她回家休息。 唐玉璇热爱音乐,就算身体不适,也坚持要把音乐的相关事情安排好。她曾表示自己从小并没有听歌,后来到民歌餐厅驻唱,有不少人点新歌后,她才去学习。后来她在90年代,才成功第一次发片,即是和蔡淳佳、蔡礼莲推出海蝶合辑《Replugged》。 除了热爱唱歌,唐玉璇也曾经为不少著名歌手写歌,作品有刘德华《太多太多的抱歉》、彭羚《肥皂》、许茹芸《执着》和蔡淳佳《看见》等。 组团街头演出爆红 另外,唐玉璇也经营歌唱音乐学校,并和两名友人王志文和黄绣惠共组“闲杂人等”街头艺人演唱,演唱歌曲有包括华语、粤语和英文歌曲。两年前因为街头演唱视频被上载到网路上而忽然爆红,更成为《联合晚报》人气新闻,“闲杂人等”脸书粉丝也在数日内翻倍。 唐玉璇坦言这个组合其实并不太喜欢宣传,但是无可否认的,传媒的力量的确让更多人认识到他们这个组合。“我们努力三年才累积2700名粉丝,但是经过传媒报导后,三四天就增加到超过5000人,虽然很高兴,但是也有点不习惯。” 努力散播音乐力量 唐玉璇也努力散播音乐的力量,她曾经因为身体健康出状况,需要住院留医,平时也要洗肾,发现医院在公共假期非常冷清的情况。…

Police report made against Ong Ye Kung for allegedly abetting primary school child to participate in election activity

A police report has been said to be filed against People’s Action…