GE2020 was marked this time around with a number of police reports lodged by parties and citizens alike over various things from damaged campaign posters to statements made by various candidates and alleged falsehoods.

For some of these reports, the Singapore Police Force (SPF) released statements confirming that they were indeed filed. However, there are others which the SPF didn’t directly address, leaving on social media postings and screenshots showing the reports.

In total, we counted 13 reports filed during the campaign period until the Polling Day, 30 June to 10 July.

1 & 2 July 2020

The campaign period started off with a few police reports filed over damaged election posters. There were quite a few of these by both the People’s Action Party (PAP) and the Progress Singapore Party (PSP)

On 1 July, a report was filed by the PAP over one of the damage of their election posters in the area of Hougang Avenue 10. Just a day later, the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) lodged a similar police report about their damaged election posters along Bukit Batok Avenue 5 and Hougang Ave 10.

The SPF said in a statement that a 51-year old and a 13-year old were being investigated for those two separate cases.

4 & 5 July July 2020

Another poster related police report was filed by the PAP on 4 July over damaged election posters in Woodlands Street 13. This time, a 48-year old man was arrested for allegedly damaging those posters.

There were also reports made against several candidates who were running in the election. Two reports were filed, on 4 and 5 July, against Workers’ Party (WP)’s Raeesah Khan who stood for election and won in Sengkang GRC. The report alleged that she made comments on her social media pages a while back which promoted enmity between different racial and religious groups. Investigations are ongoing.

The SPF said investigations are ongoing.

6 July 2020

Following this, a citizen lodged a report against the PAP’s statement about Ms Khan. A citizen on Facebook revealed on Monday (6 July) that he has filed this report to “hold the PAP accountable for an ‘offence of promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion or race under Section 298A of the Penal Code’ as well as the spreading of online falsehoods.”

On this, the SPF released a statement to say that no offence was found after consultation with the Attorney-General’s Chambers.

7 July 2020

Another report also arose from this specifically against a Facebook user who claimed to be one of the first people to “leak” Ms Khan’s earlier social media comments which are now the subject of a police investigation. SPF confirmed on 7 July that reports were filed against the Facebook user who goes by “Abdul Malik Mohammed Ghazali” on the platform.

“The Police are looking into the alleged offences of posting comments on social media with deliberate intent to wound religious or racial feelings under Section 298 of the Penal Code and harassment under Section 4 of the Protection from Harassment Act,” the SPF asserted.

Police investigations are currently ongoing.

Separately on a similar allegation as that made against Ms Khan, another report was lodged on 7 July against PAP’s Heng Swee Keat—who contested and won in East Coast GRC—in relation to his response to a question posed to him at a student’s forum in 2019 at Nanyang Technology University where he said that he doesn’t think Singapore is ready for a non-Chinese Prime Minister.

However in this case, the SPF said that the Attorney-General’s Chambers advice was that no offence was committed and that Mr Heng’s remarks, in context, “do not evidence any intent to wound anyone’s racial feelings or promote enmity between different races.”

On 7 July, a police report was filed against PAP’s Ong Ye Kung for allegedly abetting a primary school child to participate in election activity. This was in relation to a video he had earlier shared on Facebook of him talking to a boy in school uniform. The video was taken down on 2 July after Mr Ong was informed by authorities that it is not in line with electoral rules.

The person who filed the report told TOC that the police informed him that they have begun investigations in to the matter.

8 July

PSP also lodged another poster damage police report on 8 July, this time over posters in Jurong West Street 92.

On the same day, a report was filed against PAP’s Bukit Batok SMC candidate over alleged falsehood made in a video in which Mr Pillai talked about a “scurrilous attack” against his family.”

The report alleged that there was no evidence of any video to have surfaced which “attacked” Mr Pillai’s son’s criminal history as he has said in the video. As such, the report alleged, “there is reason to believe that Murali Pillai contravened the POFMA act. He has spread fakenews based on falsehood.”

Also on 8 July, The Online Citizen (TOC) editor Terry Xu filed a police report against a commentary Facebook page Critical Spectator on Tuesday (7 July), over its posts made in relation to the ongoing General Election (GE), citing foreign intervention. In the report it was noted that Michael Petraeus is the man behind the Facebook page and that he is a Polish national.

After the report was filed, Facebook unpublished the Critical Spectator page from its platform.

10 July 2020

On 10 July, a police report was lodged by a citizen against former ambassador-at-large Bilahari Kausikan over a Facebok post he made on Cooling Off Day (9 July) in which he rebuked PSP’s Lee Hsien Yang, who is the younger son of founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. The report alleged that the post sought to “influence the public on election partisan politics”.

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Call for moratorium over plans for Bukit Brown

the following is a media release by Community for Bukit Brown: The…

MND releases Town Council Management Report for 2016

The Ministry of National Development (MND) has presented the audited financial statements…

SPF issues warning on increase in online scams

The Singapore Police Force (SPF) issued a warning on its Facebook page…

国内再传医院牙科诊所误用未完全消毒器具事件

陈笃生医院牙科诊所,被指在至少八名病患身上,曾使用未经过最后阶段消毒的牙科器具。 这也是自去年,全国牙科中心出现类似疏失后,第二次有医院发生使用未完全消毒牙科器具的疏忽。类似疏失重演令卫生部感到失望。 陈笃生医院发声明指出,他们在牙科诊所发现,有八套牙科器具,没有经过第四个、即蒸汽消毒的步骤。 而受影响的病患是在上月28日至本月5日之间,到该医院牙科诊所就医。 院方称已完成前三消毒步骤,感染风险非常低 作为预防措施,陈笃生医院牙科诊所的一些治疗程序从12月8日起已经暂停。院方已实施更多管控措施,提高工作人员的意识,强调有关全面遵守护理程序的重要性。部分门诊牙科服务将从明日起起陆续恢复。 不过院方进一步解释,牙科器具一般会经过四个步骤的清洗消毒,这八包牙科器具,已完成之前三个步骤的消毒,近乎百分百消毒,因此病患受传染风险非常低。 院方表示,他们通知了在同期间到诊所接受治疗的575个病患,向他们解答他们的担忧。 卫生部则勒令国立健保集团和陈笃生医院,加强管制措施,和检讨有关疏忽。卫生部长颜金勇则表示,该部讲研究此事件,并考虑采取进一步行动,以降低整个医疗领域再次发生类似事件的风险。 去年6月12日,我国最大的全国牙科中心,被揭发至少在72名病患身上,使用未完全消毒的牙科器具。当月到该牙科中心看诊的病患,就多大714人。 事件发生后,卫生部针对所有有牌公立和私立医疗机构的中央消毒供应部门(CSSD)进行审查,以评估是否符合规定的消毒程序。经审计结果显示,所有消毒程序都达标。