The party flags of People’s Action Party (PAP) at the roadside of Marine Crescent which were earlier put up “as part of National Day celebrations” have been removed, observed TOC’s correspondent on Saturday (11 July).

TOC earlier reported that PAP flags were being put up along Marine Crescent at around 7pm on 23 June, the same day where the date of election was announced.

After the report was made, Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) filed a request with the Elections Department (ELD) over the display of party flags.

In response, ELD said that the rules relating to the display of posters and banners under the Parliamentary Elections (Election Advertising) Regulations do not apply at this time, as the period of campaigning by political parties for the July 10 General Election (GE) has not started. For now, the display of posters and banners is governed by other legislation such as the Town Councils Act.

A brief look at the Town Councils Act seems to suggest that the act is completely silent on the display of flags and banners.  What other legislation is the ELD talking about if the Parliamentary Elections (Election Advertising) Regulations do not apply at the time?

According to Today Online’s report, a volunteer at the Marine Parade PAP branch office, who declined to be named, said that the flags put up are “within the branch perimeters”.

The volunteer told TODAY the PAP flags were put up “as part of National Day celebrations” — something which has been done every year “for the past 20 to 30 years”. There are plans to add to the 11 flags currently being displayed, said the volunteer, who added that the flags may be displayed for a longer period of time this year because “National Day celebrations are extended”.

It is interesting to note that the PAP Community Foundation Marine Parade Education Centre – which founded by the PAP – is also situated at Marine Cres. But it is a long distance away from where the flags are, as seen in the map below.

But with the immediate removal of the flags following the polling day, seems to suggest that the flags were put up for the purpose of the GE.

So did PAP violate the Parliamentary Elections (Election Advertising) Regulations by putting up the flags or not? Can we depend on ELD under the Prime Minister’s Office to be an independent agency to ensure the election is held in equal and fair manner?

Subscribe
Notify of
17 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Civic space in Singapore is “obstructed”, gov’t uses restrictive laws to silence critics: CIVICUS

The civic space in Singapore is “obstructed”, as rated by global civil…

Singapore Democratic Party urges Bukit Panjang residents to remain calm following news of transport hub cluster

The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) urges all Singaporeans to remain calm following…

Police identifies three Singaporeans as individuals involved in fatal shooting incident on Sunday

The Singapore Police Force updated its statement on facts surrounding fatal shooting…

将上诉市镇会诉讼判决 林瑞莲指王瑞杰提动议“言之过早”

上月11日,高庭法官加南拉美斯(Kannan Ramesh)宣读判词,指工人党主席林瑞莲、秘书长毕丹星和前秘书长刘程强,须为阿裕尼-后港市镇会蒙受损失,承担法律责任。 故此,副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰,于今日在国会提动议,要求刘程强和林瑞莲回避一切和阿裕尼-后港市镇会相关财政事务。 不过林瑞莲也回应,他们将对有关市镇会诉讼判决提出上诉,且截止日是在下周一(11日),故此王瑞杰的动议似乎“言之过早”。 她提醒不满判决一方有一个月期限可提出上诉。她也指出,他们仍在和律师研究有关判决,也向议会报告,他们将对此诉讼提出上诉,要求议员们拒绝王瑞杰的动议。 王瑞杰充重申议员应保持高标准诚信和责任感,在发言时多次引述高庭判决中对工人党的指责,也要求该党不该躲避,应对此做出解释。 “将近四周已过,但工人党仍保持沉默,未对此作出道歉,以及如何解决失误。”他也把问题抛向现任阿裕尼后港市镇会主席费沙和其他工人党议员,包括费沙会否对阿裕尼和后港居民道歉,以及解除林瑞莲作为市镇会副主席的职务。 他认为,如果直到上诉前什么都不做,那么可认定工人党实际上默许“不诚实和违反信托义务的行为”,甚至是共谋的。 有关市镇会从2011年7月至2015年7月间,支付了FMSS公司多达3370万元。这段期间,林瑞莲为市镇会主席,而刘程强当时为工人党秘书长。至于毕丹星当时担任市镇会招标与合约委员会成员。 去年10月初,高庭展开对工人党市镇会诉讼审讯,阿裕尼—后港市镇会(AHTC)和白沙—榜鹅市镇会(PRPTC)指责刘程强、林瑞莲、毕丹星等八造,必须对2011年5月至2015年11月期间,对第三方承包商的不当付款行为负起责任以及索偿。