Workers’ Party (WP) Yee Jenn Jong took to his Facebook on Wednesday (8 July) to denounce an article by The Straits Times which reported his fellow colleague Tan Chen Chen’s lack of credentials.

In the ST’s article, titled “What WP’s Tan Chen Chen lacks in credentials, she makes up with earnestness”, it said that Ms Tan’s credentials are “nothing to shout about”.

“On paper, Ms Tan, 38, is not exactly the kind of candidate political parties clamour for. Compared with many of the other WP candidates, her credentials are nothing to shout about,” it noted.

It highlighted that Ms Tan, who is WP’s candidate in the newly formed Punggol West SMC for GE2020, attended neighbourhood schools and scored “borderline, just 60 or 70 points” for her degree, which she did at a night school.

It also went on to say that she lacks “sophistication” compared to other candidates and stressed that she lacks proficiency in the English language. “But what she lacks in credentials and polish, she makes up with her earnestness and sincerity,” it added.

In Mr Yee’s post, he wrote, “What sort of headline is this!”, adding that it reminds him of what former prime minister and Singapore’s founding father Lee Kuan Yew had to say about former People’s Action Party (PAP) member Mah Bow Tan and the longest-serving opposition Member of Parliament, Chiam See Tong.

Lee Kuan Yew once said, “Mah Bow Tan, age 16, took his ‘O’ Levels – six distinctions, two credits.

Mr Chiam, age 18 – six credits, one pass.”

In the 1984 GE, the residents of Potong Pasir chose Chiam. Chiam won 60.28% of the votes, compared to Mah’s 39.72%. Chiam went on to serve 27 years in parliament.

As such, Mr Yee, who is contesting as part of a team of five in Marine Parade GRC for GE2020, said that he will “pick passion, commitment and resilience over paper qualifications”.

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

乐龄长期护理成本高昂 亟需提升社会保障机制

连氏基金会近期公布的研究显示,我国人口趋向老龄化同时,有越来越多年长者选择医院或疗养院以外的看护服务,致使居家式和中心式的看护服务需求增长,有必要进一步提升。 根据卫生部数据,截止去年年终,有1万4千民众在住家或中心接受看护服务,比起去年的1万2千人数有所提升。 相对地,在过去两年有约一万居民的住家看护服务获得津贴,显示乐龄群体接受长期护理的模式,正发生转变。 《海峡时报》报导上述研究,随着人口老龄化,研究显示有必要提升对乐龄群体的扶助,包括在拨款、看护能力、可负担程度、人力和立法等,都是需着眼的层面。 2017年我国65岁以上乐龄人口突破50万,预计在2030年改群体人口将翻倍。 改革乐龄护理刻不容缓 新加坡国立大学助力教授Elaine Ho向媒体披露,要打造能永续经营、健康幸福的老龄化社会,现在就必须改革,而不是等到老龄人口爆炸才行动。 Elaine Ho和Shirlena Huang共同撰写这份研究报告,两人皆来自国立大学的社会科学研究所。 有关研究采访103位人士、50个非营利和私立看护服务代表、政府代表以及乐龄看护领域的专业人士。…

Lee Hsien Yang alleges unfairness in Attorney-General’s Chambers’ prosecution against eldest son Li Shengwu regarding criticism of Singapore courts

The younger brother of Prime Minister Mr Lee Hsien Loong, Mr Lee…

“临时”了60年的刑事法(临时条款)

撰文:人权律师M.Ravi  翻译:北雁 刑事法(临时条款)(CLTPA)被“临时”延长了六十年,还算是临时条款吗?该法在1955年颁布,就连名称本身都用词不当,新加坡人又再一次被愚弄了。 我们知道,该法赋权部长,未经审讯,就可下令拘留嫌犯。这原本是殖民时代的产物,是为了对应那个时代危机的临时措施。 然而,即便国家独立后,法令还沿用至今,新加坡可说是全球唯一,把一项“临时措施”保留了超过半世纪的国家。 而最近的刑事法(临时条款)修正法案,则针对部长拘留权限附加以下条款: “针对第(1)分款【拘留令和警察监视】事项,部长的所有决策均为最终决定。” 我已经说过,让部长干预警方执法的角色,很危险。上述条文也把司法机构审查任何拘留案件的权限,排除在外,使得透过司法程序挑战变得极为困难。 简言之,就是压迫基本权利,司法机构也无法、甚至对于审查有关拘捕或警察监视令是否公正,无法起作用。 在我执业期间,曾遇过一些个案、有者年仅19岁,声称自己无辜且被人诬陷。即便辩护他们的证据很无力,但却因为类似上述的法令,他们甚至连在法庭面对审判的机会都没有。 我们既然已经有针对高利贷和私会党活动制定了严法,这种“临时”措施,就不应再扩大并延伸到更广泛的犯罪行为。 刑事法(临时条款)近期的修法,…

Vaccinated migrant worker gets infected with COVID-19; First in cluster at Pasir Panjang Terminal

On 11 April, the Ministry of Health (MOH) classified a COVID-19 case…