Last week during the GE2020 debate between three alternative parties and the People’s Action Party, PAP’s Dr Balakrishnan and Singapore Democratic Party’s (SDP) Dr Chee participated in a heated exchange on the issue of increasing Singapore’s population to 10 million.

Dr Chee questioned the PAP candidate about what Mr Heng Swee Keat had said in an earlier interview, which Dr Chee indicated that Mr Heng was “toying” with the idea of increasing the country’s population to 10 million.

To this, Dr Balakrishnan said: “Let me state for the record. We will never have 10 million. We won’t even have 6.9 million.”

Following that, Mr Heng himself took to Facebook the next morning to deny that he targets for a 10-million population.

However, SDP followed up with a statement saying that the The Straits Times published an article in March 2019, and the newspaper quoted: “[Mr Heng] cited former chief planner Liu Thai Ker, who said in 2014 that Singapore should plan for 10 million people for it to remain sustainable in the long term.”

To this, the statement read, “The average person reading the report would conclude that Mr Heng was is, indeed, “toying with the idea” of a 10 million population as indicated by Dr Chee.”

After all that, the POFMA office issued correction directions under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) for “false statements of fact claiming that a statement made by Dr Cheong Koon Hean at the IPS-Nathan Lectures in 2018 suggested that our population would increase to 10 million by 2030”.

The orders were issued to the SDP as well as TOC and the Facebook pages of Peoples Voice political Party and Sin Rak Sin Party on the instructions of the alternate authority for the Minister for National Development, permanent secretary Ow Foong Pheng.

The order noted, “These allegations are false. Dr Cheong made no statement suggesting that our population would increase to 10 million by 2030,” it said. “This is a continuation of falsehoods alleging that the Government has a population target of 10 million, which the Government has clarified.”

In response, the SDP—which complied with the order but are applying to cancel it—said in a statement, “quote was taken verbatim from the article” that was published in the Straits Times (ST) on 20 April 2018, it cited the quote: “Even if the increase that Dr Cheong proposed was in terms of ‘liveable density’ instead of population density, this would imply that the total population was planned to go from 5.7 million (11,000 per liveable sq km implying a liveable area of 518 sq km) to 6.97 million (13,700 per sq km with no increase in liveable area) in 2030”.

Subsequently, a whistleblower has reached out to TOC to highlight that there are “concrete” plans within the civil service to increase the population of Singapore by bringing in more foreigner.

The person said that these plans—which were circulated before the COVID-19 pandemic—included forcing locals to integrate with foreigners in the community despite knowing it poses a significant challenge.

According to a People’s Association (PA) Workplan Seminar document on 15 January, sighted by TOC and which is based on PA’s Community Masterplan 2025, a key trend highlighted in the PA’s plan for the next five years include “greater diversity” within the community.

The document noted: “Singapore citizens (SCs) will come across more Employment/S/Dependent-Pass holders in our neighbourhoods.”

The source also told us that during the seminar, PA Dean Hin Cheong Foong explicitly said that Singaporeans must be prepared to be outnumbered by foreigners given the sharp influx. Mr Hin allegedly said that this is a “sensitive” matter but told those present that they must accept reality.

TOC has reached out the PA to confirm. We have yet to receive a response.

Subscribe
Notify of
40 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Body of the person who died Singapore bus accident brought back to his own village

The news that a young man from Tamil Nadu pitifully died last…

Netizens question the need of destroying greenery to build another tourism development in Singapore

Come 2026, the promising Jurong Lake District will be receiving a new…

Lee Weiling asks whether the cabinet committee to consider govt decision on 38 Oxley Road a secret

In a Facebook post on Friday afternoon, Dr Lee Weiling brings up…

李显龙的承诺

回溯2004年8月,已故建国总理李光耀之子李显龙,正式接替吴作栋成为新加坡第三任总理。他认为这是新加坡在后冷战时代,向后独立世代的传承转变。 在当时的就职演说中,他曾表示,在全球化时代中,新加坡必须突破旧思维,采取大胆、创新的作法,因应全新的环境;也承诺营造更为开放和包容的社会。 “我们也许是个小岛国,但我们是和全球连接的国际化都会,提供令人振奋的机遇和体验。我们是开放、多元族群的大都会社会。” 他也表示将投资在青年群体,培育他们“独立思考、自信开拓、热衷追求理想”,使他们成为善良、正直的成年,提供教育机会,广开机遇和希望的大门。 他也认为,民众应有表达不同意见的自由,并乐于参加激烈辩论。 而在2004年的国庆群众大会演说,李显龙也重提同样的论述和价值观,强调政府理应鼓励民间的参与和辩论,重申营造开放和更为包容的社会。 “我们有演说者角落,允许更多的讨论。看看报章的专栏、评论,辩论的程度远超过以往甚至是国会,但我们可以做得更多。” 为实现这一目标,他认为需要拥有可信任、仰赖的领袖领导的“诚实和能干政府”;同时倡议让每个公民都能发挥潜能,一同建设和提升新加坡这个家园。 15年过去了,说话可算话? 15年过去了,看看今日在总理李显龙领导下的新加坡,可曾履行他当年的承诺和倡议? 先看看鼓励开放包容、广开言路,鼓励更为激烈的辩论,新加坡在这方面看来乏善可陈,2018/2019世界新闻自由指数中,新加坡在179国中,仅排名151。 更甭说今年国会还通过了令人诟病的“泼马”(防假消息法POFMA),尽管民间、公民组织、法律界人士已作出多次疾呼,担忧“泼马”将赋予部长更大权力,来裁定何谓假消息,缺乏制衡;担忧新法将进一步侵害言论自由,产生寒蝉效应。…