A People’s Action Party (PAP) candidate  was criticized by the netizens over his “elitist” remark about employment for older Singaporeans during the Straight Talk with PAP held on Thursday (2 July).

During the PAP’s talk show, Mohd Fahmi Aliman, who is running in Marine Parade GRC was asked by the moderator to share his experience of walking on the ground.

Noting that his focus of campaigning is about low-wage workers, the PAP’s new candidate then shared a story of how he helped a 55-year-old man who lost his job for two months “move on” from a dishwasher to cleaner.

According to Mr Fahmi, the 55-year-old, who is the sole-breadwinner of family was out of job for 2 months due to COVID-19 pandemic.

In light of this, Mr Fahmi said they helped the man through career coaching while helping him with certain training and upskilling, in order to help them find a job through job-matching.

“So after that, in about two, three weeks later, he got a job. So initially he was a dishwasher, cleaning things…so is that particular group and is 55 years old imagine…and after that when we help him, he moved on to become a cleaner and he got pay increment in that sense,” he said.

He then continues, “And that actually is the good story that (we) can tell people, at that age if you really want to step out of your comfort zone, you look for opportunity for you to train, you look for NTUC… the people will be there to help you. This is where we will help and then find your job, (there are) many of (such) stories.”

Mr Fahmi was the former deputy chief executive of the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore, and currently is the director of the National Trades Union Congress’ administration and research unit.

Following this, a Facebook post with the video of Mr Fahmi’s making this remark has garnered much criticism from netizens.

The post came with the caption: “PAP elitist mindset: ‘From a dishwasher to cleaner, a good story to tell’. Fahmi Aliman, disappointed in you for such remarks. That’s not upscaling low wage workers.”

The netizens mocked Mr Fahmi for the story he told about “upgrading a 55 year-old sole breadwinner from dishwasher to cleaner”, saying that it’s pathetic that there is no greater significance to the story than that the retired-aged have to continue working to earn their livelihood.

Some netizens also criticised it as a failure of a country that the elderly are forced to work even after the age of retirement even as some may even have some savings in their CPF.

“So the gloomy future for Singaporeans moving forward after GE2020 esp[ecially] for those out of jobs after aged 55 years will likely be looking at filling up cleaners, dishwashers, Grab jobs while most of the senior and managerial jobs are likely to be given to PMETs instead,” one netizen wrote.

The netizens pointed out that “it is such a shame” that this first world country doesn’t appreciate older generation. They said that other first world countries will provide pensions or CPF scheme for retirement and the dishwasher jobs are definitely not for retirees.

A handful of netizens also said that Mr Fahmi should fight for partial CPF withdrawal for the elderly rather than help them to “move on or upgrade” their job with no minimum wage.

Subscribe
Notify of
26 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Doctors raise flag on Singaporeans’ stress level

A report in the Straits Times (14 April 2014) says “more young…

NSP Tony Tan questions financial prudence and MOM’s ergonomic designer chairs

This letter is sent to us by National Solidarity Party’s Mr Tony…

英兰妮为唯才是举背书 为何不谈德才兼备?

上周四(18日),总理公署部长英兰妮席由国大文学暨社会科学院社会服务研究中心主办,探讨如何援助低收入家庭。期间她表示,第四代政府领导班子的任务,是为国人在每个人生阶段创造机会,确保一个人的成就不取决于出身。 英兰妮兼任财政部及教育部第二部长。她说,不平等和社会流动问题早在1965年的“新加坡独立宣言”中就已提到。不同的是当年大家一样穷,随着经济发展,不同收入的家庭累积资源不均,大家因此关注底层孩子的起跑点会越来越落于人后,妨碍社会流动。 不过,本地中文媒体未提及英兰妮针对“唯才是举”(meritocracy)阐述的看法。本地英语媒体都有报导,英兰妮为唯才是举制背书,认为重新审视唯才是举制不是正确的做法。 记者节译刊载于《海峡时报》的英兰妮致辞稿,在演讲中英兰妮指出,唯才是举根据个人表现能力委任职务,能遏制贪腐和裙带关系,如果废除掉唯才是举制度,就等同邀请那些弊端腐蚀国家的体制。 “每个人都想达成最佳成就” “哪个父母不想孩子成龙成凤?学生们也有自己的理想抱负。每一代人都希望能达致最佳的成就,阻止他们是不对的。” 英兰妮辩护,问题的关键并不是唯才是举制,而是虽然国家和政府已经尽力提供平等机会,但是来自低收入和弱势背景的群体,仍难以跻身获得这些机会。 “所以,我们的方针不应该是为往上爬设顶限;要缩减鸿沟让大家可以一起向上,应改善那些较弱势一群的机遇、提供充分的机会。让唯才是举制发挥作用。” 她补充,与此同时也需要有多元管道来追求事业和成就,确保持续的社会流动。“有些人脚步较快,有些较慢;有者可能走相似的道路,有者走较少走的小径。在他们自身的努力,如果需要政府或他人的支持下,大家最终都能取得好的结果–当然不一定是同样的成果。” 所以,政府的措施是双重的,英兰妮强调政府一方面继续加强对少数群体的支持,其次则继续建设在每个人生阶段“充满机遇的社会”。 政治精英对唯才是举制爱不释手 新加坡的政治精英始终舍不得唯才是举制。有多少年来,我们奉唯才是举之名,精英群体都被被行销成有才干、有智慧、有表现绩效的精英,因为他们闪亮的奖学金、受过英语教育、世家背景和一大串的奖项和(军事)资历,就更容易被纳入精英圈子中。…