Source: Hwa Chong Institution / Facebook

A message sent on Hwa Chong Institution’s (HCI) Integrated e-Message Board to all its junior college (JC) one and two students ‘advised (them) to refrain from posting or reposting messages, tweets,  posts, web links, photos, videos, anything pertaining to the Singapore General Elections (GE) 2020 on both their private social media platforms, and any social media platforms associated with the school”. 

The messagel subject read: [Discipline] Advice with regards to Student Online Behavior for the Singapore General Election 2020. 

It was sent to the cohorts on Monday night at 10.30pm (29 June). 

The reason cited in the email was “the context of these (social media activities) do not allow longer, more nuanced responses”, and the issues pertaining to the GE tend to be more complex. 

In the concluding paragraph, HCI expressed concern for students who may be involved in “some unfortunate incidents” and asked of students to inform them should they discover any such online behaviors by fellow JC mates, so that the school “would try their best to help the affected students”. 

Most of the comments expressed on Facebook vocalised disapproval of an education institution seeking to censor their students and controlling their private online activity.

In HCI’s Mission and Vision statement written on its school site, it strives to “nurture leaders in Research, Industry and Government to serve the nation”, and “Empower students to Live with Passion and Lead with Compassion”. One of its core values also implored students to “have a social responsibility and duty to serve the community and nation”, and “develop a Synthesising Mind, i.e. to draw, process and transform salient and reliable information from different sources—both offline and online—into practical knowledge that benefits the larger community”. 

TOC reached out to HCI and though the spokesperson did not respond to queries on the disciplinary actions the students will face if they engaged in online behaviour, HCI provided this official statement on Friday evening (3 July): 

At Hwa Chong Institution, it is important to us that our students are engaged in society and in public life. We see it as part of our responsibility to educate students on national issues so that they grow to become informed citizens. For example, the school‘s Student National Education Council (SNEC), which seeks to enhance civic-mindedness and the understanding of national issues, conducts regular student-led dialogues and other activities. During General Paper lessons, robust discussions on national and civic matters also take place often.

We certainly do not want our students to be apathetic regarding national issues. But because of their youth, we also do not want them to be inadvertently embroiled in agendas beyond their control. Our intention is not to silence students’ voices, nor to curb their interest in national issues. Instead, we encourage our students to engage actively in discussions and even debates on national issues, in a safe environment.

The platforms used and the timing for such discourse are important considerations. It is the school’s position that social media  is not a suitable platform for students to be discussing their views on national issues, especially during an election period. Students’ posts could be screen-captured, taken out of context and circulated further, even if the original posts were published in their private accounts. Such digital footprints could remain even if the posts were removed.

Therefore, the advice we have given our students serves to remind them of the importance of exercising care and sensitivity on all social media platforms, even on their own private accounts, given the public nature of social media.

The school has defended its position, by saying social media was not a good platform to discuss national issues during campaign season.

Edit: We apologise for the statement which noted that the school did not provide a response and have edited the piece to reflect that.

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Prof Paul Tambyah addresses public concerns on COVID-19 vaccines in his latest Facebook live session

In Part 2 of the ‘Ask Paul Anything‘ session live-streamed on his Facebook…

林学芬代表律师团呈21页辩词 撼总检署500页投诉

李显扬妻子林学芬的律师代表团队,针对总检察署投诉林学芬“行为失当”的指控,已提呈21页的辩词。 今年初,总检察署针对李显扬妻子林学芬,为建国总理李光耀准备遗嘱一事,向新加坡律师公会提呈逾500页的投诉信。 总理弟弟李显扬是于今日在脸书更新有关诉讼的进展。他指出总检察署的投诉,也重复了过去李显龙在“神秘的部长委员会”作出的指控。 他不忘揶揄,如果总理李显龙对父亲遗嘱有意见,当年何不与父亲及弟妹们坐下来讨论,更何况他那时身旁有私人律师黄鲁胜(现任总检察长),这么久以来都没有提出投诉。 总检察署指林学芬作为专业律师,在为李光耀准备遗嘱一事,有失职之嫌的表面证据,表面触犯法律专业(专业行为规章)第25节条文和第46节条文。 准则列明律师应该避免陷入利益冲突中。 当局认为,林学芬在李光耀最后一份遗嘱,以李显扬作为受益人的情况下准备遗嘱,并安排李光耀执行,而李显扬获得的份额有增加。 同时,总检察署解释,把林学芬可能专业行为失当的个案提呈律师公会,与当局处理其他类似事件的做法一致。 但此前李显扬已回应,其妻子从未担任李光耀的律师,父亲的遗嘱在五年前就已执行。当父亲完成遗嘱后,告知全家和他的律师,遗嘱由李&李律师事务所保管。 而早在本周一(8日),李显扬也宣布前总检察长温长明教授,已同意代表其妻子林学芬进行辩护。 过去,李显扬曾抨击指部长委员会“即不透明也不恰当”,也称李显龙企图以委员会绕过司法制度。他也人物李显龙通过其阁僚组成的委员会,处理他对“私人家事”的不满。 “这(委员会)没经过司法程序的秘密攻击,旨在削弱我们父亲最后一份遗嘱,及他毫不动摇的遗愿。”

由BTG控股强制收购 BreadTalk周五除牌下市

经由BTG控股公司强制收购后,我国大型餐饮业上市公司面包物语集团(BreadTalk)宣布将于周五(6月5日)自新加坡交易所退市! 该集团在周三的交易所文件中指出,有关退市将于周五早上9时正生效。而在申请退市之前,集团的股票交易已经于4月21日停止。 其实,该集团自2019年就面对了580万元的净亏损,最近受到疫情影响,财务压力加剧。本年初,该集团在交易所的文件中也提到,其在新加坡、中国和香港等主要市场内的运营都充满了挑战。 而在3月份,面包物语集团宣布削减了高级和中层管理员的薪金,员工的薪金也从3月至6月,面对约10至50巴仙的削减。 面包物语集团主席郭明忠在今年2月曾提出自愿有条件式收购献议(Voluntary conditional cash offer),让通过旗下,由他本人、其妻子李丽玲和泰国酒店和休闲集团美诺国际集团(Minor International)所持有的特殊目的实体(special purpose vehicle),BTG控股公司提出,以每股0.77元的收购献议将集团私有化,并在之后将集团除牌下市。

Focus: Earth – An interview with ACRES

Animal protection and welfare is often met with cynicism. People usually find…