While speaking at the first constituency political broadcast for Bukit Panjang SMC, Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) and People’s Action Party (PAP) voiced contrasting points on the construction of LRT at the area.

The SDP candidate for Bukit Panjang SMC Dr Paul Tambyah said that in 2017, Mr Khaw Boon Wan, who was the Transport Minister, said that “the Bukit Panjang LRT was an ‘after thought’, and it was constructed due to ‘political pressure’”.

He continued, “Now, no one we talked to has admitted to putting political pressure for the LRT and this leads me to wonder who exactly chooses the various improvement projects for the town.”

Dr Tambyah went on to state that PAP may confuse the people with the “cooperation” but it cannot deny residents with “necessary services”, regardless of who wins the GE.

As such, SDP’s chairman said that the party promised that it will run the Town Council on its own with “active participation of residents”.

“We will transparently demand all accounts be released to ensure a smooth transition. There will be no more investments in toxic financial products,” the infectious diseases expert said at the live broadcast which was telecasted on MediaCorp on Friday night (3 July).

Conversely, the candidate for PAP at Bukit Panjang SMC Liang Eng Hwa pointed out that the constituency have improved tremendously over the last decade, especially in the area of public transport.

He said that he helped to “secure a number of new bus services like 972, 973, 976 and others, and as well as the S$344 LRT upgrade”.

Mr Liang also stated that Bukit Panjang’s own polyclinic will be build “soon” at the town, and “the second hawker centre is in the works”.

During the broadcast, Dr Tambyah also reiterated SDP’s “Four Yes, One No” campaign for the GE, in which the party is looking at suspending GST, providing retrenchment benefits for those who lost their jobs due to the pandemic, offering income to retirees over the age of 65 and putting people first. As for the One No, SDP is rejecting the plan of 10 million population.

He also slammed the PAP for holding a GE in the midst of a global pandemic.

“The PAP has recklessly decided to risk the public’s health and hold an election in the middle of a pandemic. They want to repeat the results of 2001, held soon after the 9/11, and this time, wipeout the opposition, which would be a disaster for Singapore,” he explained.

On the other hand, Mr Liang said that as Bukit Panjang enters into its 30th year, the party said it has to focus on investing into its “vibrancy and sustainability” as well as “upgrade and renew our precincts, and our blocks”.

He also added that he will help young job seekers and workers above the age of 40 to increase their employability.

“I will work with you to improve your employability; to tap on the various Jobs & Skills programmes to assist you,” he said.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

去年出生率跌八年来最低点 政策、生活成本皆影响生育意愿

去年我国婴儿出生率降到八年来的最低点,加剧人口老化问题。 据移民及关卡局2018年出生死亡统计显示,去年共登记了3万9039名新生儿,比2017年减少了1.5巴仙。 该报告也指出去年的死亡人数增加了1.8巴仙,从2017年的2万零905人增加到2万1282人。 人口老龄化意味着自1998年死亡人数到达1万5657人后,死亡人数一直呈上升趋势。 我国的总生育率也从2017年的1.16,降到去年的1.14,远低于国际上认可的育龄妇女平均生2.1个孩子的生育率。 根据经济学人智库(EIU)发布的2019年全球生活成本指数,新加坡连续5年成为全球生活成本最高的城市,新加坡居民在租房购房、医药、汽车价格等方面的花销,平均比纽约居民高出约七巴仙。 总理办公室在2016年的婚姻和家庭育子普查,有61巴仙受访者提及,经济能力因素是导致他们不想要、或不想多生孩子的主要原因。然而,过去仍有行动党议员如宏茂桥集选区议员杰乐(Darryl David),在访谈时指“从未有人告诉他,因为生活成本太高而不想要生孩子。” 此前,也有网民形容生养孩子如同“马拉松赛”,要不要生孩子,是很私人的决定,但是决定过程也经过多方面的考量,包括:在高生活水平的新加坡,一个年轻家庭的开销;政府亲外来人才的政策,都可能影响孩子未来就业和前途是否稳定的机会成本。 政策、生活成本等因素影响生育意愿 新加坡国立大学社会学家陈恩赐副教授表示,出生率的下降趋势将普遍持续,这是一个值得关注的问题,因为要确保维持充足的经济活力,并支持老龄化人口,补充人口是必须的。 新加坡社会科学院社会学家康顺雄指出,出生率反映了当前的社会经济趋势,如更多的年轻人选择单身、晚婚和高龄产子等。…

MOM: Resident employment growth slowed somewhat in 2019 alongside increased unemployment

Despite the slightly slower employment growth, more Singapore residents still held jobs…

Free tertiary Tuition Grant Scheme provided by govt to foreign students backfires

The free Tuition Grant Scheme (TGS) was introduced by the Government to…

AGO: MINDEF invested $50.26 million without approval of its Board of Trustees

In its audit report for Financial Year 2015/2016 which was published on…