Photo: Terry Xu

The Singapore Democratic Party’s (SDP) chairman Paul Tambyah said that the party can fund the pledges in its “Four Yes, One No” general election (GE) campaign without dipping into the country’s reserves.

He said this in reference to the three components of its GE campaign, which are to suspend GST till 2021, pay retrenchment benefits as well as to provide retirees over 65 with a monthly income of S$500.

“You do not touch the reserves. The reserves are the principle,” Dr Tambyah said on Thursday (2 July) while speaking to residents at an HDB block in Bangkit Road.

Although the exact amount in the country’s reserves remain as a secret, the chairman estimated it to be around S$1 trillion.

By using an analogy of getting interest from a fixed deposit account, Dr Tambyah explained that SDP is proposing to use the Net Investment Return Contribution (NIRC) for its programmes.

Dr Tambyah made this comment after People’s Action Party (PAP) candidate Vivian Balakrishnan asked the party’s chief Dr Chee Soon Juan at a live debate telecasted on national television on how the alternative party plans to fund its pledges.

Dr Balakrishnan said, “I think my voters want to know that the total size of the bill is, and who bears it. Some of your proposals have got very big holes, in term of fiscal deficits, so please enlighten us.”

If that’s not all, the PAP candidate for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC also stated that SDP’s proposal of suspending GST will result to creating an S$11 billion fiscal gap yearly, and this is something that has to be accounted for.

To this, Dr Tambyah said that the party’s proposals for retrenchment benefits and monthly income for retirees would add up to a total of S$5 billion. He also noted the GST shortfall cited by Dr Balakrishnan.

The infectious diseases expert suggested raising the rate for the NIRC in order to finance the party’s programmes.

According to the Ministry of Finance’s website, there are two components to the NIRC—up to 50 percent of the Net Investment Returns (NIR) on the net assets invested by GIC, the Monetary Authority of Singapore and Temasek Holdings; and up to 50 percent of the Net Investment Income (NII) come from past reserves from the remaining assets.

“If we increase that to 75 per cent, that increases another $15 billion, which can come just purely from the interest without touching the capital. So that is the primary source where we are going to get funding for these two (SDP) programmes,” said Dr Tambyah, who was using his estimate for the reserves in his calculations.

He also guaranteed voters that the pledges in SDP’s “Four Yes, One No” campaign are not a “sinkhole”.

The SDP candidate for Bukit Panjang SMC added that the money given to those in the retrenchment benefits as well as retirees will be recirculated back into the local economy.

“So say you have a retiree, you give him $500, what is he going to do? He’s going to spend the money in the hawker centre, he is going to spend the money in the shops, he is going to spend the money in Bukit Panjang. He’s not going to put the money in the Cayman Islands or some Swiss bank account where it goes out of the country,” Dr Tambyah said.

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

已涉刑事法典509 律师点评对涉事国大男生惩处“不寻常”

新加坡国立大学一名女生冲凉被偷拍,不过校方的惩处方式引来各界非议,除了逾四万人联署要求家中对涉案男生惩罚,教育部长王乙康也表态认为校方在此事采取的处分“明显不足”。 对于涉案男生获得的惩处,一些律师也在接受《海峡时报》采访表达观点,认为有鉴于其他案例的涉事者都被提控,但有关涉事男生有条件警告,“似乎不寻常”。 去年11月,一名国大23岁的国大传播系四年级女学生,在新该校尤索夫宿舍,发现自己被人用手机偷拍,女事主事后向校园保安人员投诉,并且报警处理。她称,校舍电眼拍到男生闯入不同宿舍浴室隔间寻找下手对象,他们后来也在男生手机里找到她冲凉的视频,这些证据都由校方交给警方处理。 女生称,警方接着花了两个月的时间彻查,最终向男生发出有条件的严厉警告(conditional stern warning):男生在12个月内不得重犯,否则可能在原有的罪名上,连带任何新的罪行一起被提控。 而国大校方对于男生的惩处,则是勒令停学一个学期、接受强制辅导、不让他进入尤索夫宿舍,并要他写道歉信给受害女生马芸。 至于律师对此事则点评道,即便对于性骚扰犯罪初犯者,这样的惩处很罕见,因为在刑事法典509条文下,“侵犯女性尊严”会构成罪行。 仅接警告   未经司法审讯 赢必胜法律事务所(Invictus Law…

放于利而行, 多怨──从部长薪金调整谈起

~by: 陳胤豪 ~ 「政治职位薪金检讨委员会」最近公布的检讨报告,其中仍以企业界顶薪为计算基准的做法,引发争议。反对意见一方面认为新薪资的绝对数字还是过高,另一方面则认为标准不够合理,有违从政者的奉献精神。 委员会的主要考虑则是:薪金必须具有「竞争力」,以免「适当人才」对从政望之却步。(Salaries must be competitive so that people of…

SG50: 50 Things you can bet that are not going to change in 2015

By a Concerned citizen SG50: 50 Things you can bet that are…

李显扬:先打倒冠病19 选举须暂缓

(翻译自李显扬刊载于《马来邮报》的评论) 基于冠状病毒19 本地传播病例已超过入境病例,新加坡目前已启动“断路器”式的半封锁措施。本月3日,总理李显龙称关闭学校、非必要服务商店和工作场所的措施,旨在防堵感染传播。 经过数周的担忧后,许多国人终于松了一口气,当局采取更严谨措施来保护他们免受病毒侵害。然而,仍然有强烈的感觉,在这场健康危机的关键时刻,国家的关注重心被迫分散。 4月7日,当国人将在“阻断”措施下准备呆在家里,人民行动党(PAP)却将在国会推动通过《国会选举(冠病19特别安排)法案》。 这法案似乎显示,行动党把它和李总理的利益凌驾于家国之上。执政党似乎仍执迷于在还有整整一年任期的情况下,如何在疫情下召开选举,更何况世卫组织(WHO)已宣称这场疫情为“您能想象到的最强劲敌”。 敦促国人“相信自己为国家利益而非个人”,但李总理却无法放下即将举行的选举,令人莫名其妙。 既然行动党不太可能败选,为何那么焦急于选举?难道是畏惧经济衰退的恶果?需提出的问题是:政府是否过于被动或做得太少,只是为了避免惊动人民或限制对经济的损失?有多大程度因为提早选举的渴望而分神? 当前,新加坡理应得到总理和他团队的全盘关注,对那些每日面对感染风险的前线医护人员,予以尊重。然而, 当新感染群仍在涌现,执政党却把宝贵的时间精力都浪费在选举安排上。 新加坡应对疫情的手法获得世界赞许,也提及过去2003年SARS疫情习得许多宝贵经验。SARS疫情时,出现首位病患的26天后,就关闭学校。但这一次,自1月23日出现首宗病例以来,过了70天才关闭。这就不能怪国人的质疑:如果SARS是一场教训,何以会出现如此过度的拖延? SARS疫情出现238例确诊病例。但今年4月1日冠病19确诊人数就破千,截至4日已达到1114例。这可不同于其他战疫。冠病19比起SARS更具传染力,感染链也极其困难打破。为提早选举分心,行动党是否失察?国人是否感受到政府有把公民的福祉摆在首位?…