The Singapore People’s Party (SPP) candidate for Bishan Toa-Payoh GRC Williamson Lee revealed that the posters of People’s Action Party (PAP) were being put up without stickers issued by Election Department (ELD), which appears to be violation of election rules.

In a Facebook post on Wednesday (1 July), Mr Lee who is also the Party’s vice-chairman described that many PAP’s posters were already put up when the SPP’s team rolled out the lorries.

“But that in itself is nothing new. It is trite that the PAP is well resourced and we are a small but strong team,” he commented.

He then pointed out that after his team finished their outreach activities at their contesting constituency, they have discovered many of the posters put up by the PAP did not have the ELD sticker.

According to Mr Lee, all the posters and banners that are being put up must be accompanied with a sticker that is issued by ELD and can only be collected after nomination.

The purpose of the sticker, he said is to limit the number of posters and banners one can put up with the intention of trying and leveling the playing field.

“If one is allowed to put up banners without stickers, then of course they can ‘flood’ the GRC with an seemingly unlimited number of posters,” he added.

The Party’s vice-chairman also revealed that PAP has failed to comply with the new rules which required them to put their posters at a height of at least 2.2 metre.

“We have seen many instances where the PAP has failed to comply with the requirement to put posters at a height of at least 2.2 m (a new requirement this GE) – however, this is an understandable error as we can’t be expected to measure the height of every placement and some [estimation] is inevitable,” he noted.

He continues, “However, for posters to be put up without stickers – this is a breach of the regulations that serve to level the playing field.”

Mr Lee said that he has emailed the ELD regarding this issue and encouraged Singaporeans to report to ELD if they come across any posters that breaches election regulations.

He ended his post saying, “The odds have always been stacked against us, that is nothing new. As we have always done, we will continue to fight the odds and strive for A Better Tomorrow.”

Meanwhile the Party’s member Khan Osman Sulaiman also brought up this issue on his Facebook post today.

Mr Osman stressed that the alternative parties will need some time to put up their posters during every election time as compared with PAP, their posters “are always quick off the ground”.

“No difference to this time round of the election. I saw that the PAP posters are already up once nomination closed. How is that possible? Lightning-quick manpower,” he wrote.

Mr Osman went on to say, “But upon closer inspection, these posters have no ELD stickers on it which is a violation of election rules. That explains why the PAP has been able to put up their posters quickly.”,

He added that this was what happened at Bishan Toa Payoh and they have informed the elections department.

Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Blind woman’s one-day earnings allegedly lost in a robbery incident in Yishun MRT

On Wednesday (1 May), a netizen that goes by the name Jessica…

【为巴蒂平反】控方曾阻挠代表律师 提出巴蒂投诉雇主廖文良一事

樟宜机场集团主席廖文良,指控印尼籍前女佣巴蒂偷窃超过五万元财务,导致巴蒂在去年3月被判监。案件直至今年4日获得高庭法官平反,改判无罪。 除了先前的四项控状,巴蒂的第五项控状也在今日(8日)获撤销,巴蒂总算摆脱缠身四年的官司,恢复自由身。 根据高庭法官陈成安的判词,廖家父子报警可能存在“不当意图”(improper motives),被告有充分理由投诉人力部,而廖家“先下手为强”将他开除。 巴蒂在2017年10月,向人力部申诉被雇主廖文良家属,不当调派到其他地点工作。根据规定,除了工作准证列明的住宅地址,雇主是不能非法调派女佣到其他地点工作的。 然而,若回溯两年前,巴蒂代表律师阿尼尔(Anil Balchandani )与控方在法庭的交锋,控方曾阻止阿尼尔提出巴蒂有意向人力部投诉的议题。 当时,法官和署理检控官Tan Yanying ,还认为此事与申诉“毫无关联”。当时阿尼尔也毫不客气回击,控方不愿此事在法院提及,恐怕是担心“不知后事如何进展。” 阿尼尔也强调,巴蒂向人力部投诉廖文良,与审讯很有关系,也和巴蒂被开除有关联。…

Foodfare’s statement regarding Old Airport Road Hawker Centre contradictory to details stated on its website?

NTUC Foodfare, the agent that manages the Old Airport Road Food Centre,…

MSF on court decision to reject adoption bid by father

The Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) in its comments on…