On Wednesday (24 June), Secretary-General of the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) Dr Tan Cheng Bock noted that the National Environment Agency (NEA) told the party it is withdrawing its warning to the party over an incident on Sunday (21 June) when a member of the public complained that a few PSP members had allegedly violated safe distancing measures during a walkabout.

Before the party’s visit to Block 358 Bukit Batok Street 31, a member of public had complained that more than five party members had gathered at a coffee shop. A man who identified himself as an NEA officer approached the group before taking down the details of the five politicians as well as one reporter who was covering the walkabout.

The man actually turned out to be a community volunteer with the agency who has been trained as an SG Clean Ambassador, said the NEA in a statement following the incident on Sunday.

The NEA noted in the statement that it is “looking into the circumstances of the case, including if there was a violation of safe distancing measures as reported”, adding that as of now “no fine will be imposed on PSP with regard to the reported breach of safe distancing regulations on June 21, 2020”.

During a press conference on Tuesday (23 June), Dr Tan was asked for his comment on the incident and how the party will be conducting its walkabouts. He stated that the NEA told the party that it had withdrawn its warning, before commenting that the incident highlights the irresponsibility of holding a General Election right now amid a global pandemic.

He said, “Actually NEA has already told us that they will withdraw the so-called wrongdoing that we did, but I want to let you know that this particular incident highlights an important aspect of COVID-19. Frankly speaking, I think it’s very irresponsible to hold a General Election at this time. We must always consider the people first, but unfortunately, politics has overtaken all these considerations.”

“I’m saying this not because I fear the General Elections. I have fought seven elections, I am not worried about the fight. But my priority is with the people and WHO has already warned us of the coming dangerous spikes that could occur,” Dr Tan stressed, adding that it is “not wise” for an election to be held now.

“We are talking about small confined space where during an election, everybody has to vote and whatever measures you take, like this current five person restriction and so on…I wonder how they are actually going to get this implemented properly,” he remarked.

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Workers’ Party Sengkang MPs receives a “mountain of rice pack” from public after donation call for needy families in CNY

SINGAPORE —  Members of Parliament (MP) from the Workers’ Party were heartened…

SG Turf Facebook page shares case of unfair treatment suffered by a tenant in a mall due to landlord

On Thursday (28 May), Facebook page SG Turf – Singapore Tenants United…

以宪法挑战刑事诽谤控状被驳回 迪哥达代表律师将提刑事动议

因为一篇刊载在《网络公民》的文章,曾在去年12月和本社总编许渊臣一同被控刑事诽谤的35岁男子迪哥达(Daniel de Costa),针对其指控作出宪法挑战(constitutional challenge)。 不过,今日法庭驳回了迪哥达的申请。在抗辩中,控方强调迪哥斯达因破坏内阁成员名誉,被控刑事诽谤。而哥斯达诽谤的指涉对象,是内阁成员,而不是内阁本身,而法官也赞同控方的立场。 迪哥达由律师拉维(M Ravi)代表辩护。拉维曾指出,他们“将质询,在刑事法典499条下“有关人士之声誉”,依据2017年上诉庭判例,只能诠释作为“自然人”(natural persons only”),那么,文章所指的“内阁”,就不能视为任何意义上的“个人”,也和新加坡宪法23和24条一致。” 宪法第23条阐述行政机构性质;24条则关乎内阁的组成。 迪哥达在去年12月12日,在刑事法典第499条文,以及第500条文下被提控。他被指控在2018年9月4日,电邮了含诽谤内阁成员内容的文章到《网络公民》。其中提及“高层腐败”(corruption at…

任职淡马锡理工八年”假专才“被踢爆 院方疏于核实?

包庇染艾滋男友,36岁医生吕德祥以自己的血液样本偷龙转凤,让男友申请在新加坡就业准证。吕德祥为此付出法律代价,被控唆使作弊和向公务员作虚假供证,于本周二被判两年监禁。 去年,吕德祥的32岁美籍男友费雷拉(Farrera-Brochez ),也因为诈欺、欺骗公务员、拥毒和文凭造假等23项罪行,已在去年被判28个月监禁。 费雷拉自2008年以来就在新加坡工作。这位“假冒专才”以造假文凭,成功瞒过人力资源部和淡马锡理工学院长达八年,直至两年前在其居所被搜出大麻、克他命等毒品。 费雷拉甚至获得淡马锡理工学院“赏识”,获准在院内开设儿童心理诊所提供咨询服务。 “假专才”自诩”天才神童“ ”假专才“费雷拉甚至在2010年,在接受媒体访问时自诩”天才神童“,声称自己在三岁时就能通晓希伯来、西班牙和英语。 他告诉记者”早年并不知自己天赋异禀“,声称其母亲特蕾莎金,是英国有名的儿童青少心理学、儿童神经学和天才科学和数学教育学者。他说,母亲在他年幼时在他身上测试”天才教育理论“,是妈妈较成功的白老鼠。 ”我人生中母亲的影响很大,没有他的指导我不会有今日的成功。“在13岁,他则入读普林斯顿大学。 被踢爆”知名学者母亲“纯属虚构 随着费雷拉在两年前因拥毒被捕,英国媒体《独立报》决定调查费雷拉身世背景,结果在去年三月的报导,踢爆费雷拉所谓的学者母亲特蕾莎金,根本就不存在。 当时,英媒《独立报》报导:英国精神学会向该报指出,在所有注册会员中查无此人。虽找到名为特蕾莎金的妇女,但其身为心理学家的丈夫向媒体澄清,费雷拉不是他们的儿子,而妻子也并不精于所谓儿童心理学等领域。 费雷拉最终承认所谓”知名学者“的母亲根本是虚构的。…