Workers’ Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh took to his Facebook on Sunday (21 June) to reply a question raised by Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam, who had asked whose side is Mr Singh on in regards to his support towards local playwright Alfian Sa’at.

“When it comes to Singapore’s sovereignty, there can be no doubt where the WP has stood and will continue to stand. We stand with Singapore,” Mr Singh wrote.

In fact, he went on to quote a statement made by the Law Minister himself in a public forum last year. Mr Shanmugam said, “… I’m glad to tell you, at least based on my experience so far, there has been no gap, no party politics has supervened or interfered with our pursuit of foreign policy. This is a blessing … certainly with the current Opposition, they have played their part, and we have taken them into confidence. So it makes my job so much easier.”

Based on this, Mr Singh asserted that there is no doubt that his Party’s support is always for Singapore.

This latest exchange between the politicians started after People’s Action Party (PAP) Member of Parliament (MP) Tan Wu Meng denounced Mr Singh’s support towards Mr Alfian on Friday (19 June).

Dr Tan, who is the MP for Jurong Group Representation Constituency (GRC), said that Mr Alfian is not a “loving critic” of Singapore and that Mr Singh should read all his previous writings “carefully” before praising the playwright.

In the article, Dr Tan highlighted a number of Mr Alfian previous remarks on Facebook, some going back as far as 2011, where the poet penned his take on Malaysia and other issues. He claimed that the poet’s posts showed his disdain for Singapore.

Commenting on his use of the term “loving critic” in Parliament earlier this month, Mr Singh on Sunday noted that veteran diplomat Tommy Koh had “originally coined” the phrase for Mr Alfian “and Singaporeans like him”.

“Prof Koh, a Singaporean diplomat of international stature who built his reputation by tactfully protecting Singapore’s foreign interests over many decades, needs no introduction. I found Prof Koh’s use of the term ‘loving critic’ to describe Singaporeans like Mr Alfian Sa’at apt. Why?

“I do not specifically track what our playwrights say about Malaysia. But I have always appreciated the perspective of theatre practitioners in Singapore, regardless of their race or choice of language medium, on subjects considered taboo or sensitive by mainstream standards.

“Such reflections, which are commonly critical and provocative, give rise to a thinking population,” said Mr Singh in his post.

As such, the WP chief noted that Mr Alfian should not be “admonished” in Parliament due to some of his previous works. However, if a Singaporean consistently shows that he or she “rejects Singapore or our Constitution or runs Singapore down with a political agenda overseas”, then Mr Singh stated that both him and his party will not support such conduct.

Mr Shanmugam responds

Following Mr Singh’s reply, Mr Shanmugam took to his Facebook this morning (22 June) to pen a reply.

The Law Minister expressed that he is glad that Mr Singh said that “the WP will continue to stand squarely with the government when it comes to foreign relations”.

He added that this is the same stance that former WP leader Mr Low Thia Kiang took.

However, Mr Shanmugam asserted that he still wants to know if Mr Singh “still believes that Mr Alfian Sa’at’s views on Malaysia and Singapore merit his support”.

“He admits now that he hadn’t examined these statements before declaring Mr Sa’at a ‘loving critic’ and admonishing the government for not heeding Mr Sa’at’s wisdom. He need not rush to examine those statements, (set out in Dr Tan’s post), but I hope to hear his views on them in good time,” he wrote in his post.

Mr Shanmugam added, “And let me make clear- this is not about artistic freedom, or license, those are not being questioned. This is specifically about Mr Singh asking the Government to listen to a specific individual.”

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

National Solidarity Party’s Statement Regarding By-Election In Hougang

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: After careful deliberation, the National Solidarity Party has decided…

电召车服务Grab被指垄断市场 被马国竞争委会罚2100万新元

知名电召车服务Grab日前被马国竞争委会盯上,被指滥用其在市场的龙头地位垄断市场,经调查判定罚款重金8677万令吉(约2100万新元)。 Grab目前是东南亚内最大的电召车服务,去年收购了其竞争对手优步(Uber)在东南亚地区的业务后,更是奠定了东南亚最大的电召车服务的位置。由于占据极大的市场,疑似垄断了电召车服务市场,因此各国也开始盯紧及审查Grab。 马来西亚竞争委员会首席执行员依斯干达依斯迈指出,自从Grab和优步(Uber)在2018年3月杪合并后,该委员会接获许多针对Grab的投诉,经过调查发现,Grab违反马来西亚《2010年竞争法令》第10条文,因此建议罚款该公司8677万2943令吉76仙(约2100万新元)。 “这些限制条规已影响相关市场竞争,通过多边平台,创造各种障碍,打压现有和未来的电子召车商竞争者的发展“,他表示。 此外,竞争委会也表示,Grab仍能为自己反驳,期限为30天,如果未能依照指示即使纠正相关问题,可能会处以每日罚款1万5000令吉。Grab也会有30天的时间对竞争委会作出回应。 Grab坚称无违反法令,对判决感震惊 对此,Grab则表示自己对判决感到震惊,并坚称该公司的作法并没有违反2010年竞争法令。 马国Grab公司发言人表示,对于竞争委员会做出的建议裁定,感到十分惊讶。 “我们坚持立场,我们完全遵守2010年竞争法令。” 去年,Grab与优步合并时,我国也曾针对此事提出高达950万新元的重罚。

欺骗网站再放大招 捏造尚达曼言论招揽比特币投资

诈骗网站企图招揽民众投资比特币,胆大包天地捏造国务资政兼社会政策统筹部长尚达曼的言论,还配上《海峡时报》报导。 新加坡金融管理局周二(12月3日)发出文告,指一诈骗网站试图假扮《海峡时报》的新闻报道,指也是金管局主席的尚达曼在接受传媒电视节目《狮城有约》主持人林有懿采访时,拿出手机展示他透过“赚大钱计划”赚取高额利润,而林有懿则露出了难以置信的表情。 根据该网站的屏幕截图显示,尚达曼被冒用以吸引民众参与比特币交易平台“Bitcoin Circuit”,并指有关“新投资”能让新加坡数百人变得非常富有。 “该网站试图利用刊登类似高度虚假且具误导性的信息,让民众利用信用卡或银行账户进行投资,从中骗取民众资料。而截屏中尚达曼的陈述是完全错误的。” 当局指出,其实并非首次出现部长被盗用名义,以招揽民众投资比特币。 除了尚达曼部长,我国政要还有总统哈莉玛、总理李显龙、副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰、人力部长兼内政部第二部长杨莉明,还有其他知名人物的名字和照片都被盗用过。 当局呼吁民众提高警惕,勿随意分享个人财务资料获个人信息。 “若民众怀疑有任何涉及欺诈或非法活动的投资,也可以向警方报案。”