Six members of the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) and a reporter from The Straits Times (ST) had their details taken down by a safe distancing officer during their walkabout at Block 358 Bukit Batok West Street 31 on Sunday (21 June).

Gigene Wong is one of the six PSP members, who was one the first slate of candidates introduced by the Party on Thursday (18 June).

According to the ST’s report, the National Environment Agency (NEA) officer claimed that a member of the public complained the group assembled at a coffee shop near the area, adding that the group has exceeded the limitation of five people per group.

The six PSP members and the reporter were alleged of breaching the safe distancing measures and will be fined by the authorities.

Nevertheless, the NEA officers reassured that they can appeal against the fine.

The PSP members, however, denied the allegation. It noted that the group sat separately and it has never assembled with more than five people at once.

Meanwhile, three other members of the media – who was not specified from which news outlet – did not have their details taken by the officers.

TOC in its earlier coverage of PSP’s walkabout at Chua Chu Kang GRC noticed that while the groups of the political party is kept to five by its own social distancing duty officer. The various media personnel covering the walkabout will inevitably increase the groups’ size beyond five — something which is outside of the party’s control.

The Elections Department (ELD) released its campaign guidelines for the next GE on 18 June, stating that actions in accordance with the prevailing safe distancing and safe management guidelines will be taken to political parties or candidates who have been found flouting the safe distancing measures.

“This is no different than for any member of the general public,” the ELD asserted.

Subscribe
Notify of
22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Why they want to be the next Elected President

The Prime Minister has issued the writ for the upcoming Presidential Election.…

夹心一代情况堪忧 国人大多未做好退休准备

华侨银行在上周公布的金融健康指数调查显示,大多数在职的成年国人在经济方面,还未做好退休准备。 有关研究对年龄介于21岁到65岁的2000名我国在职成年人展开调查,询问他们的财务状况。 引人注意的是,需要同时照顾年迈父母和自己孩子的夹心一代中,有一半的人士仍然努力应对着生活负担,显示了他们的财务状况令人担忧。 研究发现,平均有26巴仙受访者会工资储蓄起来,其中有82巴仙受访者有买保险。大约三分之一的人不投资,并认为投资是一种赌博,而将近一半的人没有包括租金、股息、利息收入、年金支付等被动收入。 研究指出,大部分人都没有为退休做好充分准备,几乎四分之三受访者未根据退休计划行事。约65巴仙的受访者表示,他们没有储存足够的钱,来维持退休后的生活。 尤其是夹心一代,与其他人相比,他们在经济上面对更多难处,其中有半数一力承担父母和孩子的生活负担而感到里布重新。面对此困境的人中,有63巴仙的人士担心他们只能维持基本的生活需求。 理想退休龄随岁数增长上调 有趣的是,受访者的理想退休年龄,会随着年龄增长而上调。在20岁的年龄组里,他们的理想退休年龄是56岁,而55岁及以上年龄层的人士则希望在67岁退休。 鉴于我国人口的平均预期寿命增加,政府正在准备将退休年龄和重新雇佣年龄上调至62岁和67岁。 我国政府目前似乎对于承担国家退休金政策不甚满意,并希望每个人能抚养自己年迈的父母。 事实上,他们甚至颁布了一项法律,允许父母起诉没有给予抚养费的子女。根据《赡养父母法令》,若老年父母无法自给自足,他们可以合法地向孩子要求抚养费。在申请赡养费中,父母可以将所有孩子都列为赡养费提供者。 在《赡养父母法令》下,政府成立了赡养父母仲裁庭(Tribunal…

Kenneth Jeyaretnam calls for POFMA to be issued to Lee Hsien Loong over falsehoods

Kenneth Jeyaretnam from the Reform Party (RP) has called upon the Elections…

忆述大学时期表达诉求经历 前官委议员戴尚志劝青年“当负责任的异议者”

上月中旬,因耶鲁—国大学院临时取消一门名为《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程,引起本地学术界乃至社会群众热议。此前教育部长王乙康在国会称,教育部不能容许学府展开“有议程的活动”。 他引述亚菲言在本月5日(周六)的贴文,指后者提到复兴“新加坡学生运动”,特别是在“政治自觉化”等领域。 “负责有关课程的个人可以保有对新加坡的看法,甚至公开在社交媒体,但我们是否应让这种政治异议存在于我们的教育中?” 不过,巡回大使许通美教授非议王乙康的说法,认为后者不应妖魔化亚菲言,并指他是新加坡的“友爱批评者”。 对于异议课程被腰斩风波,前官委议员、法律学者戴尚志博士亦在日前于脸书分享其个人观点。 目前仍在新加坡智囊机构国际事务研究所担任主席的戴尚志,认为近期的论述主要分为三点: 有关教授和教育争议性课题的范畴 有关写作人和批判类文艺的自由 青年人与异议 从1984年反对政府优生政策谈起 戴尚志回溯35年前(1984年),新加坡政府推出争议性的“优生”政策“毕业妈妈政策”(Graduate Mother…