People’s Action Party (PAP) MP Tan Wu Meng wrote an article condemning Workers’ Party chief Pritam Singh for his support toward local playwright Alfian Sa’at.

Dr Tan, who is the MP for Jurong Group Representation Constituency (GRC), said that Mr Alfian is not a “loving critic” of Singapore and that Mr Singh should read all his previous writings “carefully” before praising the playwright.

The article, which was published on the PAP website on Friday (19 June), highlighted a part of Mr Singh’s speech in Parliament on 5 June.

Mr Singh said, “We should count ourselves fortunate that we have citizens who are the loving critics amongst us, some of whom have been questioned in this very House in this term of government. Members would recall one citizen’s poems were nit-picked with a view to cast wholly negative aspersions on his character, even though that individual was not present in the House to defend himself.”

Although Mr Singh did not name anyone in his speech, but Dr Tan said that “it is clear that he was referring to Alfian Sa’at”.

“There are many Singaporeans who criticise Singapore out of patriotism and genuine care, including opposition leaders like Mr Chiam See Tong and Mr Low Thia Khiang. But Alfian Sa’at is no ‘loving critic’,” the PAP politician said.

In Dr Tan’s opinion piece, he highlighted a number of Mr Alfian previous remarks made on Facebook, some going back as far as 2011, which he said clearly illustrated the poet’s disdain for Singapore.

The first one he mentioned was about the water issues between Singapore and Malaysia in 2018, when Dr Mahathir Mohamed was Malaysia’s Prime Minister.

“For nearly a decade, Alfian has consistently praised Malaysia to illustrate his disdain for Singapore. In 2018, Malaysia, (when Dr Mahathir was PM) was sending vessels into our waters. There were serious issues between the two countries on airspace as well. Singaporeans rallied together. Mr Low Thia Kiang spoke in Parliament, as a patriot would,” the PAP MP said.

He added, “And Alfian? He mocked the approach taken by Singapore as “jingoism” (even as Malaysian government vessels were anchored in our waters) and that it meant to scare its own people of “barbarians” up north when there are none anymore, and that the Malaysians may in fact be Singapore’s solution.”

If that’s not all, Dr Tan, who is also the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Foreign Affairs, as well as Trade and Industry, pointed out another instance in 2013 where the playwright penned his support toward Dr Mahathir, and “wished Singapore can be more like Malaysia”.

“Alfian’s view is that Dr Mahathir’s style of democracy, and Malaysian style governance, should be brought to Singapore. Contrast this with what Alfian wrote about Mr Lee Kuan Yew, on the eve of our 2012 National Day,” Dr Tan wrote.

He continued, “And when Mr Lee Kuan Yew died, Alfian attacked Mr Lee’s legacy and contributions to Singapore, barely 2 days later.”

The PAP MP also stated that the poet likes the Malaysian Bumiputera policies, and that he said the “Singaporean Chinese are being selfish, in not wanting merger with Malaysia”.

He also went on to say that Mr Alfian’s loyalty lies in Malaysia, and that the playwright even said in an interview with TODAY that he “would love to become a Malaysian”.

“This man grew up in Singapore. Singapore gave him his education and he earns a living here. An education and a living that is denied to many minorities in the region. And he constantly runs down Singapore, and says he would love to become a Malaysian, and that there is nothing wrong in accepting the Bumiputera policies here. And takes Malaysia’s side, when there are tensions between Malaysia and Singapore,” Dr Tan explained.

As such, the PAP MP suggested Mr Singh to read all the playwright’s remarks carefully before calling him a ‘loving critic’ of the country.

“Mr Singh may not have read all these things that Alfian has said. I suggest he read them carefully, and then tell us if he still thinks Alfian is a ‘loving critic’ of Singapore.

“If he does, perhaps Mr Singh himself a ‘loving critic’ of Singapore too?” he asked.

Mr Singh responds

Sharing Dr Tan’s article on Facebook, Mr Singh simply replied: “A loving critic. A son of Singapore. Not perfect. As imperfect as you and me Dr Tan, maybe more, maybe less”.

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

ESM Goh reveals Ho Ching didn’t say no when first approached to join politics

Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong’s authorised biography, titled ‘Tall Order: The…

马哈迪警告 不排除对付在国外引起烟霾马国公司

马来西亚首相马哈迪警告,那些在国外引发烟霾的大马公司须负上责任,包括采取行动扑灭林火,否则马国政府不排除将立法对付他们。 马哈迪在昨日的新闻发布会上透露,若发现这些公司不愿采取行动,可能会寻求在国会通过法律,要他们负起责任。 他认为,即使这些马国公司资产在外国,但也应对自己的产业着火负责。 上周五,印尼环保与林业部长茜蒂努尔峇雅,透露该国已封锁超过30个被指涉及烧芭的种植公司,包括森那美种植集团的子公司Sime Indo Agro、IOI集团的子公司Sukses Karya Sawit 、嘉隆发展集团的子公司Rafi Kamajaya Abadi,以及吉隆坡甲洞的子公司Adei Plantation…

林鼎:为何行动党仍畏惧生活工资?

人民之声党领袖林鼎,质问人民行动党政府为何迄今仍害怕落实生活工资,致使一些工友在全球生活成本最高的国家,却领取难以负担基本生活水准的收入过活。 本月4日,国防部兼人力部高级政务部长扎吉哈,曾声言将探讨餐饮业是否能采纳渐进式薪金模式(PWM)。 林鼎揶揄前者仍在用“行动党式模式”思考,声称餐饮价格可能因此提高;但行动党却忽略了本地“食利者”(rentier,指靠投资收益过活)社会现象。林鼎指出,一些商家也反映,正是租金成本在遏制本土企业的成长。 林鼎偕同该党成员到牛车水向民众拜早年,分发碰柑给民众。他也预祝国人新年快乐,万事如意。 他指出,去年一整年遭受疫情冲击,但似乎来到今年也无法期许生活能尽快恢复常态,全球各地如欧美因疫情仍在封境管制。 当前局势更需要让小商家、普通老百姓度过难关。至于副总理兼财长王瑞杰,早前也宣称在即将到来的预算案将扶助各界,也认为行业需要转型。 “过去30年他们也在说经济转型,却不曾发生,新加坡甚至仍未有生活薪资!” 生活工资指的是足以维持基本生活所需的收入。两年前,李光耀公共政策学院曾发表一项研究报告,显示65岁及以上单身者,每月生活消费至少需1千379元。 林鼎质问:“那还是乐龄人士的,那么年轻人怎么办?”他抨击,行动党政府的渐进式薪金制一点也不“进步”,“如果一些民众收入仍少于1千200元,你不能自称是第一世界国家。” 本地德士司机“全球学历最高”? 他也重申外籍专才议题,认为政府不应只是关注招揽外籍专才,应该让有能力国人把握专业领域工作机会,而不是面对裁员问题、变成德士或私召车司机。他揶揄,新加坡的德士司机俨然是“全球最有学问、学历最高的德士司机。” 尽管王瑞杰提及创新,但林鼎也直言,那么政府就更应该焦点放在栽培中小企业,他预见“未来这几年,更多国人会仰赖中小或微型企业求生存”。…

Stalemate between authorities and residents over planned Chinese temple and columbarium

Dialogue session came to a stalemate between authorities and the future residents…