Bloomberg reported yesterday that many rich Hong Kongers are beginning to reduce their Hong Kong exposure by transferring their money out of Hong Kong (‘Hong Kong’s Rich Are Preparing for a Worst-Case Scenario‘, 14 Jun).

Private bankers say their clients accelerated contingency planning efforts after China announced last month it would impose controversial national security laws on Hong Kong.

“What we’re basically seeing is a bit like a slow-moving train wreck,” said Richard Harris, chief executive of Port Shelter Investment Management in Hong Kong. “People who haven’t moved their money out may be tempted to think: ‘Well, maybe I should be moving my money out.’ That process is likely to continue.”

Hong Kong’s wealthiest billionaires have publicly endorsed the legislation and expressed confidence in Hong Kong’s future but privately, many Hong Kong entrepreneurs and high-earning professionals are pessimistic.

One Hong Kong businessman, who would only gave his name as Cheng, told Bloomberg that he has already moved US$10 million to Singapore. He added that he plans to transfer more.

He has also secured his permanent resident status in Singapore this year and has been selling his Hong Kong properties. He has no concrete plans to emigrate yet, but is considering his options. He and his family have passports from the U.S., Canada, Australia and France.

Cheng, who was born in Hong Kong, said he worries about China’s tightening grip on the city and the prospect for more unrest.

Kerry Goh, CEO of Kamet Capital based in Singapore, said his clients have shifted from asking generic questions about moving out of Hong Kong to making detailed inquiries about everything from schools to visas and bank accounts. Goh’s company specialises in managing the assets of Asian-based high net worth families.

“What’s happened in Hong Kong has really sped up the timing of 2047,” Goh said, referring to the expiration date of China’s 50-year pledge to preserve Hong Kong’s autonomy. “As Hong Kong’s troubles shoot up, the benefits of Singapore have become more self-explanatory.”

Dennis, a 34-year-old executive, said his family and many of their friends have started moving cash out of Hong Kong. He’s looking to buy more properties in the U.K. “I could buy a much bigger flat in London, so why not?” he said. “I’m just trying to protect my money against any uncertainty.”

Govt grants Chinese fugitive PR to live in Singapore

For rich foreigners to obtain PR in Singapore, they would have to invest at least S$2.5 million in Singapore under the Global Investor Programme (GIP) run by EDB.

On its website, EDB said, “The Global Investor Programme (GIP) accords Singapore Permanent Resident status (PR) to eligible global investors who intend to drive their businesses and investment growth from Singapore. You will need to have a substantial business track record and successful entrepreneurial background to qualify.”

However, few years ago, an interesting case surfaced when China’s second most wanted fugitive involved in corruption was found living in Singapore with PR status.

Li Huabo was a Chinese government official from Poyang county in Jiangxi province. He embezzled 94 million yuan (US$14 million) of state’s fund before escaping to Singapore in 2011. Before fleeing, he funneled 29 million yuan (US$5.2 million) through Singapore banks.

He even managed to become a PR and lived in Singapore for awhile before he was found out by Chinese authorities that he was hiding here. He made it to the list of China’s ‘100 most wanted’ economic fugitives.

In May 2015, Li was repatriated back to China where he was sentenced to life imprisonment for corruption.

Singapore’s Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) later revoked his and his family members’ PR status.

It’s not known how EDB deemed that Li had a “substantial business track record and successful entrepreneurial background” in order to qualify for GIP.

Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】5月11日新增486确诊

根据卫生部文告,截至本月11日中午12时,本地新增486例冠状病毒19确诊。本地累计总病例达2万3822例。 新增确诊病例大多为住宿舍的工作准证持有者,另有两名新加坡公民和永久居民确诊。 当局仍在收集新增病例详情,并将在晚些时候公布细节。

“我能给你些建议吗!” 纳吉遭妻训斥成马国网络潮语

“我能给你些建议吗!”,相信大马人近日非常耳熟能详,甚至在推特一度成为马国潮语。 近日,马国反贪会主席拉蒂法发布的录音一段前首相纳吉与妻子罗斯玛在2016年的通话录音,对话中罗斯玛疑不满纳吉处理SRC案的方式而语气欠佳。 从录音中可清楚听见,罗斯玛抱怨纳吉处事不当,害她沦为过街老鼠。 当时罗斯玛大声指责,“我可以给你一些建议吗!”(原话:Can I advise you something?) 而纳吉则听起来语气焦虑地回答,“是是是,什么事?” 罗斯玛便开始抱怨反贪会主席阿布卡欣和前首相阿都拉合照和其谈话。纳吉回应说了解问题。 录音当公开后,“我可以给你一些建议吗!”一词立即成为马国网络用语,许多网友立即拿来调侃并转发。网友也发挥创意,将潮语运发挥得淋漓尽致,甚至为他配图解说,业者纷纷跟风将潮语转发并宣传自家商品。 罗斯玛也在个人推特上公开斥责执政党应该将更多关注国家经济而不是她,但似乎也阻止不了网友的跟风潮。…

博客鄞义林为诽谤和公众骚扰起诉出席法院

博客,鄞义林今早为他的两个不同的告状出席法院,分别是在高等法院诽谤起诉举行的审前会议和在国家法院出席有关芳林公园的诉讼案件。 新加坡总理, 李显龙在2014年5月份起诉鄞先生诽谤. 原因鄞先生写了一篇文章(“你的公积金款项去了哪里?城市丰收教会审讯的启示”),提到政府拿退休金和公积金用,进行投资,但是没有把利息还给新加坡人。在文章里,他将政府拿公积金使用和一个教堂资金的用法进行比较,说的是教堂牧师和他的两个同事开了两个机构,将钱转进去,让他们的妻子使用。 代表李总理的律师表示鄞先生的断言是没有根据的,而诋毁了李总理的名誉。 接着,鄞先生与其他五人被指在今年9月27日下午4至5时之间,在芳林公园和直落亚逸芳林公园联络所一带,与至少20个人共谋干扰基督教青年会举行的户外活动,对公众构成骚扰。他们涉嫌游行、大声叫喊、高喊标语和打鼓等。 以下是博客,鄞义林先生在前往高等法院和国家法院出席今天举行的审前会议发表的讲稿。   我现在正在要前往出席审前会议。 我必须在出席审前会议前最后的一分钟的前一天晚上更我 辩护的律师。 我正在前往出席今早9时在高等法院举行的审前会议。接着,在十点钟我将前往国家法院出席有关芳林公园的诉讼案件。…