Dr Lee Weiling has just posted on her Facebook page, saying that events since the posting on 14 Jun 2017, have only served to reinforce their view.

The Facebook post was also shared by her younger brother, Lee Hsien Yang (LHY) on his Facebook page.

For those who have forgotten the incident as with many forgetful Singaporeans, here is a quick refresher.

In the joint statement published on 14 June 2017, Dr Lee and Mr LHY alleged that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (PM Lee) had abused his power as Prime Minister and how the two are being threatened by the current government as a result of refusing to abide PM Lee’s desire to retain the Oxley road estate despite their father, late Lee Kuan Yew’s wish to demolish the house after his passing.

In that statement, the two wrote, “The values of Lee Kuan Yew are being eroded by his own son. Our father placed our country and his people first, not his personal popularity or private agendas. We are very sad that we have been pushed to this. We feel hugely uncomfortable and closely monitored in our own country. We do not trust Hsien Loong as a brother or as a leader. We have lost confidence in him.”

Read: Prime Minister Lee’s siblings denounce him in statement, state misuse of his position and influence over Singapore government

The post made by the two siblings created a huge political tremor across the island, which compelled their brother, LHL to call for a parliament session which was held over two days to “clear” his name in light of the allegations and growing public speculations.

However, other than statements made by politicians in the parliament to decry the allegations as wild fabrications, there was no clear evidence presented that rebutted the claims made by the two siblings and LHL.

Mr Low Thia Khiang, MP for the Aljunied GRC then said,

“First, I am of the view that the correct platform to settle the private dispute is the court. Individuals who make less serious allegations that undermine the reputation and authority of the PM and Cabinet ministers have been brought to task for libel. There’s no reason why this time it should be different because it comes from the Lee family.

And in fact the allegations are much more serious. Given the past track record, not doing so would risk the Government giving the impression that it is afraid of what the Lee siblings might say or reveal. These will taint the trust Singaporeans have placed on the Government and compromise the high standards that the Government prides itself on achieving and aspire to maintain.”

Despite the damaging allegations made, LHL has not sued his two siblings for defamation for reasons of not wanting to “further besmirch our parents’ names,”.  “At the end of the day, we are brothers and sister, and we are all our parents’ children.” said LHL during the 2017 parliament debate.

Following the session in Parliament where LHL cleared himself of any wrongdoings, his nephew, Li Shengwu was charged for contempt of court in late 2017 over a private Facebook post. He subsequently withdrew from the proceedings in Jan this year after AGC applied to strike out parts of his own defence affidavit “with the result that they will not be considered at the trial”.

In Jan 2019, LHY’s wife, Lee Suet Fern had a complaint filed against her by the Attorney General Chambers which was headed by LHL’s former private lawyer, Lucien Wong. The Disciplinary Tribunal then released a report which accuses her of her professional misconduct in the preparation and execution of the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s final will.

In Sept 2019, PM Lee sues TOC editor, Terry Xu over an article published in regards to his wife, “PM Lee’s wife, Ho Ching weirdly shares article on cutting ties with family members”. The trial is set to be heard on 30 Nov to 4 Dec later this year.

Subscribe
Notify of
40 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“是时候放手啦” 老报人吁政府放宽对本地媒体钳制

资深老报人巴吉尔(PN Balji)认为,政府是时候放手对媒体的钳制,也直言,即使新加坡自诩第一世界国家、第一世界社会,却没有与其第一世界身份相符的媒体。 本月13日,工人党青年团举办网络讲座会,探讨后冠病时代的新加坡,巴吉尔也是主讲人之一。 他也是英语媒体《新報》(The New Paper)与《今日报》前主编。他谈及政府在各种层次对本地媒体的钳制,这包括要想办报,就得申请准证,而且只为期一年,而且如果拒绝更新准证,政府也没有义务解释理由。 1970年代,在《报纸与印刷出版法令》下推行报章改制,各报须由公众持股重组成为上市公司,确保报章不由单一人士或公司所拥有。然而,巴吉尔也指出,“魔鬼藏在细节里”,政府引入股权结构,需出让三巴仙股份,而持股者可能会必须一切代价捍卫政府权益。 再者,控制不仅来自法律层面,有好些行动党政府前内阁部长,都当过报业控股董事会主席,包括林金山、前总统陈庆炎、纳丹等人。即便现任主席李文献也曾当过部长;报业控股总裁伍逸松,也是军伍出身,是武装部队第五任三军总长,中将军衔,2007年退伍后担任东方海皇集团主席暨总裁,2017年则接任报业控股总裁至今。 巴吉尔坦言,对媒体的操控是广泛的,甚至达到任命谁当董事会主席,“我不确定什么时候就连委任编辑也要干预。” “出格”的编采人付出惨重代价 巴吉尔忆述,曾有一次已故建国总理李光耀,向编辑们抱怨某一张照片,“当时他还是总理,他质问编辑们到底想怎样?想把他拉下台吗?因为这就是英国媒体对前英相威尔逊(Harol Wilson)所做的事。”…

Janadas Devan did not interfere in LKY Musical, says MCI

The Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) has claimed that it has…

提升就业入息补贴,真的不在再纳的权限范围?

前日,主管低薪工人事务的职总助理秘书长再纳,出席《海峡时报》举行的圆桌对话会,探讨在破坏式经济时代下,国内劳动阶级的薪资模式。 受邀出席的尚有巡回大使许通美教授、淡马锡控股主席林文兴、新加坡中小企业协会会长王崇健以及清洁公司Nimbus创办人之一汤信豪。 许通美在对话会上,捍卫最低薪资制,他指出目前政府推出的就业入息补贴(WIS)和渐进式薪资模式(PW)立意虽善,但是还不够完善,他们的补贴或给付并不多,仍不足以让劳工摆脱贫穷。 所以,他提出,如果政府把渐进式薪资模式作为落实最低薪资制的先行计划,有计划逐步落实在所有领域;或者政府愿意提升WIS的补贴给付,让劳工减轻负担,才能达到效果。 目前,渐进式薪资模式进落实在保安、园艺、清洁工和电梯维修领域,保障这四大领域劳工的基本薪资,未来薪资透过参与培训、绩效表现增长。 但吊诡的是,身为职总副秘书长、理应和劳工站在一起的再纳,对于许通美的建议,说了令人困惑的话:“这不在我的职权范围,教授。”(not within my pay grade, Prof.) 这句话的潜台词似乎是:“这是我老板考虑的事,我操哪门子心呢?”…

Bethany Church Singapore: Dog abuse case does not relate to the church or its activities

On 24 March, Singapore’s volunteer group for dogs’ welfare, Chained Dog Awareness…