Facebook user Channey Lim shared on Thursday (11 June) how a group of enforcement officers from the National Environment Agency (NEA) was being rude to clinic staff and used their authority to acquire confidential patient information.

Ms Lim was one of the patients at the clinic who witnessed an argument between the NEA officers and the clinic staff.

According to her, some enforcement officers entered the clinic and went on to probe patients with a “loud voice” if the patients have essential purposes to be there.

When the clinic staff pointed out that patient information is private and confidential, one of the officers claimed that NEA officers have the rights to obtain confidential patient information.

The clinic staff requested the officers to wait outside but they were “throwing around” their authority, demanding “some sort of statements” from the clinic staff.

“The clinic staffs were clueless as to what they were saying, and was told to Google it. Which then an EO [enforcement officer] called them out for ‘working blindly’. Followed by snark comments on how they are incompetent for not knowing ‘basics’,” Ms Lim wrote.

She described the whole situation as “unsightly”, adding that a “string of sarcastic remarks was thrown back and forth” between them.

Eventually, the clinic staff told the NEA officers that she would need to check with the management for the officers’ demand, but one of the officers replied, “I am from the NEA, I will tell you what to do! You don’t need to check with your boss.”

“Even when asked to wait for their boss to come out, this guy just would not let it go,” Ms Lim added.

She noted that one of the patients probably felt that the clinic staff were “being attacked” by the officers and decided to intervene. One of the officers, however, said that the patient is in no position to intervene, adding that he would “talk to him later”.

On that note, Ms Lim questioned whether it is normal for NEA enforcement officers to act in such a way to members of the public.

“Are NEA enforcing officers allowed to crack the whip during such situations? Is it a norm for them to speak so rudely and condescendingly in every clinic/practice they visit? Creating hoohas and loud commotions?” she asked.

Ms Lim remarked, “I personally feel, authority is not to be abused. Even as mere humans, no one should be spoken to like that.”

Update: Ms Lim shared that the EOs were from MOH.

Subscribe
Notify of
30 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

CPIB says can’t comment on Keppel O&M case to protect the integrity of investigations

Professor Sattar Bawany from the Disruptive Leadership Institute, wrote a letter to…

Suspected terrorists arrested in Batam for plan to attack Marina Bay

Six suspected terrorists were arrested at various location in Batam by Indonesia’s…

失智老妇失踪两日 幸得好心人协助寻获

后港一带发生失智症老妇失踪,两日后,所幸在好心人的协助下,于昨日(15日)被寻获。 据警方发出的文告,84岁老妇Ho Ng Lui于周日(13日)早上10点半左右失踪,最终位置位于后港32街376B座组屋。随后,网友也在脸书上呼吁公众协寻,并描述老妇的特征:仅说广东话,身上没有携带任何证件。 老妇最终被寻获,其家属后来接受《8视界》采访称,老妇在失踪后跌倒,被一名好心人士发现立即联系医院,最后将老妇送入盛港综合医院,而家人亦接到医院来电赶去,目前情况良好。 失智症到底是什么? 失智症是一种慢性或进行性综合症,通常是认知功能(即处理思想的能力)出现比正常年老过程更严重的衰退。它会影响记忆、思考、定向、理解、计算、学习、语言和判断能力,但不会影响意识。那它究竟在我国是否成为普遍现象? 根据心理健康学院(IMH)的调查指出,10个年过60岁的人,可能就有一个患失智症,而且2018年间预计已高达8万2000人患有失智症,而且其数字可能还会每年随之增长。 失智症患者不仅仅是记性不好如此简单,亦可能会使患者开始出现记忆力减退、判断及抽象思考以及其他脑高度机能均呈失常,甚至于行为及性格亦有变化。 其中,失智症最普遍的现象为阿兹海默症,俗称老人痴呆症,其病因不得而知,而且并无任何已知的治疗方法能够治愈。在无法治愈的情况下,可想而知患有失智症的患者一直都生活在绝望和无助中。 新加坡管理大学与新加坡阿兹海默症协会曾协同进行相关失智症研究。研究发现,四名失智症患者中,有高达三名的患者感到排斥与孤独。此外,研究亦发现,每两名失智症患者中,就有一名无法像其他人坦白自己的病情,而且近六成的失智症患者认为因为病情关系,他们被视为缺乏竞争力。 患者经常面临无助与孤独…

国会通过终身护保和长期护理法案 明年起30-40岁国人强制加入终身护保

国会在昨日三读通过《终身护保和长期护理法案》,协助重度残障者应付长期护理开销。 明年起,年龄介于30-40岁的首批国人,将强制加入终身护保计划(CareShield Life);1979年或之前出生的国人,可在2021年中之后,选择是否参与。 卫生部长颜金勇声称,社会可通过终身护保和乐龄健保(ElderShield)来分担风险,资助长期护理成本是大家共同的责任。 在终身护保计划下,只要受保人在日常活动中的六项(冲凉、进食、走动、移动、更衣和如厕),有三项无法自理,每月可获得一笔现金应付长期护理开销直至康复或离世。 终身护保将交由公积金局和护联中心管理;此外,政府也将在2021年,从三家私人保险业者手中接管130万份乐龄健保保单。 事实上,当政府推出终身护保计划,已有不少团体和民间,都呼吁能降低重度伤残资格,即把无法自理日常活动从三项降至两项。 2017年仅6.6巴仙长者重度伤残 在去年连氏基金长期护理研究报告中,就提及在2017年,只有6.6巴仙长者—约3万4千人面临严重伤残情况。这意味着,有大部分人都被排除在符合申请赔付的范围外。 对此,报告建议可改为根据有多少项日常起居无法自理,分等级给与相对的赔付,以此把保障范围也扩大至一些身患一定程度残障的国人。 在昨日的国会辩论中,亦有不少议员提出上述疑问。不过卫生部仍认为,降低索赔条件,或增加赔付额,也会导致受保国人每月需支付更高的保费。 此前,由于终身护保对女性征收更高保费,也引起民间热议,但在去年卫生部高级政务部长许连碹说,让女性缴付更高的终身护保保费是困难的决定,但政府必须这么做,确保计划可以持续。…