Facebook user Channey Lim shared on Thursday (11 June) how a group of enforcement officers from the National Environment Agency (NEA) was being rude to clinic staff and used their authority to acquire confidential patient information.

Ms Lim was one of the patients at the clinic who witnessed an argument between the NEA officers and the clinic staff.

According to her, some enforcement officers entered the clinic and went on to probe patients with a “loud voice” if the patients have essential purposes to be there.

When the clinic staff pointed out that patient information is private and confidential, one of the officers claimed that NEA officers have the rights to obtain confidential patient information.

The clinic staff requested the officers to wait outside but they were “throwing around” their authority, demanding “some sort of statements” from the clinic staff.

“The clinic staffs were clueless as to what they were saying, and was told to Google it. Which then an EO [enforcement officer] called them out for ‘working blindly’. Followed by snark comments on how they are incompetent for not knowing ‘basics’,” Ms Lim wrote.

She described the whole situation as “unsightly”, adding that a “string of sarcastic remarks was thrown back and forth” between them.

Eventually, the clinic staff told the NEA officers that she would need to check with the management for the officers’ demand, but one of the officers replied, “I am from the NEA, I will tell you what to do! You don’t need to check with your boss.”

“Even when asked to wait for their boss to come out, this guy just would not let it go,” Ms Lim added.

She noted that one of the patients probably felt that the clinic staff were “being attacked” by the officers and decided to intervene. One of the officers, however, said that the patient is in no position to intervene, adding that he would “talk to him later”.

On that note, Ms Lim questioned whether it is normal for NEA enforcement officers to act in such a way to members of the public.

“Are NEA enforcing officers allowed to crack the whip during such situations? Is it a norm for them to speak so rudely and condescendingly in every clinic/practice they visit? Creating hoohas and loud commotions?” she asked.

Ms Lim remarked, “I personally feel, authority is not to be abused. Even as mere humans, no one should be spoken to like that.”

Update: Ms Lim shared that the EOs were from MOH.

Subscribe
Notify of
30 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Mr Murali Pillai provides success stories for Community Job Placement Scheme

Wishing Bukit Batok residents and bus captains a happy May Day, PAP…

哈佛赞我国对武汉冠病检测系统“几近完美”

武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)在我国爆发至今已有77宗确诊病例,而我国的检测系统获得了美国哈佛大学赞扬,几乎“接近完美的黄金水准”。 哈佛大学研究员指出,我国的检测能力几乎完美,因为截止本月4日,我国已经成功检测出18起病例。 他们表示,若其他国家拥有同样的检测能力,估计全球可检测到的输入型病例会是目前的将近三倍。 研究员指出,我国在监测疾病和追踪接触者方面的能力和表现,一直以来都非常强。 当局表示,由于全球检测输入型病例的能力甚至没有我国的一半,因此估计病毒持续传播的潜在风险依然存在。

2016年曾有本地雇主诬陷女佣偷窃 遭判监七周

樟宜机场集团主席前廖文良,指控印尼籍女佣偷窃,惟案件最终获平反,五项控状都获撤销。 案件引起社会关注,高庭法官陈成安在判词中提及,廖文良一家举报女佣偷窃,背后动机有疑点,存在“不当意图”。对于高庭判决也促使总检察署表示,将再研究廖举报女佣的行为和动机,再决定是否采取进一步行动。 由于不希望女佣案判决影响公司,廖文良已在昨晚(10日)宣布卸下樟宜机场集团主席等职务。他在声明中解释,当初报警是因为“若对方有犯罪嫌疑,报警让有关当局调查,是在尽公民义务。”   他也指过程中积极配合调查, 如今总检察署将检讨此案,他也表示和家人仍会给予配合。 回溯2016年,曾有一名幼教老师,因诬陷家庭女佣投了她的金饰,结果被检控,最终判坐牢七周。 这名雇主名为德赛(Desai Asti Amit ),不满她家中印度籍女佣金梅(Kinmei)的表现,但后者曾两度要求离职都不被允许。 而一次金梅陪同雇主儿子到游乐场玩,德赛变乘机把金饰和一个金属的祭祀杯,偷偷塞进金梅的行李箱中,有意栽赃嫁祸。隔日,金梅逃离雇主前往福利机构。当时她也只戴了钱包、手机和护照,行李箱还留在雇主家中。…

男子带脚车乘地铁还对乘客爆粗 SMRT报警

男子把脚踏车带进地铁车厢,还高挂在扶手栏杆上,态度嚣张对其他乘客爆粗! 网民Nurul Hanisha昨日在社交媒体脸书分享短片,上述男子戴着紫色帽子、身穿灰色T恤,不仅无视其他乘客把脚车悬挂扶手栏杆,还爆粗口骂其他乘客。 许多网友谴责这名男子行为举止像流氓,好像整个车厢都是他的,脚车爱怎么摆都不用顾及其他乘客的便利。网友也质问男子是如何成功进站,难道地铁公司没有阻止? 地铁公司SMRT则在脸书回复词时,指出事件发生在本月15日傍晚7时许。当时兀兰地铁站的职员已试图阻止这名男子进站,他携带着非折叠式脚踏车。 “这名男乘客不肯合作,硬硬要进站,登上北向的列车。随后在裕廊东站转乘西行列车,在傍晚7点50分离开先驱地铁站。” SMRT公司声称已确认乘客身份并报警,也强调为了其他乘客的安全和舒适着想,提醒民众若携带折叠式脚踏车或个人代步工具时上地铁和巴士,需遵守规则。 但似乎网民仍质疑,何以地铁保安无法阻止男子进站,或是未立即报警请警员到场处理。