Facebook user Channey Lim shared on Thursday (11 June) how a group of enforcement officers from the National Environment Agency (NEA) was being rude to clinic staff and used their authority to acquire confidential patient information.

Ms Lim was one of the patients at the clinic who witnessed an argument between the NEA officers and the clinic staff.

According to her, some enforcement officers entered the clinic and went on to probe patients with a “loud voice” if the patients have essential purposes to be there.

When the clinic staff pointed out that patient information is private and confidential, one of the officers claimed that NEA officers have the rights to obtain confidential patient information.

The clinic staff requested the officers to wait outside but they were “throwing around” their authority, demanding “some sort of statements” from the clinic staff.

“The clinic staffs were clueless as to what they were saying, and was told to Google it. Which then an EO [enforcement officer] called them out for ‘working blindly’. Followed by snark comments on how they are incompetent for not knowing ‘basics’,” Ms Lim wrote.

She described the whole situation as “unsightly”, adding that a “string of sarcastic remarks was thrown back and forth” between them.

Eventually, the clinic staff told the NEA officers that she would need to check with the management for the officers’ demand, but one of the officers replied, “I am from the NEA, I will tell you what to do! You don’t need to check with your boss.”

“Even when asked to wait for their boss to come out, this guy just would not let it go,” Ms Lim added.

She noted that one of the patients probably felt that the clinic staff were “being attacked” by the officers and decided to intervene. One of the officers, however, said that the patient is in no position to intervene, adding that he would “talk to him later”.

On that note, Ms Lim questioned whether it is normal for NEA enforcement officers to act in such a way to members of the public.

“Are NEA enforcing officers allowed to crack the whip during such situations? Is it a norm for them to speak so rudely and condescendingly in every clinic/practice they visit? Creating hoohas and loud commotions?” she asked.

Ms Lim remarked, “I personally feel, authority is not to be abused. Even as mere humans, no one should be spoken to like that.”

Update: Ms Lim shared that the EOs were from MOH.

Subscribe
Notify of
30 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

若2030年人口少过690万 为何仍执迷开发树林建组屋?

回溯去年大选,人民行动党政府驳斥民主党,强调政府没有所谓“一千万人口”的规划目标;去年10月,总理公署部长英兰妮也在国会宣称,政府在2018年曾预测,截至2030年,新加坡的总人口数可能会低于690万人。 英兰妮当时也表示,2019年新加坡民生育率达到1.14,与2018年相同。 武吉巴督山坡树林保育发起人Jimmy Tan,对此不禁困惑,假设直到2030年,新加坡总人口可能大大低于690万人,为何政府仍执迷大事开发树林,建造更多组屋住房呢? Jimmy Tan今日(12日)在脸书上持续公开为武吉巴督山坡丛林发声,重申武吉巴督山坡丛林的重要性,以及质问砍伐树林建造住房的目的。 他表示,自去年8月发动联署开始,已获得近1万支持,除了武吉巴督的居民外,其实乌鲁班丹、榜鹅、白沙林一带的居民,也面对附近树林或自然生态栖息地逐渐减少的隐忧。 “这些居民之所以选择在当地定居,是因为可以和大自然亲近、空气清新,偶尔能够看见野生动物,以及享受宁静的片刻。当你看见如此幸福的保护区和自然栖息地,被他们以开发房产地的名义夺走,真的感到很悲伤。” 他续指,与其破坏成熟的次生林(secondary forest),不如将预购组屋(BTO)在一些开发建筑地,或棕地(废弃工业或商业用地)上建造会或许会更好。 另一方面,他也质疑尤其在生育率低的时代,为何仍需要不停建造组屋,甚至不惜破坏已不多的树林,就是为了建造更多住房空间。 “有报道指出,鉴于最近的趋势,截至2030年,我国的总人口可能大大低于690万,为何仍需破坏武吉巴督部分森林,以建造更多住房空间。”…

Why fares should double and other ideas for a better transport system

~By: Gordon Lee~ In this article, I outline a total rework of…

Singapore should reconsider accepting the legality of prenuptial agreements

~by: Ghui~ China-born singer Zhang MiaoYu has no qualms about telling you…