The proposed wearable device for contract tracing is not a tracking device and will not have GPS capabilities nor mobile internet connectivity, the Minister-in-charge of the Smart Nation initiative Vivian Balakrishnan said in a media briefing on Monday (8 June).

The Minister repeatedly emphasized that the device – which will be named TraceTogether token – will not be able to track users’ movements and locations as it does not have GPS.

“It is not a tracking device. It is not an electronic tag, as some Internet commentaries have fretted about in particular,” said Mr Balakrishnan.

As there would be no internet connectivity in the device, there is no possibility of data being uploaded without the consent of the user, he added.

In fact, the device only uses Bluetooth proximity data which will be encrypted and stored in the phone for up to 25 days before it automatically deleted from the phone.

“It’s worth emphasizing that there isn’t one big giant centralised database. In fact, the data is decentralised and encrypted on phones and on devices and only uploaded if [the user] is positive,” the Minister remarked.

The data will be extracted from the phone if a user is infected with the COVID-19 disease, which Mr Balakrishnan reassured that only a “small number of personnel have access to the data for contact tracing purposes”, adding that they are covered by the Official Secrets Act.

“Even the finite silos of data that are uploaded are protected by the public sector data security recommendations. All the officers involved are covered by the Official Secrets Act and we will continue to audit and make sure no data leakage occurs,” he said.

In addition, Mr Balakrishnan said in Parliament on 5 June that the device will have the same function as the TraceTogether mobile application – which uses Bluetooth proximity data.

He hinted that the new device will be progressively distributed to everyone in Singapore if it works. The first batch of the device will be delivered later this month.

Netizens still “not convinced” that the TraceTogether token is not a tracking device

Despite the Minister had repeatedly emphasized that the wearable device for contact tracing – TraceTogether token – is not a tracking device, many netizens still refused to believe it.

Netizens were quick to criticize Mr Balakrishnan’s remarks on the device as they penned their thoughts under the comments section of Channel News Asia’s YouTube video – covering the media briefing. Some of them commented that the Government is “sugarcoating” to make the device sounds more “acceptable”.

While others are simply not convinced with the Minister’s explanation, noting that they do not want their privacy to be invaded by being tracked by the device.

Noting that the wearable device has no GPS and mobile internet connectivity, one netizen asked whether the Government would still be able to track every wearable device if it sets up Bluetooth signals across the nation.

Another netizen said that the Minister “can fool” the “non-tech savvy” individuals, but those who understand how technology works would know that Bluetooth is “a form of transmission” that can enable tracking. Hence, he implored the Government to use the financial resources on swab tests instead.

Concerns about privacy issue were previously raised by Singaporeans following the wearable device

Meanwhile, the Minister’s announcement on the TraceTogether token had raised some concerns about privacy issues among Singaporeans.

A petition titledSingapore says ‘No’ to wearable devices for COVID-19 contact tracing – rejecting the development of the TraceTogether token – has garnered more than 37,000 signatories at the time of writing.

The Singapore People’s Party (SPP) also released a statement authored by its Assistant Secretary-General Ariffin Sha on 7 June, urging the Government to “tread with utmost caution and regard for the privacy of Singaporeans”.

The Party also raised concerns in relation to cybersecurity issues and highlighted the Government’s recent track record in relation to cybersecurity, noting that it “leaves much to be desired”.

“Privacy is a fundamental right and is about protecting information, not hiding it. A lack of privacy can create very serious risks, at both an individual and national level,” the SPP remarked.

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SPF: Overall crime in Singapore decreased by 2.6 percent

Singapore Police Force has announced that overall crime decreased by 2.6 percent,…

Tampines Dormitory becomes fifth foreign worker dorm to be declared as isolation area

Yesterday (9 April), the Tampines Dormitory was declared an isolation area after…

Hard Truths apply to WP too

~Editorial~ The Yaw Shin Leong fiasco has the potential to do irreparable…

军人闯砂边界绑架五平民 印尼认错保证不重演

马国砂拉越的马印边界地区,惊传印尼军人闯入砂拉越境内,持械绑架五名砂拉越平民。他们先释放两人,再索要赎金,经马国军方斡旋后,最终另三人皆获释放。 根据《新海峡时报星期刊》报导,五名砂拉越人是在本月11日,是在毗邻印尼边界的Balai Ringin的甘榜Danau Melikin的森林收集木材,当地距离印尼加里曼丹边界仅400公尺。 他们遭到两名身穿军装迷彩服的男子伏击,他们身上有5.56毫米的Pindad SS-1突击步枪,是印尼国防部的标准武器装备。 被迫承认偷盗木材 五人全被捆绑,人质年龄介于15至64岁。他们被押往印尼境内的双溪恩特里哨站,还被迫承认偷印尼木材,头上被盖上黑色帽子。间中,印尼军人被指拿枪指着人质,还对空中开了两枪。 人质后来向警方投诉,除了背部和腿部遭军人鞭打,他们还被役使前往河边,帮军人收集食用水。 五名人质中,其中一对兄弟在11日下午四时左右就被释放,但另三人还在印尼军人的哨站过夜。被释放者被要求告知家属,需准备一万令吉赎金和两个新电锯。 马军方介入谈判  隔天人质即获释…