As the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) conducted a Meet The People session online on Facebook Live, they asked the public to vote on the poll, asking the people if the Singaporean government handled the COVID-19 pandemic well.

According to the vote results, 43 per cent disagreed, 31 per cent somewhat disagreed, and 3 per cent of the voters agreed that the Government handled it well.

Tan Meng Wah responded to this topic by referring to an article he had written on his Facebook on 22 May. He explained that although his article wrote about COVID-19, he was actually emphasising on the governance model.

Ministerial Task Force mishandled COVID-19

The industry consultant stated that the “seed” of the COVID-19 mishandling was sowed the moment the Ministerial Task Force was formed at the beginning of the year. Since the Task Force was made up of ministers, Dr Tan believed that it had reflected the mindset of the ruling party.

He then expressed that this move was to create an opportunity for the ministers to combat the crisis in order to gain the people’s trust.

“This is an opportunity to make it a political success because of the impending GE. If they’re able to demonstrate the ministers or 4G leaders are able to tackle the crisis, then they will gain the trust of (the) people.”

Not just that, Dr Tan mentioned that the ministers had made assumptions based on what they learned during the SARS crisis. By comparing that SARS and COVID-19 are different viruses, he added that Singapore is also different now, as compared to 2003 when SARS hit.

Other than addressing that Singapore is currently more open globally and more foreigners had been coming, he noted that the population in the nation had grown significantly.

While SARS could only transmit after the symptoms were developed, COVID-19 could be transmitted while an individual is asymptomatic.

He stressed that this piece of information was already available on 14 January and that the Task Force was formed on 22 January, implying that the Task Force should have been informed about it.

Dr Tan thought that the Task Force was handling COVID-19 based on Singapore’s experience in handling SARS.

Other than the comparisons made, he also addressed how the Task Force insisted on the “no face mask” policy even after the confirmation that COVID-19 is infectious back in February. This implied that the Task Force did not take urgent action to implement the use of face masks to protect the people.

Acknowledging that the Task Force managed to “recover quickly” by introducing the fiscal policies to help SMEs and households, Dr Tan stressed that damage had already been done at that point.

The damage had led to the implementing of circuit breaker (CB), and due to the CB, a lot of SMEs were not able to survive even with the support given by the Government.

“Overall, even though the Task Force recovered very quickly by implementing the fiscal policies and the four packages to help the SMEs and households, the damage has already been done because of the decision that they made.”

“As a result, the circuit breaker was implemented. And because of the CB, a lot of livelihoods are affected. A lot of SMEs may not be able to survive, even with the physical support.”

Following his observation on the Task Force’s performance, he then went back to focusing on the governance model that he mentioned earlier, questioning if Singapore has the “best leader” in place, as well as the objectives of the 4G leaders.

Dr Tan was concerned if the intention of a 4G leader was for the best interests of Singapore as a whole, or it was just a vested interest.

“We need to really look at the governance model and ask the question whether we’re having the best leader in place…”

“What is the objective of the 4G leader? Are they working for the interests of Singapore as a whole, or are they working for the interests of specific groups of people like elites or what we call vested interest?”

He ended his response by urging Singaporeans to ask themselves these questions.

Subscribe
Notify of
16 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国家剧场尖棱代表国旗五星? 《海峡时报》诠释遭建筑师打脸

上周,本地英文媒体《海峡时报》在脸书上载一则短片,纪念国家剧场在1963年8月8日开幕。在文字说明中,该报称该剧场标志性的五个擎天尖棱结构,代表着新加坡国旗上的五星。 然而,有关解说随即遭到新加坡科技设计大学客座助理教授赖启健反驳,指出这是很主观的诠释。 有网民就提出,有关代表国旗五星说,也被记载在国家图书馆局官方网站,此外还有剧场前的喷泉,则代表国旗上的新月。 对此,赖启健说明,两种说法都有谬误,是很主观的诠释,但是久而久之所有人都信以为真了。“不管是图书馆局还是国家文物局都错了,现在轮到《海峡时报》。” 在过去受国家博物馆之邀,讲解国内四大代表性建筑的讲座,赖启健曾指出,由本地大师王匡国操刀,国家剧场有了不起的建筑设计,其中五个擎天尖棱,它们连同舞台和边墙,支撑起剧场的横梁。(见以下短片) 赖启健也引用王匡国的著作《意外国家的生活追忆》,指出五大尖棱的建设从未用以代表国旗上的五星,至于喷泉也不属国家剧场的部分,而是后期由副总理杜进才博士推广美化计划,才在较后完成的。(见文章开端的照片,显示剧场在喷泉落成前后的景观。) 媒体仰赖官方机构,例如国家图书馆局提供的资料。然而即便掌控国家重要文史资料的机构,也会收藏与事实不符的信息。 更何况,国家剧场在我国历史上是富有代表性的建筑,其设计师对建筑的功能理应做了充足的描述,但是如果国家文史机构记载与史实不符的资讯,引起民众对历史认知出现谬误,误导历史观的情况是令人不安的。

尚达曼:未来一年面对艰巨挑战 放眼未来一年创造10万就业与培训机会

国务资政兼社会政策统筹部长尚达曼坦言,未来半年至一年的时间,我们面对的重大和迫切的挑战,即使阻断措施后逐步放宽,仍有许多人可能因疫情失去工作。 全球经济前景暗淡,一些行业仍会招聘人员,而政府将尽力协助他们,但没人敢说冠病19疫情会持续多久,尚达曼称,恐怕明年的职缺将少得多。 尚达曼是在个人脸书发文表示,他领导的全国就业理事会,放眼未来一年,透过副总理王瑞杰公布的新心相连就业与技能配套(SGUnited Jobs and Skills Package),为求职者创造10万个就业和培训机会。 “要实现这一目标将是一项挑战,但我们可以通过劳资政的紧密协作,超越既定方法来取得成功。我们将竭尽所能在公共和私企创造这些机会。” 他表示理事会也特别关注本地中年和年长工友,大家都必须改变思维应对新局势,例如雇主不应认为年长工友“太老、资历过高、适应能力不足”而拒绝雇用。 “政府为雇主提供了有力支持,每个雇主都必须成为团队的一员,以应对就业挑战。”

行动党公布完整中央执委名单:王瑞杰任第一助理秘书长

人民行动党于今日公布,新一届中央执行委员会完整名单。财政部长王瑞杰任第一助理秘书长,贸工部长陈振声任第二助理秘书长。 该党主席和副主席职位,则分别由卫生部长颜金勇和环境及水源部长马善高担任。 内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根任财政,教育部长王乙康任主力财政一职。 行动党新中央执行委员会名单 主席:颜金勇 副主席:马善高 秘书长:李显龙 第一助理秘书长:王瑞杰 第二助理秘书长:陈振声 财政:尚穆根 助理财政:王乙康 组织秘书:傅海燕、李智陞(复选增补)…

Civil society rights groups criticise Thai govt move to declare ’emergency’ decree to thwart pro-democracy protests

Civil society rights groups on Thursday (15 October) criticised the Thailand government’s…