Since the Government introduced the contact tracing mobile application TraceTogether to facilitate contact tracing amid the COVID-19 pandemic, it has not been well-received by Singaporeans as many refused to download the app.

Regarding this matter, Member of Parliament (MP) for Sembawang GRC Vikram Nair asked the Minister-in-charge of the Smart Nation initiative Vivian Balakrishnan if the Government has plans to make it mandatory for Singaporeans to download the aforementioned mobile app.

Dr Balakrishnan said in Parliament on Friday (5 June) that the Government will not make the download compulsory, citing the reason that the app did not work equally well across different smartphone operating systems, like iOS and Android.

He explained that Apple’s iOS suspends Bluetooth scanning when the app is running in the background. This situation would require iOS users to use the app in the foreground without interference by other applications.

“We’ve had repeated discussions at both the technical and policy level with Apple, but we have not yet been able to find a satisfactory solution.”

Furthermore, Dr Balakrishnan described that having one-fifth of the Singaporean population download TraceTogether was an “encouraging” figure.

However, he proceeded to announce that the Government is developing a new “portable and wearable” device, which will be distributed to everyone in the nation.

“If this portable device works, we may then distribute it to everyone in Singapore. And I believe this will be more inclusive, and it will ensure that all of us will be protected,” Dr Balakrishnan elaborated.

He stated that the new contact tracing device will “achieve the same objectives” as the TraceTogether app, but it does not require a smartphone to work.

In justifying why contact tracing app and device are heavily promoted by the Government, Dr Balakrishnan noted that contact tracing has become a “necessity” especially now that Singapore has exited the circuit breaker (CB) period.

Understanding that people do not specifically need the contact tracing app when they are at home during CB, he stressed that more people are going out and about, which would increase the chances of being in close contact with others post-CB.

Dr Balakrishnan went on to say that contact tracing is a “professional skill” that would require human judgment.

Therefore, he hoped that Singaporeans will work with the Government to reduce the incidence of clusters with the support of “better and faster” contact tracing.

“If we can reduce the incidence of clusters by better and faster contact tracing, then we can avoid having to reintroduce restrictive circuit breaker measures in the future.”

“I hope that all members of the public will work with us to achieve this.”

About TraceTogether’s data confidentiality

In regards to TraceTogether’s user privacy, Dr Balakrishnan explained that personal data is stored on the user’s mobile phone and that it is strictly used for contact tracing. The data will be accessed by the Ministry of Health (MOH) when a user is tested COVID-19 positive.

He assured that the data is protected from “malicious hackers”, adding that it will be deleted from the phone once it is older than 25 days, as reported by Channel News Asia.

According to Dr Balakrishnan, only a small group of authorised officers in MOH will have access to the data if close contact data is required for contact tracing.

“There are safeguards including encryption in place to protect this from malicious hackers and the data that’s older than 25 days will be automatically deleted from your phone.”

“If the close contact data is required for contact tracing, only a small group of authorised officers in MOH will have access to it.”

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

蔡厝港械斗事件:13人被逮捕,五人被控上法庭

日前,蔡厝港德惠巷101座組屋附近发生可怕械斗事件,反恐紧急应对部队出动,警方将13名嫌疑人逮捕归案。该13名嫌疑人于2月29日被控上法庭,而第14名嫌疑人在近日被逮捕后,于今日(4日)被起诉。 事发当时,两群人正在械斗,其中一群人含至少八人,手握刀和手杖,而另一群则至少有5人,携带巴朗刀(Parang),双方正在互相殴打。 由于当时大批人员正在械斗,附近的居民也纷纷将其拍下,甚至录影,有目击者拍到当时有一群人正对着一名男子殴打,也有目击者拍到当时嫌疑人正在组屋下四处走动并大声叫嚣。 随后,警方便全副武装抵达现场,准备缉拿闹事者。 事发后,一名自称是伤者妹妹的人表示,自己的哥哥的尾指已经断了,并拍下视频,以马来文表示,“是谁将我哥哥的手指砍断,我一定把你揪出来,你给我小心点。”视频显示,那名男子的手掌被开了道很深的口子,血流如注。 2月29日,13名嫌疑人均被控上法庭,包括两名18岁的少年法汗、海克尔,以及20岁的罗斯兰被指使用致命武器闹事,违反刑事法典第148条,一旦罪成,将可被判最高10年加鞭苔。 而另两名则是18岁的萨法力与17岁的扎希鲁丁,被指非法集会与携带致命武器,若罪成,将可判处最高五年监禁或罚款。 而第14名嫌疑人赫尔米则被指违反《腐蚀性、爆炸性物质及进攻性武器法》,一旦罪成,将可判处最高三年以上监禁,和至少鞭苔六下。 五名嫌疑人今日也随同警方重返现场,讲述事情经过。 目前案件仍在侦办中,以确定其余8人或更多嫌疑人涉案。

新加坡保安协会质疑评估制 吁当局改善现有评估标准

新加坡保安协会发表措辞强烈声明,对政府最新的保安机构评估结果持质疑态度,认为当局有必要改善评估标准和方法。 该协会代表国内180个保安机构。协会执行董事依山(Ikhsan)认为,评估结果获得A级与B级的保安机构,都和去年相仿,可能给予外界印象,认为他们并没有进步。 保安协会认为,现有制度根据钟形曲线(bell curve)评级,但尽管总得分95以上的机构有增长三分之一,惟仅63家机构能获得A评级。 针对上述协会的声明,内政部则在昨日傍晚回应,指评估制一项透明,所有保安机构都清楚,再者更改评估制也有是咨询过业界,且事先知会各机构。 自从2009年推行以来,该评估制协助提升保安业的专业和水准;大部分业者都维持和提升评估表现,至于连年表现欠佳者责备吊销执照。 政府在去年起调整保安业分级制评估标准,旨在针对这些保安机构表现,进行独立的年度评估。这些评估类别分为:程序(35巴仙)、人员(22巴仙)、系统与科技(20巴仙)、雇佣制度(15巴仙)以及反恐(8巴仙)。 评级具商业意义  客户货比三家 今年共有235家保安机构参与评估,多达63家获得A级(26.81巴仙)、105家获B评级(44.68巴仙)以及64家得到C评级。仅3家保安机构获得D级。 依山也补充,评级对于保安机构具有商业意义,客户会根据评级货比三家。 保安员的处境…

Actor Shrey Bhargava pleads for release of audition tape by JTeam to show the truth

Local actor, Shrey Bhargava who caused a resurgence of discussion on racial stereotyping…