Image source: Flickr/ aquilaa1

The Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) of the Singapore Police Force, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), and the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) have launched a joint investigation into Hyflux and its current and former directors for suspected false and misleading statements, breach of disclosure requirements, as well as non-compliance with accounting standards.

The authorities said on Tuesday (2 June) that the investigation was launched after a review of Hyflux-related disclosure and compliance with accounting and auditing standards that was announced in April last year, upon which they discovered reasons to suspect that offences may have been committed.

According to the authorities, the review was an extensive exercise covering the announcements and financial statements issued by Hyflux over a period of eight years, between 2011 and 2018 inclusive.

“The investigation will ascertain whether there were lapses in Hyflux’s disclosures concerning the Tuaspring Integrated Water and Power Project (Tuaspring IWPP), as well as non-compliance with accounting standards between 2011 and 2018,” the authorities said in their statement.

As part of their investigation, the authorities stated that they have obtained accounting and other corporate records from Hyflux and its subsidiary Tuaspring, adding that Hyflux’s directors and key officers involved in Tuaspring IWPP have also been interviewed.

Speaking on the time needed for the full investigation, the authorities noted that an update will be provided when there is an outcome, given that the time needed to complete the investigation is subject to several factors including offence period and complexity of issues.

They added that they do not intend to interfere Hyflux’s current reorganisation plans with the criminal investigation.

“The investigations are not intended to interfere with Hyflux’s current reorganisation plans as they focus on determining the role of the subjects in the alleged disclosure lapses and non-compliance with accounting standards between 2011 and 2018.”

Responding to this issue, Hyflux in a bourse filing on Tuesday, stated that the authorities have sent a notice to the company, requesting it to provide certain information and documents relating to the Tuaspring desalination plant.

Hyflux noted that it will make further announcements as and when there are any updates, adding that the company is “presently assisting and will cooperate fully with CAD in its investigations”.

It is believed that those who served as board of directors during the period between 2011 and 2018, including company’s executive chairman Olivia Lum, will be under investigation.

High profile debt restructuring of Hyflux

The Tuaspring desalination plant, which is part of Hyflux’s Tuaspring IWPP project, was the largest seawater treatment plant integrated with a power generator in Singapore that supplies 70 million gallons of treated water per day for 25 years.

Costing Hyflux S$1.05 billion, this project was taken over by Singapore’s national water agency Public Utilities Board (PUB) last year after PUB terminated its Water Purchase Agreement (WPA) with Hyflux – due to the company’s financial debt.

In March last year, it was reported that around 500 people went to Hong Lim Park to protest against Hyflux after losing 80 to 97 per cent of their life savings and retirement funds invested in Hyflux preference shares and perpetual securities.

It was estimated some 34,000 retail investors had invested a sum of around S$900 million dollars in Hyflux preference shares and perpetual securities offered via two tranches in 2011 and 2016.

Furthermore, outstanding notes are also due, which amount to S$100 million (4.25 per cent) in 2018, S$65 million (4.6 per cent), and S$100 million (4.2 per cent) in 2019.

Hyflux had also called for its creditors to file proofs of claim, allowing the creditors such as trade creditors and bank lenders to receive payments as well as to vote on the scheme proposals during the scheme meeting with UAE utility company Utico in April 2019.

Prior to this, 73 parties had filed proofs of claim totalling S$3.51 billion as a preliminary before the scheme meetings. This took place while the Indonesian investment firm Salim-Medco was still offering the rescue package deal.

During this time, some of the biggest claim amounts were filed by retail PnP investors. Medium-term noteholders were claiming S$277.7 million, holders of S$400 million (8 per cent preference shares) were claiming S$429.3 million, and holders of S$500 million (6 per cent perps) were claiming S$540.7 million.

Among other claiming creditors also include the Singaporean banking corporation, DBS Bank, Tahlyat Myah Magtaa SpA, Ascendas Reit, Singapore branch of Mizuho Bank, KfW Ipex-Bank, and ESR-Reit.

Earlier in January this year, Hyflux’s debt moratorium was granted extension by the High Court as WongPartnership discharged themselves as legal representatives to Hyflux legally, concerning the issue of “withdrawal for loss of confidence and other good cause”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

将上诉市镇会诉讼判决 林瑞莲指王瑞杰提动议“言之过早”

上月11日,高庭法官加南拉美斯(Kannan Ramesh)宣读判词,指工人党主席林瑞莲、秘书长毕丹星和前秘书长刘程强,须为阿裕尼-后港市镇会蒙受损失,承担法律责任。 故此,副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰,于今日在国会提动议,要求刘程强和林瑞莲回避一切和阿裕尼-后港市镇会相关财政事务。 不过林瑞莲也回应,他们将对有关市镇会诉讼判决提出上诉,且截止日是在下周一(11日),故此王瑞杰的动议似乎“言之过早”。 她提醒不满判决一方有一个月期限可提出上诉。她也指出,他们仍在和律师研究有关判决,也向议会报告,他们将对此诉讼提出上诉,要求议员们拒绝王瑞杰的动议。 王瑞杰充重申议员应保持高标准诚信和责任感,在发言时多次引述高庭判决中对工人党的指责,也要求该党不该躲避,应对此做出解释。 “将近四周已过,但工人党仍保持沉默,未对此作出道歉,以及如何解决失误。”他也把问题抛向现任阿裕尼后港市镇会主席费沙和其他工人党议员,包括费沙会否对阿裕尼和后港居民道歉,以及解除林瑞莲作为市镇会副主席的职务。 他认为,如果直到上诉前什么都不做,那么可认定工人党实际上默许“不诚实和违反信托义务的行为”,甚至是共谋的。 有关市镇会从2011年7月至2015年7月间,支付了FMSS公司多达3370万元。这段期间,林瑞莲为市镇会主席,而刘程强当时为工人党秘书长。至于毕丹星当时担任市镇会招标与合约委员会成员。 去年10月初,高庭展开对工人党市镇会诉讼审讯,阿裕尼—后港市镇会(AHTC)和白沙—榜鹅市镇会(PRPTC)指责刘程强、林瑞莲、毕丹星等八造,必须对2011年5月至2015年11月期间,对第三方承包商的不当付款行为负起责任以及索偿。  

TOC Op-ed: Awake, Jim Sleeper

By Choo Zheng Xi/ Consultant Editor Yale lecturer Jim Sleeper’s provocatively titled…