Stockphoto of a restaurant business

On Thursday (28 May), Facebook page SG Turf – Singapore Tenants United For Fairness highlighted a case about a tenant in a mall who was subjected to unfair treatment by the landlord.
In the post, it was stated that the tenant, Randy (not his real name), was first approached by a Government Agency to open his own restaurant outlet at a newly built mall a few years ago. The management of the mall was handled by a Real Estate Agency (which we will address as the Landlord in this article).
Given that this new mall was located at a “high traffic location”, Randy’s rental rate was also on the higher side, at S$20,000 per month. However, since it was purely a commercial mall, there weren’t any anchor tenant like a supermarket or departmental store in it to draw in foot traffic.
As such, SG Turf said in the post that the Landlord promised to carry out numerous high profile events and activities to draw in customers into the premise. In fact, this was promised to all the tenants before they were recruited into the mall.
“Initially, there was a lot of buzz and hype about how this mall would be a great gathering location for many people of similar interests. Tenants were recruited with promises of many high profile events and organised activities,” SG Turf stated.
It added that with no anchor tenants in the mall, “footfall was thus extremely dependent on the planning and execution of such activities”.
Unfortunately, things took an ugly turn after a few weeks due to a number of different issues.
“Firstly, the buzz never came. Then the promised activities and events were far and between. Footfall was pathetic. Targeted crowds were not attracted. There were also many severe mismanagement issues.”
As expected, all shops in the malls were losing thousands and thousands of dollars every month.
After three months, all the tenants came together to request the Landlord to take some measures to solve the problem. Some of the things they requested include increased advertising and promotion and for the mall to carry out more activities to draw in more foot traffic, as well as to reduce the rental fees so the tenants’ burden will be lifted off their shoulders slightly.
Eventually, the Landlord agreed to reduce the rental by 20 per cent, which means Randy still has to pay S$16,000 “for a shop in a ghost town”.

Calls it quits

Three months later, Randy decided to call it quits and requested the Landlord to “take over his restaurant and all its nicely done up renovations and furnishing for free”. He even decided to forgo the Security Deposit, but the Landlord refused the request.
“He would even give up the three months’ worth of Security Deposit. But alas, they [the Landlord] refused (which says a lot).”
To make it worse, the Landlord “demanded” Randy to pay the remaining rental amount until the end of the lease, which is coming up to S$600,000.
“No, he did not have $600K nor did he have the means to continue operating at such brutal losses each month. Randy eventually shut down operations without approval. He did not have a choice,” SG Turf noted.
Soon after that, it was revealed that the Landlord decided to sue Randy, which was described as “the most cruel and extreme route” in the post.
However, the matter was resolved after a few “exhausting court sessions”, and the Landlord decided to settle on a “lower but equally appalling sum of compensation”.
Despite settling at a lower amount, Randy still lost half a million in the lawsuit.
“So did most of the other tenants who left one after another. All because they believed. And trusted such an organisation to have done better. Done fairer. But it did not,” SG Turf wrote.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

非法入境船只遭拦截 警捕三人今日提控

两名印尼籍男女与一名马国男子因非法入境新加坡,被警察海岸卫队发现并逮捕,今日(14日)即将面临控诉。 新加坡警察昨日发文告指出,警察海岸卫队于1月12日晚间9点13分左右柔佛海峡东部的浮标附近海域监测到一艘没有编号的小艇。 其中有两人两人在被发现后跳入水中,只有一人仍在船上,但不久后,一名跳水的男子又再度游回来并登上船。 警察海岸卫队也立即拦截船只,并在船上逮捕了两名印尼籍男女,分别为44岁与41岁,而39岁马国男子则在附近的海域被捕,相信是该船船夫。 经初步调查,两名印尼籍男女相信是要到马来西亚寻找工作,而三人则在非法入境新加坡罪被捕,马国男子也因涉嫌从事非法移民生意而正接受警方调查。三人将于今天被控上法庭。 非法入境一经定罪,将被判入狱长达六个月以及鞭苔至少三下。

王乙康称会馆会员获2B阶段报名优先权 以铭记创立学校的根源

针对会馆会员在为孩子报名属下小学一年级时,拥有2B阶段报名优先权,经常让公众不解,教育部长王乙康解释,这是为了不让国人忘记,这些政府辅助学校的历史和根源。 王乙康昨日(5日)在新加坡福建会馆教师节晚宴上说,政府辅助学校中的利益相关者、家长与社区都是我国教育体系下的主要合作伙伴,时至今日,他们继续维护学校与社群文化,协助培养下一代健全的价值观,为学生提供全面发展的教育。 王乙康也解释,自我国的自治、独立与增长后,政府向政府辅助学校提供了与政府学校相同条件的服务,包括发放教职员工的薪水,使得学校管理委员会的资金压力大大舒缓,能够更专注在学校的运营上。 谈及政府辅助学校的资源,王乙康说,华族会馆早期为了满足当时社会对教育的需求,就已创立辅助学校,成为政府辅助学校的重要部分。 我国教育制度可分成两大类:政府学校,以及政府辅助学校,其中政府辅助学校,是由社群成立并服务于社群。 它们自主组建教职委员会并为了学校的持续发展而筹集资金。鉴于起源和历史背景,这些学校也承载了创校社群的精神、文化和价值观。比如由福建会馆办的道南、爱同、光华等学校,连同许多其他社群学校,就属于“政府辅助学校”。

Chinese government invites foreign media to Xinjiang to paint a positive image of its Muslim Uighur’s ‘re-education’ camps, but it backfired

In April this year, the Information Office of the State Council of…

SRX data: Higher demand for HDB flats, rental apartments in March possibly due to pandemic

Market watchers believe that the measures deployed to combat COVID-19 pandemic is…