On Saturday (23 May), the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) hosted a virtual forum titled “The World has Changed with the Pandemic. Can Singapore?” featuring civil society activist and veteran Constance Singam, playwright Alfian Sa’at, playwright and policy researcher Tan Tarn How, journalist Kirsten Han and party Chairman Dr Paul Tambyah.
During the discussion, Mr Tan, who is an adjunct senior research fellow at the Institute of Policy Research (Singapore) and former editor of Straits Times, proposed three ways the country can improve things in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, all of which relate to the question of inequalities and inequities in the country.
Mr Tan noted that these problems are not new; it’s just that the pandemic has brought them into focus.
“Now that it has happened, we are duty bound to solve them,” said the playwright.

Ridding the gross inequality of power between migrant workers and their employers and the government

His first proposal relates to the inequalities faced by the roughly one million low-wage migrant workers in Singapore who work as domestic helpers, cleaners, and construction labour. Specifically, Mr Tan urges the improvement of living conditions for this group; something which the pandemic has shone a light on.
In the beginning of the outbreak at migrant worker dormitories, the unsanitary, cramped, and abysmal living conditions were highlighted by the media as well as migrant workers rights group like Transient Workers Count Too (TWC2) which had predicted that such condition would lead to a massive outbreak of COVID-19 among these workers.
The change Mr Tan proposed to address this problem is on a fundamental level. Namely, he proposed that we “get rid of the gross inequality in power between these guest workers and their employers and government”.

He says, “This inequality I believe, lies at the root of many of the problems that has led to the dormitories to become hotbeds of infection.”

Describing what these workers go through, Mr Tan asked listeners to put themselves in the shoes of these workers.
“You borrow that money and you come to work here. At the present moment, what happens is that you can have your work permit summarily taken away at the whim of your boss. So there’s no appeal. And if this happens before you have worked the years needed to pay off your loan, it means that you will be forced to return home with a potentially life burdening debt.”
Mr Tan went on to stress that it is “unjust” to subject any person to this type of situation.
He elaborated, “The workers’ vulnerability also engenders other injustices because he or she is afraid that any attempt to address them or to speak up might end with them on the next flight home.”
“But with more voice and agency for them, the sometimes poor conditions that have been allowed to happen would not have continued, for example.”
He added that we should also not put too much faith in the free market or private sector to solve these problems.

Providing a digital toolkit for all students who need it, no questions asked

Mr Tan’s next suggestion pertained to addressing inequities faced by students from low income families, noting that the pandemic has exposed the fact that many students do not have the means to afford the basic digital toolkit to properly participate in Singapore’s 21st Century education as the government has described it.
This lack of access to a computer and the internet has a snowball effect.

“Poor students with insufficient material and social resources will start primary school behind and will eventually end up even further back by the end of their school years,” said Mr Tan.

When circuit breaker measures came into effect in early April, students around the country transitioned into home-based learning. In doing so, the government has had to “scramble” to find 12,000 laptops and tablets to loan to students who have none, highlighted Mr Tan. Telecommunications companies have also come forward to offer free data connectivity to these students while civil societies like Engineering Good have also stepped up.
On this front, Mr Tan proposes that the Ministry of Education (MOE) must provide these fundamental tools for free. He said:

“The Ministry of Education must provide such fundamental tools and the equally important ancillaries that we must not forget such as software and repair and service for free to all students who need it. For free. And do it with no questions asked. Consider this digital package the basic income equivalent for education.”

Anticipating certain arguments against this proposal, Mr Tan said, “Of course there will be a minority who will abuse it as in any system, right. But we should get rid of the mindset which we often have in Singapore that because of a bad one or two percent of the people, we deny the 89 or 99 percent the benefit that comes from it.”
Mr Tan went on to argue that the government will be able to afford this digital toolkit as it would not add much to the total cost that the government is already spending on education—about 12,000 a year per primary student and 15,000 per secondary student in 2018.

A government pledge that no one should go hungry

Mr Tan’s final proposal is driven by the concern for those who cannot afford to properly feed themselves or their family. His proposal is simply that “no one who is at fault should go hungry in Singapore.”
“In fact, I will say that even if they are at fault, our conscience should not allow us to let them go hungry,” he added.
While some may be surprised that there are people who go hungry in Singapore, Mr Tan said that Channel NewAsia’s feature called “Going hungry in Singapore, a Cheap Food Paradise” illustrates that this is an unfortunate reality which has been exacerbated due to the pandemic, though to a lesser extent than the previously mentioned issues.
He said, “Already in normal times where charities have willing hearts and free food for all to partially fill some of these needs, in COVID times, grassroots efforts have also sprung up and strangely enough, this aspect of inequality has not really surfaced much during the pandemic like other issues.”
Mr Tan’s is most concerned for Singapore’s children, however, seeing as they are more vulnerable as minors and so “we have the additional care of duty towards them”.

Mr Tan proposed that the government and society make a simple pledge that no child would go hungry in this country.
“And in a rich country like us, having enough to eat should not depend on the vagaries of charity and should not entail the indignities often induced from being a recipient of charity or applying for it,” he lamented.

Mr Tan stressed that it is the government’s responsibility, the collective’s responsibility, to preserve each person’s right to an adequate diet, adding that the government will act only if citizens demand it.
He added that the poor should also not be made to go through hoops to get help, especially for basic need, whether it be in providing vouchers, free school lunches or other ideas. On this point, Mr Tan acknowledged his limited expertise in the area.
However, he did note that if this particular problem is as small as the government says it is, then the cost for addressing it should not be too high. Even if it is, we should still do it, says Mr Tan.

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

分享购物理念善用住家空间 Nas“炫住宅”引网民争议

从3月份决定定居“近乎完美”的新加坡,到商议定居住宿,再到分享透过”登山实验”来决定购物所需,著名网络旅游博客亚新(Nas Daily)一直是个话题人物。这次她分享到和住家空间有关的课题,却有些“炫富惹人眼红”的情况出现。 现年27岁的亚新,于上周五在其脸书上载了一个名为“旅行教你的东西”的视频,并写道“旅游有很多好处,但是这个……是最酷的。我发现减少衣服是最有效的减少杂乱方式。所以我拿走了整个衣柜,只放了我一直穿的一种T恤类型。我强烈推荐这种方式。” 他也欢迎人们到他的官方网站shop.nasdaily.com购买有关的T恤,但是他要求购买者必须抛出至少5件衣服,或者在购买前考虑5次。 登山实验决定购物选择 视频中分享了他在新加坡的住宅内容,表示连续了三年的旅游生活,终于有了一个居所,拥有了比以前都多的“空间”。 他指出,之前存放生活物品的空间,都必须通过登山实验来决定,所以其实只有一个背包的大小。他表示这样能够方便他旅行,背包中只装了10天分量的内裤和衣服。 “但是有了屋子后,你的空间就很大了,就会想要买很多东西。在我们还没有意识到的时候,屋子的空间就会被充满了,生活也变得杂乱了” 他指出,这也导致旅行时要带在身上的东西变多了,更别提能够成功通过登山实验。 “因此对我来说,长期旅行是我生命中发生最好的事情,它告诉我购物时必须谨慎、我们生活并不需要许多东西,以及杂乱可以自内心中开始毁了自己。” 所以在家具方面,他只买了一张床、两个枕头和家具,而在购买其他物件时,都以“登山实验”来决定。 喜悦并非来自物件…

PAP’s Murali Pillai and Amy Khor must sign petition calling for preservation of Bukit Batok Hillside Park: Dr Chee Soon Juan

People’s Action Party’s (PAP) Murali Pillai and Amy Khor must sign the…

116 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 24 cases linked to North Coast Lodge

As of Tuesday noon (24 Aug), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

华侨中学一英籍教师 涉吸毒拥毒被控

一名英国籍的华侨中学人文科教师,因涉吸毒拥毒,在今日被控四项毒品相关罪状。 名为布尔格(Burge Christopher David) 的65岁教师,以1万元获保释,并将在下月1日再次出庭。 根据控状,布尔格吸食安非他命,并在去年的9月14日和19日,被发现企图购买五包安非他命毒品。 控状指,在去年9月20日晚,布尔格在林登通道85B单位里,拥有供吸毒用的器皿和一包毒品。当天,他还在那里接受了一包重量至少为6.12克的毒品。这些药物含有合成大麻中的活性成分。 布尔格是在去年9月22日被提控。其辩护律师则申诉被告心理报告未出炉,为此法官裁示布尔格在下月再出庭。 因吸毒和拥毒,布尔格科面临最高10年监禁或两万元的罚款,或两者兼施。 拥有吸毒器具,也可让他面对三年监禁以及一万元的罚款。