With all the safe and social distancing measures enforced in Singapore because of the COVID-19 pandemic and the circuit breaker that was set up to contain the virus, Singaporeans are instructed to stay home and avoid all social activities.
Beer distributor and former chocolatier, Lim Jialiang, recently shared his opinion regarding the irony that he observed during the circuit breaker period.
Mr Lim, who has often been cited in news for his opinions, questioned the importance of the National Day Parade (NDP) when citizens have been fined for breaking the circuit breaker measures, and that Muslims have to stay home and are not allowed to do house visits for Hari Raya.

Understanding that these measures and punishments were meant for the bigger picture—to cease the spread of COVID-19 in the community—Mr Lim stressed that these “important cultural and social functions” had to be halted.
However, despite people missing out on important festivities and social activities, the Government insists on carrying on with NDP2020. Mr Lim felt that there is an unbalanced preference displayed by the Government that has chosen to prioritise NDP2020 instead.

So you fine seniors and break up their social gatherings, you tell muslims that they have to stay at home and not do house visiting during Raya, in the name of public health. We are all aware that for the sake of public health, these important cultural and social functions that we value and treasure have to be put on hold for the time being. But when it comes to the National Day Parade, we must hold your military orgasms to make your generals feel shiok-shiok.”

The former chocolatier who founded Demochoco, a chocolate truffle business, went on to point out that the way PAP politicians were busy increasing their public exposure had somehow obscured the line between charity and electioneering amid a global pandemic.
Not just that, but the vital NGOs that are not “government-aligned” or “-approved” had to fight to be classified as essential.

“Our PAP politicians dart in and out of places, cosplaying as social-distancing ambassadors, giving out masks and hand santisers, and obscuring the line between charity and electioneering. At the same time, vital NGOs that are not government-aligned or approved of have to fight with MTI to be classified as essential.”

Seeing how certain Singaporeans were not satisfied with the crisis response exhibited by the Government, Mr Lim claimed that the authorities are “gaslighting” Singaporeans by accusing the citizens of not being supportive.
Moreover, he also implied that the Government was using the decline in COVID-19 community cases as a reason to question the people’s lack of support.
Apart from acknowledging that Singaporeans had largely supported the Government and followed the lead of the public health officials and politicians, Mr Lim suggested that the Government’s election strategy involves “browbeating” and shaming the Singaporean people to vote for them.

“Now, you are gaslighting Singaporeans by saying that we are somehow not supportive, even though the cases in the community has come down to single digits (your own metrics, mind you). Singaporeans have by and large supported the government and followed the lead of public health officials and politicians. If your election strategy is to browbeat and shame Singaporeans to the polls to give you our votes, I wish I can share this inexplicable optimism of yours.”

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Hwa Chong alumni express "shock" at relationship programme

A group of petitioners who say they are alumni of Hwa Chong…

SOS Bukit Brown – sorry to hear Tan Chuan-Jin's priorities

The following is a media release by SOS Bukit Brown in response…

That “little increase” in hawker stall rental rates means “a lot” to hawkers, Makansutra founder KF Seetoh responds to NEA

Even that “little increase” in the rental rates would mean “a lot”…

各界对防假消息法存异议 报业控股与新传媒续缄默

自《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》(POFMA)于4月1日提呈国会,引起各界人士声讨与议论,不少维权团体纷纷促请政府再三检讨相关法案,并且呼吁政府修订甚至是撤回相关法案。 其中,亚洲人权与发展论坛 (FORUM-ASIA)与世界公民参与联盟(CIVICUS)随即于4月2日联合发出声明。其重点为检讨该法案内容,认为“政府向本已受严密监控言论的社会大众丢出烟雾弹,以此抑制自由言论与异议。” 他们亦强调,该法案提供当局定义和裁定何谓“真伪消息”的权力,可能会剥削维权人士与团体进行网络评论的权利,并不符合人权法中言论自由的标准。 FORUM-ASIA和CIVICUS致力于保护与加强所有人权,包括发展权,加強全世界公民行动和公民社会的国际非营利组织。 各界对POFMA影响表关注 与此同时,亚洲互联网联盟(AIC)也发出文告说明,相关法律将赋予新加坡政府绝对的酌情权来判定真假消息。AIC表示,该项法案影响深远,政府过度介入已侵犯新加坡人民的自由言论权,必会对新加坡与国际关系带来严重影响。 虽然AIC对政府保护社会和谐、完整性与政治进程的目的表示支持,但对于“缺乏向公众,尤其是各方利益攸关者如企业、媒体、民间团体、种族与国际征询意见”而感到相当失望。 因此,该协会也表明立场,认为《防假消息法》的首要解决方案不应是对付细微差别和复杂的课题。 AIC也指出会积极与政府沟通来处理所谓的“错误信息”,同时也希望此法案不会对公共辩论与公开交流带来影响。 AIC是由互联网与技术公司组成的行业协会,协会成员含苹果、脸书、谷歌、智游网(Expedia group)、亚马逊、LINE、乐天、Airbnb、推特、雅虎以及繽客(Booking.com)。 独立文学出版商《社会思潮出版社》(Ethos…