The National Day Parade (NDP) 2020 Executive Committee has earlier announced on Wednesday (20 May) that NDP2020 will go on despite the COVID-19 outbreak in Singapore that is still progressing to date.
Along with the announcement on its official website, the Committee revealed that Funpack will be distributed to every Singaporean and Singapore Permanent Resident (PR) household. However, this particular move received backlash from a segment of Singaporeans, commenting that it is a “waste of resources”.
Many Facebook users left their opinions regarding the Funpack, saying how it’s “nothing fun” amid a global pandemic.
Some of them suggested to opt-out from receiving the Funpack so that it could be given to people “who really need it”.
To prevent the wastage of resources, a petition was created by an NUS student, Kaushik Ilango, on Change.org for Singaporeans and PRs who do not wish to receive the Funpack.
Describing how 2020 has been “one of the darkest years” for many Singaporeans, Mr Ilango acknowledged the Committee for attempting to bring “happiness and positivity” to the citizens. He also believes that the Funpack would indeed bring joy to many Singaporeans.

“At a time like this, I understand that handing out funpacks, ‘something Singaporeans have a close affinity with’ could certainly bring joy to many of us.”

He went on to express that the resources gathered to make approximately 1.4 million Funpacks could be allocated for better use.

“However, I believe that there could be a much better use of the resources used to make roughly 1.4 million funpacks; such as the perishable goods inside the funpack, the novel single-use items, the manpower to acquire, make and distribute the funpacks and not to mention the planning of it.”

Addressing that not every item included in the Funpack is of long term use, Mr Ilango wrote that many of these Funpacks tend to get thrown away at the end of NDP in the previous years.
Other than that, he is aware that the economic recession is happening in Singapore and that unemployment is on the rise. Therefore, he believed that these resources could, in turn, help the people in need during trying times like this.
As a way to help those people, Mr Ilango would like to give away his Funpack to someone who needs it more than he does. He also wished that these Funpacks would not be discarded irresponsibly by the citizens who do not want them.
To support his point, he stated that the irresponsible disposal of the Funpacks will require more manpower to clean up. Moreover, the student thought that Singapore could take this chance to move towards a zero-waste society.

“This will only require more manpower to clean it up. Singapore could also use this as an opportunity to set the right example of moving towards a zero-waste society in times of rapid climate change to the rest of the world.”

Mr Ilango added that he understood how the Funpack has sentimental value for many and he does not wish to deprive those Singaporeans of that. So he thought that it would be a better idea to let citizens opt-out from receiving the Funpacks.
In an update, Mr Ilango noted that many of those who signed the petition has reached out to him, regarding the details of this issue, like whether the funpack procurement has already occurred and if so what would happen to it, what will the budget be spent on instead, who is in-charge of making the decision etc.
He confessed that he is “not in a better position to answer these than any one of us” and noted that he has since reached out to Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen along with this petition and will keep the petition signatories updated on any developments.
As of writing, more than 40,000 people have signed the petition.

Funpack is a “waste of resources”

Many people left their comments under the petition as an additional way to support this idea.
Yu Shin Chan expressed that the resources utilised into making the Funpack could be “diverted to better causes”. Explaining that the essential workers such as nurses, doctors and cleaners had been working tirelessly, Chan believed that they should be given the priority instead.
Besides that, Chan commented that giving Funpacks is “extremely unsustainable at solving pertinent problems”, and it is also not environmentally friendly.

Kavitha Krishnan stated that the Funpack is “not the best way to encourage solidarity”. And she had also commented that the resources could have been channelled towards helping the people in need, especially the ones impacted by COVID-19.

Many other people had made similar comments about the Funpack, supporting the idea of rejecting the distribution. They believed that it was a waste of resources and money to make these Funpacks, and the money should be utilised to support the nation’s crisis response against COVID-19.

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

狮城学者困惑何以港警围堵商场 忧警民关系近崩溃未来冲突规模更大

新加坡国立大学政治学助理教授庄嘉颖,日前接受《星洲日报》采访,担心经过接二连三事件后,香港警民关系几近崩溃,未来冲突和暴力事件可能比以往更容易发生、规模更大。 尽管香港特首林郑月娥在7月9日宣布,《逃犯条例》修法“寿终正寝”,惟无助缓和香港紧张局势。示威港民坚持五大诉求:撤回修例、追究警察过度执法、不检控和释放反送中示威者、撤销暴动定性,以及要求特首林郑月娥问责下台。 上周末,香港再次爆发多出游行抗议。包括上水反水货客游行、沙田区反送中游行,均演变成大规模警民冲突。例如在周日(14日)晚港警攻入沙田新城市广场,期间示威者向警方丢掷雨伞杂物,而警方出动胡椒喷雾及警棍还击,事件造成20人受伤入院。 庄嘉颖对于何以港警将示威者围堵在沙田商场,感到疑惑,因为这可能让群众的情绪更为激烈。 他相信这会造成在未来的示威集会,即使警方进行一些合理执法,但示威者可能依据以往经验,认为警方可能会有更激烈行动,而选择先发制人;至于警方也可能判定示威者行为会更激烈,而采取更强硬的手法。 他认为,如果双方都抱持这样的心态,预计未来冲突、暴力事件更容易发生,规模也更大。 庄教授指出,过去港警和民众有一种默契,即只要不作出过度的行为,抗议完毕后就可三区,但这种默契基本上已破坏了。 近日也有传媒报导,港特首林郑月娥已多次请辞,但遭北京方面拒绝。不过庄嘉颖分析,目前港人对香港政府和整个政治体制已不信任,林郑辞职对于安抚民心只能起到短暂的效果,无济于事。 林郑下台无济于事 他反问,即使林郑下台,当前局势那么僵,谁又愿意接这烫手山芋?“至少我现在看不到有谁有能力破局。” 再者,若北京中央政府把林郑换下来,也形同承认北京当初在政策上误判,因为林郑也是中央任命的。但如果换上更强硬的人物,香港局势势必更僵。 他建议,暴力个案应个别处理,香港有完善的法律,发难者可经过法律程序审理。至于究竟集会、示威者是否等同“暴力”、“暴动”,应交由法院裁定,而不是行政部门。…

Helping the poor – too much money?

Leong Sze Hian / Andrew Loh We refer to new PAP candidate,…

It’s ideas and people that count

~by: Raymond Anthony Fernando~ How much difference can one person make? Imagine the…

Help secure TOC’s future

“I approached Teo Chee Hean. He was shaking hands with other supporters,…