Manpower Minister Josephine Teo has sent letters of demand to two people on Wednesday (20 May) to withdraw statements made about her and her husband — which are said to be defamatory.
The legal letters were sent to civil rights activist Jolovan Wham and another person by the name Donald Liew through the Minister’s lawyers.
Ms Teo explained that the statements, which highlighted about the development of quarantine centres for COVID-19 patients at Singapore Expo Convention and Exhibition Centre by Surbana Jurong, were “untrue, scurrilous and completely baseless”.
Singapore Expo is one of the few care centres created to house patients with early symptoms of COVID-19 as well as those who are recovering from the virus. All 10 halls in this premise has be transformed into a well-equipped care unit with a total capacity of 8,000 beds.
In the statement issued via her lawyers, Ms Teo said: “On these projects, Surbana Jurong dealt directly with the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Ministry of National Development (MND).”
She added, “Neither my spouse not I have any involvement with the commissioning of these projects or the monetary transactions.”
Ms Teo also stated that she will not proceed further on the matter if the allegations are retracted and an apology is given.
“I understand that I am legally entitled to substantial damages for these serious and baseless allegations. However, I do not intend to pursue the matter further, or to claim damages, if the allegations are publicly withdrawn, and apologies given,” she said.
She continued, “This has been made clear in my lawyers’ letters. The letters also require the two persons to make a donation of S$1,000 each to the Migrant Workers’ Assistance Fund.”
Following this, on Wednesday, Facebook user Donald Liew has apologised to Ms Teo for falsely accusing her and her husband for corruption.
He said in a Facebook post that he “apologies unreservedly” to the Minister and admitted that “these allegations are false and completely without foundation”.
However, Mr Wham has not come forward with any statement at the time of writing.

Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Bonus for ministers, peanuts for most?

by Leong Sze Hian I refer to the report “Budget 2011: Higher…

港发起“万人接机” 外交部吁请国人预留充裕时间前往机场

香港反对修订逃犯条例的争议持续,当地有市民发起明日(9日)至下周日(11日),一连三日“万人接机”集会,继续敦促政府响应“五大诉求”,以及停止暴力打压示威游行。 我国外交部吁请国人预留充裕时间前往机场,并预先查阅各航班的最新情况。 文告呼吁国人要随时保持警惕,留意当地动态和听从有关当局的指令,并表示接下来仍会有大型的示威活动,尽管均以和平的方式进行,但仍提醒国人保持联系畅通。 文告续说,目前身在香港的国人可前往外交部网站https://eregister.mfa.gov.sg/登记,让外交部可在紧急时刻与你联系。 示威延伸至机场,该活动未申请不反对通知书,可能涉违法 7月26日网民发起“和你飞”示威活动,多达1万5千人参加的机场集会大部分穿黑衣人士在接机大堂静坐,又不时高呼“香港人加油” 口号,又向外国旅客派发单张解释香港局势,惟期间发生零星冲突。 这次“万人接机”可说是“和你飞”的延续。 根据《端传媒》报道,网民强调该次活动“和平、理性、非暴力”,方式为“自由活动,不冲击、不破坏、不入禁区”,采取此前获得广泛认可的“Be water”方式,即不阻碍交通。 与以往集会不同,该次活动没有向警方申请不反对通知书。 警方在记者会上表示,活动需要通知警方,否则可能违法。…

新加坡男子涉运10公斤迷幻药 在柬越边境落网

一名我国男子被指涉嫌从柬埔寨运载10公斤迷幻药进入越南,被越南执法人员逮捕,可能面对死刑。 根据越南网络媒体报导,39岁的我国公民佘伟汉(Cher Wei Han,音译)涉嫌和一名36岁的越南男子,于上个月29日,企图运载10公斤的安非他命迷幻药进入云南,在柬越边界的西宁省(Tay Ninh)被逮捕。 据报道,两人当时乘着一辆本田轿车进入越南,但是他们的汽车行迹可疑,于是遭越南边界的执法人员下令下车。 执法人员在车上搜出一包包装有冰毒的包裹,且在佘伟汉的身上搜出3000美元(约4061新元),立即将两人扣留,并且充公他们的车辆和车内所有物件,包括冰毒。 两人被查问时透露,他们原本要将车上的俗称冰毒的安非他命迷幻药送到胡志明市,已进行出售。越南警方已经展开调查。 或面对死刑 根据越南法律,被判走私超过600克海洛因,或超过2.5公斤甲基安非他命的罪犯,将被判处死刑。 一旦涉嫌运毒的罪名成立,我国男子及其同伙都有可能面对死刑。

《海时》读者来函具诽谤性指控 遭本社总编要求撤文

今日,《网络公民》总编许渊臣在个人脸书分享,本地英语媒体《海峡时报》刊载一则读者来函,不过内容“包含诽谤性指控”,被前者要求撤文。 许渊臣在昨日致函新加坡报业控股编辑,要求他们撤下有关文章并确保不再重犯。据了解,《海时》已撤下有关文章。 不过,许渊臣表示他并无意要求对方道歉或索偿,他只希望看到对方“把事做对”。他感叹,近期许多针对《网络公民》的含沙射影,导致群众对本社持有不实的看法。 然而,他不怪有关文章作者持有自己的意见,惟批评《海时》既然声称自己是对抗“假新闻的最佳抗生素”,理应对于文章是否包含虚假信息有更好的理解。 有关文章是在上月29日刊载在《海时》的论坛,呼应此前律政暨内政部长尚穆根,指新加坡有必要立法以应对外国干预或影响本地政策或舆论。 据报导,尚穆根曾指出我国或许也得考虑如何限制外国人参与领导特定组织,这些组织都是密切参与我国政治的。“这个做法与我们限制外国人参与倡导议题公共集会和游行等的立场一致。” 他也认为,现今互联网的普及和覆盖面,也使得干预途径影响更为深远。 除了抨击学者覃炳鑫与自由新闻工作者韩俐颖,曾联名申请成立公司,但使用外国资金在新加坡推动民主和人权等课题;尚穆根点名本社聘用外国人撰写有关新加坡政治的负面文章。 不过,许渊臣此前已经回应,作为总编他必须指导和审核批准这些文章,自己也必须对通讯及新闻部负责。 对于雇用外籍编采人员的说法,他回应我国法律并未阻止我们聘雇外籍雇员,再者,《网络公民》从未接受任何外国款项。“所以律政部长是在吠什么?” 日前许渊臣也上载一张照片,清楚展示本社的作业方式。对于有关被指冒犯总理的文章,对于文章导向、如何撰写和角度,都由总编亲自给予指示,茹巴并没有在指示以外添加其他内容,“所以不管他是马来西亚人、新加坡人、印度人等,有差别吗?” “如同我此前对尚穆根的答复,这很明显是是有组织的行动抹黑本社信誉,令人震惊的是,律政部长竟然复述那些亲行动党粉丝专页和恶搞网站,在过去几周以来作出的指控。”