Photo by Lectress Pat

The police have traced a number of the individuals who gathered around the Robertson Quay area amid the circuit breaker period, and these individuals are non-Singaporeans, said the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Masagos Zulkifli on Monday (18 May).
Earlier on 16 May, Facebook user Lectress Pat posted a series of photos showing crowds of people gathering around Robertson Quay, noting that no enforcer was seen patrolling the area when the photos were being taken at around 6.25pm.
Some individuals were spotted not wearing a face mask in the photos, while others were seen sitting near to each other without social distancing. The photos have since gone viral on social media.
Following that, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) on 17 May stated that it has ordered the restaurants at Robertson Quay to cease the sale of takeaway alcohol immediately.
In response to the incident, Mr Masagos confirmed in a Facebook post on 18 May to affirm that the URA officers have been patrolling the area. He noted that a number of the individuals who gathered in the area have been traced by the police.
“These persons are non-Singaporeans, and are currently under police investigation,” he wrote.
Mr Masagos stated that some of the restaurants were selling takeaway alcohol, which had led to individuals gathering around the premises there.
He reassured the public that the URA will continue to monitor the area with the police officers to ensure compliance by operators and individuals.
“Enforcement action will be taken against business operators and individuals found to be in breach of safe distancing measures,” Mr Masagos asserted.
Furthermore, Mr Masagos reiterated that the “circuit breaker can only work when everybody plays their part”. He urged everyone to abide by “both the letter and spirit of the law to contain the COVID-19 virus”.
“If you see any offenders, please don’t just take photos for a posting. Report it through the #OneService app with specific details and photos,” he said, adding that Singapore is seeing progress made during the circuit breaker.

Netizens asked why the “double standard” for non-Singaporeans who breached the circuit breaker measures

Although Mr Masagos had stated that the police have tracked down the individuals who gathered at Robertson Quay and that they are non-Singaporeans, no clarification was given on whether these individuals have faced any punishments.
This has led many netizens to question why foreigners get “double standard” treatment by the authorities as compared to migrant workers or Singaporeans who failed to comply with the safe distancing measures.








One netizen brought up about the case of a Singaporean man who was sentenced to a six-week jail term after breaching the stay-home notice to eat bah kut teh, noting that the Government should act fairly and “not allow a dual-class treatment”.

One more netizen brought up the case of 24 migrant workers who had their work passes revoked for “eating, drinking and gathering in groups”. He asked why were the foreigners at Robertson Quay treated differently.

Another netizen noted that some migrant workers at Tuas View dormitory were fined and deported home after they were found gathering and drinking in public. He pointed out that the Government should not place two different rules for work permit holders and employment pass holders.

Netizens say OneService app is not effective, which explains why people rather post photos on social media

Mr Masagos urged people to report offenders through the OneService app, instead of taking photos and posting them on social media. But many netizens who have used the app complained that the app is not effective.
One netizen wrote that he spotted a group of retirees not wearing mask properly and were loitering around his neighborhood. He reported the case via the OneService app, but was told to call the police instead. He claimed that no action was being taken even after he had called the police, and the group is still meeting almost everyday.

Another netizen wrote that people have been reporting on the OneService app for weeks about crowds of people gathering around at Robertson Quay but no action was taken until the photos became viral on social media. This explains why people are posting such photos on social media rather than reporting the cases via the app.
She added that congregating cases at East Coast Park, Holland Village, Bukit Timah, and other places have also been reported via the app but no action was taken.

A netizen, who goes by the name Leon Yong, commented that the OneService app is not effective. He reported a case via the app about a cook in a coffee shop who refused to wear a mask when cooking, but no action was taken.

Netizens asked why offenders at Robertson Quay under investigation while offenders at Heartland were fined straightaway

Meanwhile, some netizens raised a question on Hardwarezone forum as to why the individuals who flouted the circuit breaker measures at Heartland area were immediately fined while the offenders at Robertson Quay are still under investigation.


Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

不曾与外籍人士竞争过工作 “纸将军”有资格谈不公雇佣现象?

犹记得今年初,工人党党魁毕丹星在国会询问,从2015至2018年,新加坡公民和永久居民就业率的对比。他也提及通常政府把“本地人”都涵括公民和永久居民。 对此,贸工部长陈振声直言:“我可以给你数据,但这么问背后意义又是什么?” 如今他应该知道其意义所在,有关不公平雇佣现象,和外国人在部分企业中占据优势的争议愈发增加,甚至连全国职工总会的秘书长黄志明也已警觉而现身表态,指政府需要缩紧就业准证(Employment Pass)政策。 讽刺的是,陈振声和黄志明都不曾与任何外国人竞争过任何工作,他们在军旅稳健建功勋,但他们是否能够感同身受,经历新加坡劳工的担忧和恐惧,而且这些焦虑长期笼罩着工友们的生活? 陈振声也在表示,必须为新加坡疫情后的发展规划新的方向。但除了帮助企业适应以外,我们也必须直面体制的问题,包括是否还要继续委派前将领们,打理国家经济?这么做仍凑效,或已不合时宜? 是什么让前将领自居国家领导职务? 为何部队俨然成了未来国家高级领导的重大培育平台?这是需要重新思考并彻底进行改革。 不少人民行动党的成员都有军旅背景,其中包括政务部长陈国明和严晓芳,还有精英阶层的高级政治官员,均未面对过与外籍人士的就业竞争。 除了内阁以外,数十年来,这些将领们一直渗透到人民的生活中,包括人民协会、全国职工总会、行政机构甚至是淡马锡控股等相关组织。 其中一个典型的例子即为前将军伍逸松,在他从部队退役后,加入淡马锡控股,随后还成为东方海皇(Neptune Orient…

“民选议员提出项目要败选者批准” 余振忠:对民主的何等荒谬和嘲弄

“民选国会议员提出的社区项目,却要由败选候选人批准,这对于我们的民主是何等荒谬和嘲弄。拖延或无视追问只为耍手段,也令那些需要使用这些设施的居民不便。” 工人党议员毕丹星和阿裕尼集选区基层组织顾问蔡荣良,此前为了选区内无障碍斜坡工程项目,隔空骂战。如今工人党前非选区议员余振忠,也加入战围,抨击受人民委托的选区议员提出项目,还要败选候选人批准,实为“荒谬”和对民主的嘲弄。 余振忠回忆,即便自己未投身政治前,就已对这种为了选票而做翻新的举动感到恼火,甚至还曾为此写信到《海峡时报》论坛力陈此弊端。项目动用的是纳税人的钱,但这种机制就形同要挟居民,迫使他们投票给执政党。 他强调,新加坡应该是属于新加坡人的,而不是人民行动党,即便和许多国人一样,他感谢开国先贤们对良好经济发展的贡献,但不代表人民认同,以不民主的手段来巩固自身权力。 而人民如果选择让行动党继续执政,也应该是基于他们自发的选择,而不是因为本身的福祉被要挟。 2011年至2015年余振忠担任非选区议员,他很清楚自己没有权限动用如切单选区的人民协会或设施,也肯定没办法像蔡荣良那样,有权力审批社区项目。 他提及两周前,《海时》编辑蔡美芬提醒,行动党如过于蛮横恐怕会招致反弹。这番话可能是对第四代领导,对付本地剧作家异议的手段有微词。但同样的道理也适用在上述批准社区项目的机制问题,以及其他过度行使政治霸权而排除人民的事项。 “新加坡应该属于新加坡人的,不是任何政党。我们不应该容许这种霸权,透过不合理和不民主的手段来要挟新加坡人。” 毕丹星称提出体制问题 此前,工人党阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星,抱怨选区内“一个简单、数月就可完工的无障碍斜坡,搞到要几年才完成。有多少乐龄人士、行动不便人士或康复者,无法从这类设施受益?” 他质疑行动党如何决定人民协会在反对党选区运作?也抱怨反对党议员提出的提案,往往都被人协忽略。 对此,蔡荣良,在本月19日发文反驳,表示对毕丹星对于上述无障碍斜坡项目发表不实言论“感遗憾”,也质疑后者借此事转移对工人党市镇会官司的注意。他也反驳毕丹星指因为是反对党的提案所以延迟的说法。…

Catherine Lim’s letter to parents on CSE programme

“In the foreseeable future, as more homosexuals come out into the open, the last vestiges of the old stigma against homosexuality will disappear altogether.”

坐拥95亿元储备金 读者:国大欠人民一个解释

上月28日,本地媒体揭发新加坡国立大学坐拥95亿储备金,在去年3月底结束的财政年度中,收到2亿2700万元捐款,并赚取6亿200元的投资收入,成为我国最成功的筹款机构。 报导引起民间关注,此前亦有民众质疑,大学如果已拥有大量储备金,不明白大学还需要捐款者捐献的原因。“慈善捐款的饼就这么大,如果拿下一大块,就意味着留给其他慈善机构的就不多了。到底捐款和储备金,要多少才算足够?” 旅居台湾的博客鄞义林也曾评述,政府资助这些公共大学,但新加坡本地学府也是征收最贵学费的地区之一。 “换言之,国人已经为教育缴纳足够的税赋,然而行动党政府还要人民承担更多学费(全球第五贵),这些学府赚有盈余,反观不少毕业生毕业后需面对负债,这公平么?” 对于这些质疑声音,此前国大发言人曾解释,大学利用储备金赚取投资收入,用于资助不同的运作费,如奖学金、支持研究和推广企业化;大学也需要继续筹款让储备金处于健康水平,才能加强长期的财务可持续性。 在本月22日,再有另一读者陈文发(译音)在《海时》撰文,再度质疑国大坐拥的巨额储备金,理应用来应对学费增长的问题;也认为国大欠人民一个解释,究竟累积95亿元储备金要作何用? 他指出,一般非政府组织的标准是累积两年的储备,但国大的储备难道没有限制?他也吁请国大应暂停募款,直至其储备降至一定数额位置。 对此,国大高级副教务长陈清贤教授特别在《海时》论坛答复陈文发的质问,解释截至去年3月31日财年,95亿储备金的架构: 其中有59亿元是捐赠基金(Endowed funds) 特定用途的非捐赠金捐献约八亿元 累计运营盈余28亿元(占30巴仙)…