The Ministry of Health (MOH) has confirmed that the Health Promotion Board will be hiring swabbers and swabbing assistants on short-term contracts to facilitate in a wider COVID-19 swab testing effort.
Meanwhile, it was reported that swab assistants will be paid S$3,400, while swabbers will be paid S$3,800 per month. With the amount of pay, the job does not require any experience in healthcare.
Following the announcement of this particular vacancy for a short-term employment, an uproar broke out when a nurse shared her salary on social media, revealing a huge discrepancy between an inexperienced part-time swabber and a full-time healthcare professional.
Sim Hong Yu noted that the average salary for nursing graduates is S$1,900, adding that the salary increment would not reach S$3,800 even after five to six years of working.
“I do understand and accept that there’s higher risks involved in this application and also appreciate those who stepped forward to do this. However I really want to highlight the under carpet issue of salary differences,” she wrote.
In regards to this issue, Temasek Holdings CEO Ho Ching took to her Facebook on Sunday (17 May) to pen her thoughts.
Targeting the people who thinks their pay is unfairly lower than the swabbers, she asserted that they should “stop whining” and go volunteer to be trained to do the COVID-19 swabbing.

“For anyone who think their pay is unfairly lower than the swabbers, stop whining and go volunteer to be trained to do the swabbing.”

Mdm Ho explained that the volunteers are “being trained” for all sorts of paid jobs. She listed a range of jobs such as administration, swabbers, cleaners, patient services, logistics, drivers, as well as the front line workers in the red zones.
She also said that the Government does not take the volunteers for granted, adding that it pays them “properly”, while not forgetting to admit that the swabbers got a higher salary as compared to “easier and safer” jobs.
Mdm Ho went on to suggest that the volunteers are taught to keep themselves safe for the benefit of everyone, emphasising that there are “no two ways about it”.

Yes, we teach them to keep safe, not just for their own safety, but also for the safety of their team, their families, their patients and potential cases. No two ways about it.”

Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

悼林福寿逝世八周年,铭记冷藏行动下的受害者

今日(6月4日)是60年代左派领导者,已故林福寿医生逝世八周年(生于1931年2月21日,逝于2012年6月4日)。他曾在已故建国总理李光耀政府期间,被拘留近20载。 功能八号氏族会今日在脸书专页贴文,悼念林福寿过去为新加坡作出的贡献和牺牲。与此同时,也勿忘那些在1963年2月2日,冷藏行动下的被迫害者。 当时政府号称冷藏行动为最大宗的国家安全行动。多达133人,依“维护公共安全条例”(PPSO)下, 在凌晨时分被逮捕。包括林福寿、工会工作人员、专家、教育工作者以及学生领袖,进行拘留并在未经审判下长时间监禁他们。 然而,在许多新闻报导中,都没有提及任何颠覆性文件或任何武器被扣押。“我们可以肯定地说,被捕者没有任何武器或颠覆性文件。他们甚至没有试图逃脱或抵抗逮捕。政府怎么能认为他们很危险必须被对付?” 社阵中委林福寿,得到来自吉隆坡友人预警有关警方的突袭行动,但他仍留在家里,也未拒捕。傅树介医生等人亦是如此。如果他们真的是颠覆或恐怖份子,难道不早就试图逃之夭夭? 人民行动党声称,被捕者是颠覆性、不忠的新加坡人,这是荒唐可笑的。当时有武器在手的都是辜加兵和参与行动的警察。每个被捕者都动用了10位武装人员。1963年使用的震慑策略,仍沿用至今。 由于政府没有任何针对被捕者的颠覆证据,也没有人受到审判。 在《内安法令》下,决策者完全可以滥用权力。可以无限期拘留林福寿等政治对手,甚至可以拘留一世。 在拘留的第十年,他被开出条件,若接受就能获释,但他拒绝接受李光耀的要求。1972年3月18日,林福寿医生透过妻子陈宗孟医生发出声明,显示他拒绝“给脸”李光耀,林福寿钢铁般的意志,导致他必须面对另外10年监禁的代价。 功能八号氏族会指出,容许《内安法令》存在的危险在于,若缺乏政府更迭和有力的反对党,那么像林福寿那样的拘留者很可能就这么被遗忘、无限期地被关在监狱。难道我们要继续任由政府滥用此恶法? 林福寿去世前一周,他还曾发简讯给光谱行动25周年纪念主办方,…

Disciplinary action taken against officers for escape

Wong Kan Seng informs Parliament that eight officers have been disciplined for Mas Selamat’s escape.

South Korea ruling party heading for majority, say exit polls

South Korea’s left-leaning ruling Democratic party was heading towards a parliamentary majority…

榜鹅凶杀案 20岁嫌犯落网

5月10日,榜鹅一带,苏芒巷第277A座组屋对面巴士站,一名38岁华裔男子遇袭,遭凶徒猛刺多刀后倒地。救护人员赶到现场将男子送往医院,但抢救不果,在医院逝世。 据警方今日傍晚(16日)在脸书更新贴文,警方今日凌晨2时45分,逮捕一名20岁嫌犯,初步调查凶嫌不认识死者,相信是单独犯案,案件仍在调查中。 嫌犯将在明日,在刑事法典第302(1)条文的谋杀罪名下被提控。