A variety of raw beef parts displayed in shop counter

by Andrew Leeson
China suspended imports from four major Australian beef suppliers Tuesday, just weeks after Beijing’s ambassador warned of a consumer boycott in retaliation for Canberra’s push to probe the origins of the coronavirus.
Analysts said the move raised concerns of a possible standoff between Australia and its most important trading partner that could spill over into other crucial sectors as it struggles to navigate the disease-induced economic crisis.
Federal Trade Minister Simon Birmingham said shipments of meat from four abattoirs had been suspended over “minor technical” breaches related to Chinese health and labelling certificate requirements.
“We are concerned that the suspensions appear to be based on highly technical issues, which in some cases date back more than a year,” he added.
“We will work with industry and authorities in both Australia and China to seek to find a solution that allows these businesses to resume their normal operations as soon as possible.”
The four abattoirs account for around 35 percent of Australia’s beef exports to China in a trade worth about Aus$1.7 billion (US$1.1 billion), according to national broadcaster ABC.
Beijing has also flagged major tariffs on Australian barley over allegations it is dumping the grain in China — selling it for less than it costs to produce. The Australian Financial Review cited confidential documents as saying Beijing is considering duties of 73.6 percent.
Tensions between the two have increased since Australia started calling for an independent investigation into the origin of the coronavirus outbreak, which began in China before spreading around the world, killing more than 280,000, infecting millions and shattering the global economy.

Fears for other sectors

The calls have drawn threats from Beijing, with ambassador Cheng Jingye calling them “dangerous”.
In an interview with the Australian Financial Review last month, he said: “The Chinese public is frustrated, dismayed and disappointed with what Australia is doing now.
“If the mood is going from bad to worse, people would think ‘why should we go to such a country that is not so friendly to China?’ The tourists may have second thoughts.”
He added: “It is up to the people to decide. Maybe the ordinary people will say ‘Why should we drink Australian wine? Eat Australian beef?'”
Cheng also threatened the flow of Chinese students to Australian universities, a key source of revenue that is already under threat from pandemic travel restrictions.
But speaking in Canberra, Birmingham said the government was treating the trade issues as unrelated to discussions around a virus probe.
“It’s in no way related… to the export arrangements for Australian beef or for Australian barley or for anything else,” he said.
“We certainly don’t see any relationship, and we would expect that no other counterpart country should see a relationship between those factors either.”
The latest trade friction hit investor confidence in Australia with the benchmark ASX200 down 1.1 per cent, or 58.2 points, to 5403.0 at the close, while the broader All Ordinaries dropped 1.11 percent, or 61.80 points, to 5,497.30.
Shares in Australian Agriculture Company, one of the country’s largest beef exporters, fell 3.7 percent.
The two countries were already at loggerheads after Australia hit China with huge anti-dumping levies on several products including aluminium and steel.
Beijing has also been riled by a decision to ban controversial telecoms giant Huawei from building Australia’s 5G network.
And there are fears of a further escalation of the standoff and its impact on their two-way trade, which is about Aus$235 billion.
“The risk is, of course, that this broadens out to more critical areas such as iron ore, coal, education, LNG, etcetera,” said AxiCorp’s Stephen Innes.
He added: “But if it stays at beef and barley, then economically, it shouldn’t matter much for Australia.”
– AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PM Anwar could propel human rights at the center of a global conversation

The upcoming attendance of Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar at the 75th anniversary commemoration of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR75) could have important symbolic implications for promoting human rights in Southeast Asia and beyond. While human rights are not currently established as a pillar of the strategic framework guiding the work of the Anwar government, they are considered key cross-cutting elements at its foundations. The Prime Minister, who has long been involved in promoting an enlightened version of Islam that embraces human rights and human dignity, now has the opportunity to launch a new global agenda entitled “Human Rights for Responsive Good Governance and Sustainable Development”. This initiative could encourage other middle and developing nations to commit to upholding their human rights commitments and ensure that human rights are central to any new vision for the ASEAN bloc.

Dutch health minister leading COVID-19 virus fight resigns due to exhaustion

Dutch Medical Care Minister Bruno Bruins, who is leading the Dutch government…

Indonesia issues warning of possible haze over the Strait of Malacca

JAKARTA – Indonesia has warned on Friday (Aug 19) that haze from…

Taliban in control of Afghanistan, panic in Kabul

The Taliban were in control of Afghanistan on Monday after President Ashraf…