In Jan this year when the coronavirus outbreak started to unfold, a member of the public Dr Kho Kwang Po wrote to ST Forum wanting to educate the public on the importance of wearing masks.
However, at the time, the government was of the opinion that people should only wear masks if they are ill. They should not be wearing any masks if they are well.
Dr Kho’s letter was published under ‘Forum: Excerpts from readers’ letters‘ in a short paragraph on 24 Jan:

WEAR MASKS TO FIGHT VIRUS
Now that the potentially fatal Wuhan virus is spreading, it is a good time to educate the public to wear a mask when they have a cough to prevent the spread of viruses.
This should be strictly enforced on all forms of transport, especially airlines.
The virus is spread by droplets, so masks will reduce its transmission.
Healthcare personnel who are constantly exposed to risks should definitely do this.
Kho Kwang Po (Dr)

Reading the ST Forum letter from Dr Kho would have given the impression to readers that he supported the government’s call to wear masks only when one is ill, and if one is well, he should not be wearing any masks.
Dr Kho: ST edited my letter to make it look like I supported the ‘no mask if not sick’ advice
Today (10 May), Dr Kho broke his silence revealing on his Facebook page for the first time that actually Straits Times edited out a crucial sentence which altered the main point of his letter.
As far back as Jan, Dr Kho was actually advocating that people should wear masks regardless if one is ill or not.
“Straits Times forum has the bad habit of editing letters to reflect or confirm their own or govt’s stance on various issues… like mask usage,” Dr Kho lamented.
“They edited my letter to make it look like I supported the ‘no mask if not sick’ advice of the govt. This is completely deplorable and irresponsible.”
Dr Kho then went on to say that Straits Times actually deleted the following important sentence from his letter:

“Those who do not wish to be infected should don N95 masks especially in crowded confined areas”

“(This) was deleted to make it appear I agreed with the govt’s disastrous no mask advice supported by Dr Leong Hoe Nam, Prof Dale Fisher and MOH,” Dr Kho added.
Another Facebook user replied to Dr Kho, “Why bother to write. I have given up long ago. No longer interested in anything here. Waiting to live out my life elsewhere.”

ST Editors appointed by government
In 2011, notes written by US Embassy staff in Singapore were leaked online via Wikileak. In one of the documents, it recorded conversations between then ST US Bureau Chief Chua Chin Hon with the US Embassy staff.
Chua lamented that the ST editors have all been groomed as pro-government supporters and are careful to ensure that reporting of local events adheres closely to the official line. He said that none of them has the courage to publish any stories critical of the government.
Chua also revealed that the Singapore government has an established track record of using the press, the ST in particular, to shape public opinion. He noted how the government intends to push a certain policy is often foreshadowed by extensive media coverage (published before the official policy announcements).
As an example, he pointed to the government’s decision to assist retirees who lost investments in “mini-bonds” following the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008. That official decision to help the retirees was announced after a spate of media coverage casting the retirees’ plight in sympathetic terms, before the government came to the “rescue”.
Given Chua’s testimony, it’s not difficult to understand why Straits Times would want to edit a reader’s letter in support of government’s call not to wear masks if one is well, even though that was not the intention of the reader.

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dorm operator who locked up migrant workers should be given much more than a stern warning

The world’s eyes are on Singapore as the country’s cases of coronavirus…

巴蒂回乡圆梦有望啦! 情义之家成功筹获2.8万元

成功获改判无罪的前女佣巴蒂·莉雅妮(Parti Liyani),为了能让她返回印尼并开餐馆维持家计,客工援助组织情义之家(HOME)设立网上筹款活动,成功在一天内收到超过2万8000元的善款。 46岁的印尼籍前女佣,曾在樟宜机场集团主席廖文良家中帮佣近九年,于2016年10月28日被开除后,遭前雇主父子报警指控偷走逾五万元的财物。而巴蒂在被开除当天就返回印尼,后因廖家父子的指控,于2016年12月2日回到我国时被逮捕。 为了配合调查,巴蒂自2016年12月就滞留在本地,但因无法工作,她就一直居住在由情义之家所经营的收容所内,依靠该组织的援助至今已将近四年。 案件终于在上周五(9月4日),由高庭推翻国家法院的判决,改判巴蒂无罪。巴蒂受访时表示,她被逮捕至今,都不敢告诉母亲真实情况,因为不想让母亲担心。 情义之家在昨日(9月6日)通过筹款网站Giving.sg,为巴蒂设立筹款活动,希望能够帮助巴蒂早日回乡,展开新生并完成设立餐馆的梦想。 对于判决,情义之家在声明中指出,在接受调查、审判和上诉过程中都一路陪伴着巴蒂,当局很高兴巴蒂取得司法胜利,定罪完全被推翻。“巴蒂在过去四年都无法工作赚取收入,而您的捐款将能够帮助到她,让她重建生活并实现自己的梦想。” 此外,情义之家也感叹,客工在面对指控时遭遇不公对待。 声明中,情义之家指出,涉案的客工无法得知调查需要多长时间,且不被允许工作也不能离境。有些无辜的客工就是因此而选择认罪,因为服刑的时间可能会比法庭程序所需的时间来的短。 该组织表示,在律法前面应该人人平等,不该因为工作准证级别或国籍而有所变动,更应该让他们获得律师代表的机会。 该组织放眼筹获2万8000元,而在短短一天内,有关的金额已达标,甚至超出了。筹款活动已截止,该组织成功为巴蒂筹获2万8560元。

Four additional cases of COVID-19 infection confirmed by MOH; All cases traceable

As of 18 February 2020, 12 pm, the Ministry of Health (MOH)…

妇女协会冀立法对付职场歧视 惟雇联辩称恐弊多于利

新加坡妇女行动与研究协会(AWARE)高级执行人员Mamta Melwani,上周在《今日报》发表文章,认为有必要立法遏止职场歧视的现象,确保雇主问责。 不过,全国雇主联合会(SNEF)执行董事长沈锦源,却认为“仅少数雇主”有歧视性的雇佣行为,若立法管制恐弊多于利。“采用法律方法解决工作场所问题,往往会导致职场关系僵化或恶化,对雇主和雇员都没好处。”(Taking a legalistic approach to resolving workplace issues often results…