On Wednesday evening (6 May), Mr S. Iswaran, the Minister for Communications and Information declared the Singapore States Times’ (SST) and Alex Tan’s Facebook pages Declared Online Locations (DOL) under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA).
The Declarations will come into effect on 7 May 2020.
Under the Declarations, the SST’s and Tan’s Facebook pages are required to carry a notice stating that they have been declared DOLs.
With the notice, visitors to both Facebook pages will be warned that the pages have a history of communicating falsehoods. The Declaration will also make it an offence for both SST and Tan to derive benefit from operating the Facebook pages, and prohibit the provision of financial support to them for the purposes of supporting, helping or promoting the communication of falsehoods.
As stated in the POFMA Office’s statement, SST’s and Tan’s Facebook pages have repeatedly communicated numerous falsehoods, of which at least three on each page were the subject of POFMA Directions from November 2019 to-date.
The POFMA office further states that SST and Tan have refused to comply with any of the Directions issued to them. It added that both Facebook pages have recently communicated falsehoods regarding the COVID-19 virus situation in Singapore.
Both Facebook pages are linked to other websites that are operated by Tan, which derive monetary benefits from these falsehoods at the expense of Singaporeans and the society.
This is also the second time that Facebook pages operated by Tan have been declared as DOLs
Under POFMA, a person who, whether in or outside Singapore, solicits, receives or agrees to receive any financial or other material benefit as an inducement or reward for operating a declared online location shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction — in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $40,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years or to both; or in any other case, to a fine not exceeding $500,000.
The same penalty will be applied for a person who supports, helps or promotes the communication of false statements of fact in Singapore on a declared online location.

Both pages were issued a Correction Direction on 5 May

On 4 May, SST published a Facebook post stating that “Education Minister Ong Ye Kung is responsible for numerous infections in schools after he refused to close down the schools. The schools were only closed on April 3rd, but at least 50 students and teachers were already infected.”
This post was also shared by Tan on his Facebook page.
On 5 May, POFMA issued two correction directions to the STT Facebook page and Tan for communicating a falsehood published by Singapore States Times on COVID-19 cases in schools, which imply that at least 50 students and teachers had become infected with COVID-19 by 3 April 2020 as a result of transmission in schools.
The POFMA office noted that as of 3 April, 69 students and staff in MOE schools, including the Institutes of Higher Learning (IHLs), were reported to have been infected with COVID-19. Based on contact tracing and investigations by MOH, all the cases (except for 3 which are still unlinked) were attributed to transmission via overseas travel, within households, social settings, and a non-school workplace (for a part-time student).
POFMA office states that this meant that none of the 69 infections were traced back to MOE schools, including the IHLs.
The two Facebook posts are no longer viewable as of the publication of this article.

Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Foreign scholars: Missing statistics?

~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the article “Foreign scholars closely…

Humble Ministers’ Abode or Palatial Retreat? A Closer Look at the Ministers’ Black-and-White Houses

The grandeur of the estates occupied by Singapore’s Cabinet Ministers K Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan, the Singapore Land Authority’s role in its maintenance and upgrades, and extensive tree clearance starkly contrast with the humble image projected by SLA’s latest TikTok videos and Facebook comments for these black-and-white houses. Far from being a humble abode, 26 Ridout Road, previously occupied by Biscuit Baron, Rajan Pillai and now Minister K Shanmugam was once characterized in a 1995 New Paper report as a veritable palace.

PUB: Throwing money down the drain

~ By Phillip Ang ~ I understand PUB's predicament as a result of inclement…

前学者:家长式作风、社会工程和威权主义,乃精英化政策之表征

李光耀公共政策研究院前副院长刘浩典教授,指出新加坡的精英主义,通常不是因为“成功新加坡人缺乏同情心”,或社会开支不足,反之,更多是源于“非常精英化”的政府政策和决策过程。 针对学者李秀萍和前政府投资公司经济师杨南强,提及现有对低收入群体支援不足、小贩面对压力的情况,刘浩典于上周五再次撰文,提醒精英化的政府政策,透过三大方面展现: 其一,家长式作风,认为所有人只要遵守新加坡精英们的设想去做,社会就会变得美好。 二,社会工程:自以为政府可以打造出精英们所设想的社会。 三,威权主义:极度怀疑公民社会、独立媒体或任何可能挑战政府权威和专业的非政府行动主义者。 倨傲的精英和复杂社会情势极不搭调 他直言,上述信念不仅非常精英且倨傲,甚至和越发复杂的社会情势极不搭调。 “随着社会问题越发复杂,就没有绝对清晰的解决方案。正确的做法,应该是更加谨慎、时常检视自身是否存在偏见、决策上也不宜过早妄下定论。” 讽刺的是,近年来的局势发展恰恰相反:对于越发复杂的情境,人民行动党政府却越发坚持其核心理念,从当前对最低薪资制的论战中,就可见一斑。 他补充,政府显而易见的精英主义,也体现在把人民当作实现他们宏伟愿景的工具,例如小贩们面对的处境就是最佳例子。 小贩政策偏离小贩实际需求 “政府谈的都不是小贩们真正需要的东西。小贩们只是政府为了实现某些目的的手段:负担得起的小贩美食、“充满活力”的小贩中心,提升小贩生产力、打造只会国家和申遗等等。”…