With the development of a mobile app like TraceTogether, it is expected that Singaporeans would cooperate with the Government to aid in contact tracing amid the COVID-19 outbreak.
However, this app has only been downloaded by about 17 per cent of the Singaporean population since its launch in March. TraceTogether uses Bluetooth signal between phones to detect other TraceTogether uses in close proximity, suggesting a great voluntary effort in making this plan work.

Experts’ opinions on TraceTogether

The chairman of the Government Parliamentary Committee for Health, Chia Shi-Lu, stated that the app should be made mandatory for all residents to ease contact tracing efforts. The conventional way of contact tracing is deemed labour-intensive and time-consuming.
Considering how contact tracing is crucial to combat the spread of the coronavirus, Mr Chia noticed that the result of the app download was rather “disappointing”.

“Contact tracing is one of the most important pillars to manage any outbreak, and leveraging on technology can make things easier. But the voluntary uptakes have so far been disappointing.”

He had also suggested that the authorities can opt to make the download of the tracing app automatic in mobile devices.

“The authorities can look into making the download automatic in smartphones, where people can have an opt-out.”

Another idea given by an infectious disease specialist, Leong Hoe Nam, is that the authorities could also require people to show the app on their smartphones. This serves as a similar approach as the mandatory NRIC checks carried out at four popular wet markets in Singapore.
Mr Leong added that downloading the app should be seen as compulsory as donning a face mask when essential workers step out of their homes. Only widespread use will be able to ease the process of contact tracing if one comes in contact with an infected individual.

“At the least, all essential workers must download the app and see it as significant as wearing a mask when they step out of their homes.”
“If the app finds one such person who crossed paths with an infected person, the authorities can locate and quarantine him straight away to stop further transmission.”

The Tech Editor of the Straits Times, Irene Tham, thought that the app has not been able to “do what it was designed for”. And there’s only one reason that contributed to this, which is the citizens’ unwillingness to use the app.
Other than recognising that Singapore has thousands of closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras installed nationwide, Ms Tham worries that there is still a lacking of accurate logs of all interaction. She pointed out that people do forget who they meet and they do not have the contact details of the strangers they speak to.

Citizens’ concerns for privacy issues

According to The New Paper, the low download rate may associate with privacy concerns because the app collects mobile numbers and stores the numbers centrally for contact tracing.
A 26-year-old market analyst, Jon Fong, is hesitant to download the app because he didn’t want his locations to be tracked.
“I am quite ambivalent about the app and have no desire to have my whereabouts tracked. Even in circuit breaker mode, people still want to have a certain level of freedom,” explained Mr Fong.
A housewife told the press that she felt obligated to download the app seeing how there was a rise in unlinked COVID-19 cases in the community. She also revealed that initially, she was reluctant to use that app due to privacy concerns.

What TraceTogether clarified

On TraceTogether’s website, they clarified that the app does not collect data about the users’ GPS location as well as their WiFi or mobile network.

“TraceTogether uses Bluetooth to approximate your distance to other phones running the same app. We do not collect data about your GPS location. Neither do we collect data about your WiFi or mobile network.”

The website had also stated that the data of the phones near the user will not reveal personal identities. Instead, a Temporary ID will be generated and can only be decrypted by the Ministry of Health (MOH).

“When you are close to another phone running TraceTogether, both phones use Bluetooth to exchange a Temporary ID. This Temporary ID is generated by encrypting the User ID with a private key held by the Ministry of Health (MOH). It can only be decrypted by MOH, and does not reveal your identity or the other person’s identity.”

Not only that, but any user who is infected with the coronavirus also has the option to let the MOH access the data on TraceTogether.

“Data about phones near you is stored only on your phone. If a user gets infected with COVID-19, he/she has the option to give MOH access to his/her TraceTogether data.”

Law and Home Affairs Minister, K. Shanmugam, understood that people have their rights to their privacy, however, they will put other people’s safety and health at risk if they can’t be actively contact-traced.
“There are individual rights of privacy, but if you don’t take care and cannot actively contact trace, you are putting other people at risk. If you weigh all of this, I think it comes down on the side of contact tracing, probably with the kind of app that resides in your phone,” said Mr Shanmugam.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【防假消息法上诉】上诉庭保留判决 民主党辩护律师:举证责任应在部长一方

民主党脸书贴文和文章,被人力部援引防假消息法(POFMA)发出更正指示。就此该党已上诉至上诉庭,并于本月17日由五司审理。 这也是自防假消息法生效以来,本地最高法院首次受理相关上诉案件。以大法官梅达顺为首的五司,花了近六小时半,同时审理两宗与防假消息法有关的上诉。上诉庭保留判决,择日下判。 两宗上诉分别由民主党和《网络公民》提呈。控辩双方的争辩,主要围绕在谁应负担举证的责任? 民主党辩护律师:举证责任应在部长一方 民主党代表律师苏勒士奈尔( Suresh Nair)就争辩,举证的责任应在发出更正指示的部长一方,或是总检察署,来证明有关消息是假的。再者,内政部对民主党发出更正指示,要求该党贴出声明有关消息不实,却未阐述究竟民主党的消息,哪里不实? 总检察署代表,署理检控官 Kristy Tan则强调,举证责任应在发出消息的人身上,这并非过分繁重的负担,再者若无真凭实据,就不该发表可能影响公共利益的陈述。 去年12月14日,针对民主党的脸书贴文和文章,人力部援引防假消息法,对民主党发出要求更正指示。 人力部当时反驳,本地PMET的就业率自2015年实则逐步增长;且并没有出现本地PMET裁员增加的趋势。…

HSA reveals greater security lapse in blood bank database than originally found; data breach issue to be raised in Parliament on Monday

There was “more access” to the data of over 800,000 blood donors…

Complaint filed with SMC against council member

The High Court ruled last month (4 Sep) that the Singapore Medical…

Segment of 26th Golden Melody Awards censored for “offensive message”

Viewers of the “live” cable broadcast of Taiwan’s 26th Golden Melody Awards…