Photo: service.nestia.com

A net profit of S$29 million has been announced by supermarket operator Sheng Siong for its Q1 which ended 31 March.
Its net profit increased by 49.9 per cent from the previous year due to (1) revenue jump, (2) better gross margin, (3) higher other income, and (4) a less-than-proportional increase in operating expenses compared to the rise in revenue.
The supermarket operator’s revenue rose 30.7 per cent to S$328.7 million, driven primarily by the better-than-expected Chinese New Year sales and the impact from COVID-19 pandemic.
Compared to Q1 last year at 1.29 cents, earnings per share in Q1 were 1.91 cents. This time, no dividend was disclosed, similar to the period the previous year.
Nonetheless, employees, excluding directors, will receive an additional month of salary for their hard work throughout the period of increased demand in Q1, Sheng Siong stated with regards to its strong results in Q1.
When the Government responded to the pandemic by changing the colour alert of the Disease Outbreak Response System Condition (DORSCON) from yellow to orange on 7 February, demand and sales increased as more people started having meals at home and “loading up their pantry”, Sheng Siong remarked.
Before that, recovering consumer sentiment and the low base effect last year led to better Chinese New Year sales in Q1 compared to 2019, Sheng Siong added.
Higher sales of its house brands mainly caused gross margin to increase to 27 per cent in Q1, compared to 26.1 per cent the previous year.
Sales increased the most for non-fresh products, whose sourcing was diversified to meet the sudden increase in demand. Compared to Q1 2019, the ratio of fresh to non-fresh products stayed about the same in the first quarter.
Sheng Siong also stated that in Q1, it did not experience big disruptions in its supply chain.
The group also noted in the update: “In hindsight, our move to increase our stockholding since the end of Q4 2019 prevented serious stock-out situations, although certain heavily demanded items were depleted immediately after the first round of elevated buying.”
Sheng Siong added that it will also keep on looking for retail space in areas where it has yet to establish itself.
If it was not for the circuit breaker measures, five outlets would have been opened by Sheng Siong this year, totalling its area to around 575,160 sq ft and network to 64 outlets.
Competition will likely remain strong between online supermarkets and brick-and-mortar supermarkets, the group admitted. Future disruptions to the supply chain and the rise in prices due to lockdowns imposed in many countries amid the pandemic could occur, as warned by several international food companies.
Sheng Siong expects revenue to wither off from the higher levels now once the COVID-19 situation improves. Households will then consume the buffer stocks they have been keeping.
“In the meanwhile, we will continue to hold a higher-than-normal level of inventory as a hedge against potential disruption to the supply chain,” the company assured.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Post-pandemic: Social justice, developing moral sensibilities, and rethinking economic models need to be prioritised

“There’s a very thin sense of mutual obligation, very thin sense of…

公积金终身入息计划 提早离世遗产不含累积利息?

如果未到退休年龄就过世,您公积金户头里的钱会哪里去? 资深财务顾问暨时事评论人梁实轩,在去年八月的一篇文章表示,其友人曾向中央公积金局询问以上问题,其中一些细节令他细思极恐。 公积金局架设的”areyouready.sg”网站上,以上的问答如下: 用户离世时,其年金保费会如何处理? 您离世后,相关遗产是会遗赠给受益人。如果是公积金年长者终身入息计划(CPF LIFE),有关遗产则是会员离世后,未使用的年金保费和退休账户的余额(如果有的话)。他们都会和该用户剩余的公积金储蓄,遗赠受益人。 然而,年金保费所赚取的利息,并不构成个人会员遗产的一部分,因为它会用于支付终身收入基金(Lifelong Income Fund),让所有终身入息计划会员都能享有每月入息。 与所有年金产品一样,终身入息计划立基于风险共担的概念。为了让会员们都能享有每月入息,必须汇总年金保费的利息,然后再将有关总利息每月入息给该计划下的所有健在成员。因此,公积金终身入息年金保费所赚取的利息,将不会成为个别成员遗产的一部分。 官网回答具误导性 然而,梁实轩指出,在公积金局官网,在有关“终身入息计划-详情-了解-如果我提前离世,我会失去所有的钱吗?”的选项中,却写到:…

张素兰:对无理不公政策 公民有权批评

建屋发展局和市区重建局在本周一出台调高违例停车罚款额的政策,人权律师张素兰对该政策发表看法,认为人民行动党政府只懂得加重罚款、落实更严苛的刑罚。 “在处理违例停车问题上,却不去反省自身在规划停车位上缺乏效率,且有差别待遇,例如部长可任意停车等。” 不过,就有网民Robert Wee留言反击“难道你反对用罚款来敦促良好公民行为的手段?那么你的解决方案又是什么?” 张素兰特此撰文回应,她忆述当惹耶勒南(JB Jeyaretnam )在80年代早期成为国会里唯一的反对党议员,很多人也不客气指责他只会提问,没有建设性方案,甚至指他连课题也没研究,但他们似乎忘了,惹耶勒南是以一己之力,硬撼满堂的行动党议员。 她很遗憾,如今当她对于时事课题表达疑问,就被要求提出解决方案,否则就闭嘴。 她形容这样的态度也说明,如今群众依赖政府,以为政府做什么都是为他们好的盲从现象,不鼓励人民自己话事当家(disempowered )。 “难道我们是等着被喂饱、然后送上屠宰场的牲畜?我们甚至还不如牲畜,如果我们没钱,政府没有义务养活我们,只能依靠自己的家人,所以我们为何就不能批评自己的政府了呢?” 有权批评有害社稷的政策 他告诫Robert Wee,我们都是新加坡公民,有权评述、批评和反对任何可能对社稷有害的政策。“不幸的是,我没办法站到国会前举海报抗议,这么做会遭致牢狱之灾。所以我只能尽我所能,透过脸书表达我的异议。”…

Police car clamped for parking illegally at a private property

It’s normal to see cars being clamped by authorities. But what is…