The categorisation of COVID-19 cases between those in the Singapore “community” and those in migrant worker dormitories will potentially fuel racism and discrimination against the latter after the circuit breaker measures end, said Bernard Chen, former organising secretary for the Workers’ Party (WP) Youth Wing.
Mr Chen, the youngest candidate fielded by the WP in the 2015 General Election, said in a Facebook post yesterday (28 April) that the divisive picture painted by the categorisation will lead to the growing perception that those not “in the community” are “infectious and dangerous”.
“As migrant workers walk back into “the community”, there is bound to be doubt and suspicion hanging over them,” he said.
Singapore’s approach in handling COVID-19 cases among migrant workers, Mr Chen posited, has parallels to the colonial British “divide and rule” attitude, during which the three main races at the time — the Chinese, the Malays and the Indians — were judged to “behave very differently” from one another by the colonists.
“Post-pandemic, we can be quite certain that the migrant workers will be stamped with the “Covid-19 label” … The “if you don’t behave, the Ah pu-neh neh will catch you” advice will become, “if you don’t listen and go close to them, you will catch the virus”, said Mr Chen.
The separation of migrant workers from the rest of the Singapore community in terms of managing COVID-19, he added, also stems from the need “to isolate responsibility and celebrate our successes”.
“How selfish and arrogant can we be to continue to think that that we can be statistically separated from them?” Mr Chen questioned in a separate post.
“Our numbers may be stable, but theirs are not. And that means that we are all not well,” he said.
“Singapore can only be as strong as our weakest link. Right now, we are weak and we have much to be ashamed of,” Mr Chen lamented.

In a separate critique of a post by Critical Spectator, a sociopolitical blog run by Polish national Michael Petraeus, Mr Chen observed that migrant workers in Singapore are living a “peripheral” and “invisible” existence — except when they occasionally congregate in public places to meet fellow workers.
“But when they are literally visible, we tend to call them out for being a nuisance. The “unruliness” and the “noise” that they may create has been the narratives that form part of our crusading motivation to restore a semblance of hygiene modernity to our environs,” he said.
From the above, Singapore society had developed “a racialised perception” of the migrant workers being “dirty”, disorderly” and “violent”.
Singapore society’s “continued acceptance” of the above, Mr Chen posits, mirrors the “systematic exclusion linked to their transience”.
As a result of the normalisation of migrant workers being in the margins of Singapore society, he predicted that “there will continue to be few changes in their experiences and welfare post-pandemic”.
“Consider how we as a nation has systematically stripped away their identity and dignity, in the name of order, convenience and “how fortunate they are in having that “once-in-a-lifetime” to work in a country like Singapore,” said Mr Chen.
From the deeply ignorant article posted on Lianhe Zaobao, to the since-deleted remarks made by former minister and current PAP Member of Parliament (MP),Yaacob Ibrahim on Facebook, to how the government initially failed to cater to the migrant worker needs at the initial outbreak of the coronavirus, it is manifestly clear that they are not viewed by Singaporeans as an integral part of our society.
Leong Hoe Nam, an infectious diseases specialist from the Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre, said in a recent interview with CNA’s Talking Point that while isolating all of the migrant worker dormitories may stop the virus from spreading to the rest of Singapore, it is important to remember that they are a part of our community and not a separate and different group to be shut out.
Even from a purely pragmatic standpoint, the failure to manage the spread of COVID-19 among migrant workers will eventually backfire against a small nation such as Singapore, said Jeremy Lim, a professor and the co-director of global health at the National University of Singapore’s Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health in an interview with TIME.

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Nearly 50 million Facebook accounts hacked due to existing vulnerability on platform

Facebook users were shocked as the news spread about how nearly 50…

A*STAR scientists pioneered a molecular connection between obesity and diabetes

Singapore, 30 June 2014—Scientists from the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology…

前总检察长温长明呼吁 疫情当前责任应优先于个体自由

前总检察长温长明教授,投稿英语媒体《今日报》评论,强调新加坡在对抗冠状病毒19疫情当前,责任应优先于个人自由。有道德观念者,都不可能纵情放任,人们都要意识到,他们的行为如何影响他人。 每个道德准则,都是基于责任,而不是个人权益。这关乎“己所不欲,勿施于人”,而不是每个人都有权被善待。 他也指出,新加坡是人类有史以来,人口密度最拥挤城市,近570万人口住在这里,人口密度近于每平方公里8000人。但新加坡和其他小国不同,国人无法迁移到周边国家来逃避疫情。冠病19 疫情也凸显全球一体的概念,疫情来自一个可能大多数人闻所未闻的城市,如今却成了每个人面对的难题。 而最新的科学证明,要防控疫情,人们应尽量呆在家里,避免于他人不必要第接触。这似乎和一些人随心所欲的本能背道而驰。 在文中,温长明谈到西方国家如在德国柏林,示威者高喊“我们是人民”口号;美国还有持枪激进主义者,要从政府干预下“解放”自己的州属。 但相比下在日本,戴口罩是常见的,他们是给予社会良知,以避免传播咳嗽或感冒。 限制是为了保护他人 为何要有居家通知、戴口罩、社交距离的限制?都是为了保护他人。不幸的是有者明明需居家通知,仍执意外出。 有者可能认为,因违反居家通知,就要判入狱似乎是执法过度。但温长明分析,即便大部分社群都愿意为集体负责,但只要出现一位不负责任的超级传播者,要“行使他的自由权”,都可能引发新一波疫情,那么其他人的牺牲都要前功尽弃了。 “反社会行为,必将造成威胁集体福祉的后果。”温长明认为,法庭做出的判决有两种功能,其一是法律震慑力,避免他人以身试法;其二则是发出明确信号,且不论其他自由主义社会怎么做,但在新加坡,不负责任的态度是不被接受的。 防疫表现应看死亡率…

新西兰基督城枪击案 狮城女婿受伤紧急入院

新加坡政府医院的语言治疗师哈米玛阿玛(译音Hamimah Ahmat),在星期五早上(3月15日)登录脸书时,完全没想到会看到新西兰基督城清真寺枪击案的发生,更没想到她的丈夫也严重受伤入院。 她土耳其籍丈夫,泽科里亚突洋(译音Zekeriya Tuyan)是在基督城工作的一名信息技术(IT)人员,他每周五都会到那里其中一间清真寺进行祈祷。 哈米玛当时看到清真寺枪击案后,尝试联络丈夫,但是却没人应答。惟,她较后接到一个令人伤痛的电话,指她的丈夫,突洋先生是努尔(Al Noor)清真寺大规模扫射的数十名受害者之一。 哈米玛即刻带着两个儿子搭飞机到新西兰的基督城医院(Christchurch Hospital),他的丈夫在枪击案后因为情况危急,被紧急送入该医院的重症监护病房(ICU)就医,目前已经在慢慢康复。他们来自土耳其的亲戚当时也聚集在候诊室,希望为他们一家提供帮助。 一家人感情亲密 虽然他们是远距离婚姻,但是每年6月和12月的学校假期,他们都会尽量相聚一起。他们也常常透过Skype联络,突洋先生会教导儿子有关古兰经的内容以及商讨他们的旅游计划。他们几乎没想过自周四(3月14日)晚上的Skype通话后,他们的生活会会突来巨变。 枪击事件主谋是28岁的澳大利亚人布伦顿.塔兰特(Brenton Harrison…