• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
  • Volunteer
    • Internship with The Online Citizen
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

Dormitory Awards are seemingly meaningless and could potentially be judged in a self serving manner

by Ghui
25/04/2020
in Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
20

Tuas View Dormitory that has 854 cases of COVID-19 infection as of 24 April.

According to reports, it has come to light that the S11 dormitory which houses migrant workers has had 2,263 cases of COVID-19 as of 24 April. It has also been reported that the S11 dormitory generates approximately $70 million per annum in revenue and won a Dormitory Award in 2018.
While the Corona virus outbreak is an unprecedented event, it is somewhat at odds that a dormitory that was judged good enough to win a Dormitory Award just two years ago ends up being the largest COVID-19 cluster in Singapore?
The Guest of Honour, Zaqy Mohamad who is the Minister of State for Manpower, said, “all our winners tonight have one thing in common – they place huge emphasis on the well-being of their foreign worker residents. They take active steps to continually improve their welfare.”
This beg the questions – What is the judging criteria for this Dormitory Award and who are the judges?
According to its website, “the Dormitory Awards aims to recognise dormitory operators who exceed basic housing standards and adopt good dormitory management practices, to enhance the quality of life for foreign worker residents. It is jointly organised by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), Dormitory Association of Singapore Limited (DASL) and  Migrant Workers Centre (MWC.)”
Are the organisers truly able to represent the needs of migrant workers?
Looking at how the COVID-19 spread has spun out of control within our dormitories and criticism splashed across the international media of how our migrant workers are treated, it is arguably fair to say that the MOM  may not be the best party to champion the rights of migrant workers.
The DASL was ostensibly set up to “develop a set of standards for all dormitory association members, so that through these standards, accommodation for foreign workers are clean, hygienic and equitable to proper housing provision” 
However, a look at their team members may suggest that there is potential for self serving agendas to be developed. The President of the DASL is Mr Cheah Chi Kong, Jonathan from S11 – the very same S11 with the highest number of COVID-19 cases.
Next up is MWC which is a a bipartite initiative of the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and the Singapore National Employers’ Federation (SNEF). The NTUC is affiliated with the government while the SNEF looks after the welfare of employers (not employees).
Can each of these bodies truly be the arbiter of what constitutes an award winning dormitory?
The criteria of winning such an award is also notably vague. As set out in their website:
Criteria for dormitories regulated under Foreign Employees Dormitories Act (FEDA):

CriteriaWeightage
FW residents’ ratings of how happy they are to live at their dormitory.30%
Dormitory operator’s efforts to interact and engage with the residents.25%
Dormitory operator’s management of feedback, and improvements made in response to feedback.25%
Quality of activities offered to FWs.10%
Dormitory operator’s engagement of appointed Foreign Worker Ambassadors or influential FW leaders.5%
Dormitory operator’s efforts in providing or ensuring emotional support (e.g. counselling) for FWs who require it.5%

Criteria for dormitories not regulated under FEDA:

CriteriaWeightage
FW residents’ ratings of how happy they are to live at their dormitory.30%
Dormitory operator’s efforts to interact and engage with the residents.25%
Dormitory operator’s management of feedback, and improvements made in response to feedback.25%
Quality of amenities offered to FWs.10%
Dormitory operator’s engagement of appointed Foreign Worker Ambassadors or influential FW leaders.5%
Dormitory operator’s efforts in providing or ensuring emotional support (e.g. counselling) for FWs who require it.5%

Who determines the breakdown and what are the benchmarks for judging? Arguably, the standards could be subjective and judged in a self serving manner. And as an aside, why do we have dormitories that are not regulated under FEDA?
The results probably speak for themselves. S11, Dormitory Award 2018, S11, Largest COVID-19 Cluster 2020.
Is there any point in having such seemingly meaningless awards?

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Subscribe
Connect withD
Login
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Notify of
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Recent Posts

  • Taiwan transport minister resigns over train crash
  • S’pore economy grows 0.2% in first quarter; MAS keeps monetary policy unchanged amid low core inflation outlook
  • Netizens question how woman who abused domestic helper allowed to become prison counsellor
  • Over 100mil devices at risk from NAME:WRECK DNS bugs, CSA advise firms to patch systems immediately
  • Public member highlights lax social distancing control in airport allowing travellers to intermingle
  • 16 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; all cases are imported
  • Countries that license bicycles do it for reasons such as insurance and anti-theft, not lack of road safety compliance
  • India’s daily COVID caseload doubles in 10 days to 200,000

Trending posts

Ho Ching shares not 1, not 2, but 7 Facebook posts by Chan Chun Sing in a row within 15 minutes

Ho Ching now shares 13 Facebook posts by Lawrence Wong consecutively within 6 minutes

FB post criticising Minister Chan Chun Sing’s leadership skills re-emerges in light of recent 4G leadership discussion

Just stop with the charade; Chan is PAP’s preferred PM successor

MP Poh Li San explains to media why RSAF Super Puma was replaced with Airbus H225M

Roy Ngerng raises over S$125,000 over 7 days of fund raising to pay for PM Lee’s defamation damage

AETOS auxiliary police officer arrested for armed robbery of a moneylender in Jurong

PM Lee hopes Govt can decide on tudung issue by National Day Rally — but netizens say “S’poreans never against them wearing tudung”

Here’s why many Singaporeans aren’t bothered who the ruling party chooses to become PM

Roy Ngerng raises over S$110,000 over 6 days of fund raising to pay for PM Lee’s defamation damage

Load More
April 2020
MTWTFSS
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930 
« Mar   May »
  • About Us
  • Volunteer
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
  • Contact Us

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

wpDiscuz
20
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply