by Jing Xuan Teng with Laurie Chen in Beijing
Nestled in the hilly outskirts of Wuhan, the city at the heart of the coronavirus crisis, a Chinese high-security biosafety laboratory is now the subject of US claims it may be the cradle of the pandemic.
Chinese scientists have said the virus likely jumped from an animal to humans in a market that sold wildlife in Wuhan, but the existence of the lab has fuelled conspiracy theories that the germ spread from the facility.
The United States has now brought the allegations into the mainstream, with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo saying US officials are doing a “full investigation” into how the virus “got out into the world”.
Here are some key questions about the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV):

What is it?

The institute is home to the China Centre for Virus Culture Collection, the largest virus bank in Asia which preserves more than 1,500 strains, according to its website.
The complex contains Asia’s first maximum security lab equipped to handle Class 4 pathogens (P4) — dangerous viruses that pose a high risk of person-to-person transmission, such as Ebola.
The 300-million-yuan ($42 million) lab was completed in 2015, and finally opened in 2018, with the founder of a French bioindustrial firm, Alain Merieux, acting as a consultant in its construction.
The institute also has a P3 laboratory that has been in operation since 2012.
The 3,000-square-metre (32,000-square-foot) P4 lab, located in a square building with a cylindrical annex, lies near a pond at the foot of a forested hill in Wuhan’s remote outskirts.
On a recent visit, AFP saw no sign of activity inside.
A poster outside the complex read, “Strong Prevention and Control, Don’t Panic, Listen to Official Announcements, Believe in Science, Don’t Spread Rumours”.

Is it the source of the coronavirus?

Pompeo said Friday that Chinese authorities themselves, when they started investigating the virus, “considered whether the WIV was, in fact, the place where this came from”.
“We know they’ve not permitted the world’s scientists to go into that laboratory to evaluate what took place there, what’s happening there, what’s happening there even as we speak,” he said in a radio interview.
The Washington Post and Fox News both quoted anonymous sources who voiced concern that the virus may have come — accidentally — from the facility.
US diplomatic cables seen by The Washington Post revealed that officials were especially concerned about inadequate safety standards related to researchers’ handling of SARS-like bat coronaviruses in the high-security lab.
Fox News said the pandemic’s “patient zero” may have been infected by a strain of bat virus being studied at the facility that somehow got into the population in Wuhan.
Various conspiracy theories about the alleged origin of the coronavirus in the lab have flourished online.
The institute declined to comment on Friday, but it released a statement in February dismissing the rumours.
It said it received samples of the then-unknown virus on December 30, determined the viral genome sequence on January 2 and submitted information on the pathogen to the World Health Organization on January 11.
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian on Friday rejected allegations that the lab was responsible for the outbreak.
“A discerning person will understand at a glance that the purpose is to create confusion, divert public attention, and shirk their responsibility,” said Zhao, who himself promoted conspiracy theories the US army may have brought the virus to China.

 What do scientists know about the virus?

Scientists believe the virus originated in bats before being passed to humans through an intermediary species — possibly the endangered pangolin, whose scales are illegally trafficked in China for traditional medicine.
But a study by a group of Chinese scientists published in The Lancet in January revealed that the first COVID-19 patient had no connection to Wuhan’s infamous animal market, and neither did 13 of the first 41 confirmed cases.
Institute researcher Shi Zhengli, one of China’s leading experts on bat coronaviruses and the deputy director of the P4 lab, was part of the team that published the first study to suggest that SARS-CoV-2 came from bats.
In an interview with Scientific American, Shi said the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence did not match any of the bat coronaviruses her laboratory had previously collected and studied.
Filippa Lentzos, biosecurity researcher at King’s College London, said while there is currently no proof for the lab accident theory, there is also “no real evidence” that the virus came from the wet market.
“For me, the pandemic origin is still an open question,” Lentzos told AFP.
There are some indications “that could point to a potential lab accident from basic scientific research”, she said.
“But all of this needs considerable investigation for anyone to say anything with any certainty on the pandemic origins.”
David Heymann, professor of infectious disease epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, also said there was no evidence about its origin but it is “closely related to a bat virus”.
“There are many theories of how humans could’ve been infected, and I don’t think any of them are able to be substantiated at present.”
– AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PAP’s Zaqy Mohamad slams SDP’s Bryan Lim for “politicking post-elections” in regards to lift upgrading issues at Marsiling

The People’s Action Party’s (PAP) MP Zaqy Mohamad took to his Facebook…

Thailand may pave the way to legalising same-sex unions in Southeast Asia

Thailand may become the first country in Southeast Asia to legalise same-sex…

津贴、保险后医药费仍高 网友忧福利跟不上医疗通膨

一名网友分享友人郑瑞豪(译音)的住院经历,感叹老百姓虽然花钱买保险、还公积金保健储蓄(Medisave),然而真正需要时,获得赔偿额仍难以应付日益高涨的医药费。此事引起网民纷纷留言热议,认识到现有医疗津贴制和保险的局限。 该名网友以此事为例,认为在重度残障情况下,终身护保每月只赔600新元仍有不足,即使无病无痛,最后仍难以索回保费。特别是未来医疗费逐年调涨,我们的公积金、终身健保是否能减轻我们的负担? 郑瑞豪在2018年二月26日,突发心脏病和心脏骤停,在陈笃生医院接受治疗。有两天必须躺在加护病房,随后三天转到普通病房,并接受了气球血管扩张手术(PCI)和植入支架。 他说,政府只津贴1万4000元,终身健保则津贴了1万元,然而自己仅能从公积金保健储蓄(Medisave)提取4千073元,扣了上述数额,自己仍必须承担约1万3千元的医药费。 郑瑞豪在帖文中叹,自己的医药费并没有获得政府津贴65巴仙,医疗储蓄至少有5万2千积蓄,但在当下生死关头,却无用武之地。 一名网友还质疑此贴文的真伪,因为我国公民享用政府医院服务,不论住C级病房或手术,理应至少能得65巴仙津贴,不过郑瑞豪亲自解释,也将当时的医疗收据上载,给众网友评评理:他确确实实为整个治疗服了1万3千余元的医疗费。 郑瑞豪说,完整收据有6页,问题关键不在于每个单一事项,是否获65巴仙津贴,而是在总数额,能够获得多少津贴。“C级病房也没有电视、个人卫生用品和冷气等,我还要请家人带我的个人餐具和杯子。可是一晚住宿在津贴后,仍要价212元,即便是五星级酒店都没那么贵!” 网民Kumar则分享时事评论家Andrew Loh在2016年的境遇:接受血管造影侦测,和诊断是否适合进行血管扩张手术,医药费达1万0727新元。这笔费用或政府津贴6千767.90新元(约65巴仙),终身健保偿还720元,再扣除部分保健储蓄,Andrew先生只需付2千248新元。 至于Andrew的另一心脏绕道手术要价2万5千554新元,政府津贴高达80巴仙即2万0664元;Andrew再用终身健保偿还4千909元,剩余的380元只需用保健储蓄偿还,他根本不需再自掏腰包出一分钱。 (CGH=樟宜中央医院;KTPH=邱德拔医院;NHC=国家心脏中心;NTFGH=黄廷芳综合医院;NUH=国立大学医院;TTSH=陈笃生医院。图源来自卫生部官网) 政府提供基础安全网…