Following the introduction of the circuit breaker measures on 3 April, the Multi-Ministry Task Force formed to helm the government’s efforts in combatting the COVID-19 pandemic was asked in a briefing why the country has not yet moved from DORSCON Orange to DORSCON Red.
The reporter who asked the question opined that the guidelines for that category include closures of schools and workplaces which were announced as part of this month-long circuit breaker period.
The question was post to the ministers during that briefing on 3 April for their current definition of DORSCON Red in this situation and how far or near Singapore might be to imposing a lockdown.
The country’s Disease Outbreak Response System Condition (DORSCON) is a framework used to guide the way the country deals with and manages outbreaks. On 7 February, the level was raised to Orange, one level below Red which is the highest most urgent code used in cases of pandemics that are out of control.
In response to the question during the briefing earlier this month, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong had said that DORSCON Red would mean that there are “many uncontrollable outbreaks” and “widespread community transmission” which makes contact tracing, containment, and quarantine “difficult to do”.
He continued, “We are not in DORSCON red because we have not given up on contact tracing, we have not given up on containment, on quarantine.”
In fact, Mr Gan said, the government is doing the opposite by stepping up capacity in order to do more contact tracing in order to ’ring-fence’ the transmission to contain it and reduce the number of new and unlinked cases.
Mr Gan continued, “So I think we are not yet in DORSCON Red, we are quite a distance from DORSCON Red. We have to focus on the immediate task of increasing a safe distances among our population and stepping up our containment efforts through contact tracing and through containment.”
Chiming in, Associate Professor Kenneth Mak, director of medical services at the Ministry of Health (MOH) elaborated that DORSCON is a risk assessment of the local situation, looking at the degree of community spread and the country’s ability to control the spread.
Prof Mak noted that while there is an increase in community spread at the time as opposed to the previous month, he still believes that the situation can be potentially controlled.
He said, “If we were to consider DORSCON red, it will be in a situation where because of our inability or failure to ring-fence, isolate, contain and prevent further community spread, then the thrust of our strategy changes towards some level of mitigation in order to make sure that our health system and resources are sustainable in the long haul.”
“We are clearly not at that stage yet,” he added.
Prof Mak went on to describe the parameters that are considered to determine the risk of community spread. These include the number of cases, whether those cases are linked to existing clusters or unlinked, the ability to prevent further spread within a cluster, and ensuring no further transmissions occur after attempting to ring-fence and isolate the cluster.
Now, that was about three weeks ago on. However, it seems that the MOH has stopped announcing the details of new infected cases as of yesterday, after recording a daily high of 1,426 new cases on Monday (20 April).
The annex shown in MOH’s daily report only includes a summary of the cases with no details of those infected as it was shown in previous updates.


The situation reports published by MOH similarly do not show how many cases in migrant worker dormitories are unlinked.

Is this an indication that the government has indeed given up on contact tracing?

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国内再传医院牙科诊所误用未完全消毒器具事件

陈笃生医院牙科诊所,被指在至少八名病患身上,曾使用未经过最后阶段消毒的牙科器具。 这也是自去年,全国牙科中心出现类似疏失后,第二次有医院发生使用未完全消毒牙科器具的疏忽。类似疏失重演令卫生部感到失望。 陈笃生医院发声明指出,他们在牙科诊所发现,有八套牙科器具,没有经过第四个、即蒸汽消毒的步骤。 而受影响的病患是在上月28日至本月5日之间,到该医院牙科诊所就医。 院方称已完成前三消毒步骤,感染风险非常低 作为预防措施,陈笃生医院牙科诊所的一些治疗程序从12月8日起已经暂停。院方已实施更多管控措施,提高工作人员的意识,强调有关全面遵守护理程序的重要性。部分门诊牙科服务将从明日起起陆续恢复。 不过院方进一步解释,牙科器具一般会经过四个步骤的清洗消毒,这八包牙科器具,已完成之前三个步骤的消毒,近乎百分百消毒,因此病患受传染风险非常低。 院方表示,他们通知了在同期间到诊所接受治疗的575个病患,向他们解答他们的担忧。 卫生部则勒令国立健保集团和陈笃生医院,加强管制措施,和检讨有关疏忽。卫生部长颜金勇则表示,该部讲研究此事件,并考虑采取进一步行动,以降低整个医疗领域再次发生类似事件的风险。 去年6月12日,我国最大的全国牙科中心,被揭发至少在72名病患身上,使用未完全消毒的牙科器具。当月到该牙科中心看诊的病患,就多大714人。 事件发生后,卫生部针对所有有牌公立和私立医疗机构的中央消毒供应部门(CSSD)进行审查,以评估是否符合规定的消毒程序。经审计结果显示,所有消毒程序都达标。

21 May 1987

Andrew Loh / On 21 May 1987, a group of social workers…

被国大指违反行为准则 郑永年:那是礼节性西式拥抱!

今年9月4日,新加坡国立大学东亚研究所前所长郑永年,透过代表律师许廷芳发表声明,断然否认所有性骚扰的指控,也指警方发出的严厉警告,“并没有构成罪责或事实的裁断”。 新加坡国立大学在本月17日公布内部调查结果,指郑永年在工作会议上,未经同意拥抱东亚所女职员,专业上是不恰当的,违反了国大职员行为守则。 不过,郑永年透过代表律师许廷芳发出声明。他指出,2018年5月30日,与有关女职员会晤,准备送客时,女职员提出想和郑的女儿交朋友。 郑永年告知女儿不在新加坡,女职员露失望之情,他因此礼节性给了她西式拥抱,只用右手拍了她的肩膀,以示安慰和感谢。 郑永年的声明以第一人称叙述:“我的左手臂患有肩周炎,所以我只是用右手臂拍了她的肩膀。”他强调,和女职员没不恰当身体接触。 郑指出,他拒绝担任女职员的博士课程导师,近一年后,后者才报警指控他;郑声称,期间女职员多次主动向他示好,但他都没特别回应。他也指受到女职员在媒体上的人身攻击。 郑永年更批评,国大在声明中,继续对涉案女职员提供支持,“感到遗憾和不解”。 “为什么不保护为它工作20多年的本校教授?难道在这段期间,一个诬告者对我在工作上和精神上造成的困扰和压力,就不在大学考虑的范围内吗?” 郑永年被指控,在2018年5月9日,在一个会议上,将手放在东亚研究所一名女职员的肩膀和头上。 第二项指控:2018年5月30日在会议上,拥抱女职员,并拍臀部 第三项指控:2018年10月在拍群体照时,撑住东亚研究所职员的背部。 郑永年在11月17日的声明中,也反驳女职员的第一和第三项指控不实。对于第一项指控,郑声称当天他们无任何身体接触。至于2018年10月21日集体拍照,当时妻子就站在他与女职员中间。照片显示,他手臂被妻子肩膀遮挡,不可能绕过妻子触碰该职员的背。…

SPP’s Osman Sulaiman embarks on the Purple Ribbon Project, pledges to assist people to be debt-free

Aiming to assist people who struggle with debt issues, Singapore People’s Party…