The Singapore Police Force (SPF) have rejected claims which stated that they have fined people at road blocks for not complying with the elevated safe distancing measures.
The Police said this in a Facebook post on Monday (13 April) after messages asserting the claims had been making rounds on text messaging platforms.
“There are messages circulating via text messaging services making false claims that members of the public had been stopped at police road blocks and fined for not complying with the elevated safe distancing measures,” SPF noted.
It added, “This is not true. The Police have not conducted road blocks specifically to enforce the elevated safe distancing measures, and no passengers have been fined at road blocks for not complying with these measures.”
On top of the text messages that SPF highlighted in its statement, TODAY also reported that it had viewed the messages circulating on platforms like WhatsApp making the same false claims.
In one of the messages on WhatsApp, an individual pointed out that a friend’s son had been fined S$300 for dropping off a friend home.
“He was stopped during a roadblock and they (the police) checked both their Identity Cards (ICs) which apparently didn’t match within the same household,” the message read.
Although SPF clarified that they did not fine people at road blocks, but they did note that they may take enforcement on those that disobey the safe distancing measures if they spot them.
The Police added that the road blocks that they have been carrying out are to detect other offences like driving under the influence of alcohol or to look for wanted individuals.
“The Police conduct road blocks to detect offences such as for drink-driving, and other law enforcement purposes, such as to detect wanted persons,” SPF explained.
It added, “Nevertheless, if the Police come across motorists and passengers flouting the elevated safe distancing measures when conducting such road blocks, the Police may take enforcement action.”
The Police also added that the public should not “spread unsubstantiated information which may cause public alarm.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Is SMRT implying that the noise level is a constraint on increasing train trips?

by: Leong Sze Hian/ I refer to media reports (“Increased frequency of…

Legal Aid Bureau to revamp website to speed up the process for those in need

The Legal Aid Bureau (LAB), which is under the purview of the…

Security bonds encourage “xenophobia and classism” – H.O.M.E

The Online Citizen speaks to Jolovan Wham, a social worker with H.O.M.E…

内政部否认歧视本地死囚

44岁新加坡男子苏海(Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin),因面对贩毒罪名成立,原定于上周五(18日)执行绞刑。 不过苏海成功向上诉庭提呈上诉,以进行司法检讨,直至上诉庭聆聆审,前者的执刑将暂缓。 苏海是透过代表律师拉维(M Ravi)提呈司法检讨,申诉公民似乎面对不平等对待。因为冠病疫情关系,一些外籍囚犯的家属由于无法来狮城探访死囚,他们的处刑获押后。但其他死囚如新加坡死囚则可能先被安排上绞刑台。 上诉庭在本月22日聆审苏海的上诉。据拉维的脸书更新贴文,坦言庭上交锋激烈,上诉庭要求总检察署和辩方都要再提呈进一步的陈述。下一次的聆讯定在10月7日。 针对苏海的申诉,内政部还特别发文告,否认在处刑的排期上存歧视成分。不论是外籍囚犯或本国公民, 若试过了所有法律或特赦上诉途径,才会被安排处刑。 当局也指出,2019年进行了四次司法处刑,就包括两名新加坡公民和两名外籍人士,也指苏海的指控毫无根据。…