Associate Professor at the National University of Singapore, Ben Leong published a lengthy note on Facebook on 11 April in support of the Ministry of Education (MOE)’s decision to suspend the use of Zoom in home-based learning, adding that teachers have been given a comprehensive list of guidelines to conduct the online classes.
Recently on 10 April, the MOE announced that schools will suspend the use of the video conferencing application Zoom for home-based learning after an online class was hijacked and students were shown pornographic content by two Caucasian hackers.
Following that, Assoc Prof Leong – who worked with the MOE for five years until 30 June 2009 – posted a note on Facebook on 11 April claiming that he became the “complaint central” for the MOE as irate teachers and parents wrote to him to complain about the matter.
In his Facebook note, he explained how the Zoom works and seems to express zero concern about the application’s security.
“Everything else that people can steal, Facebook has probably already stolen. Students how? Well, when they login, they just need a link. They can call themselves “Mickey Mouse” or “Donald Trump” and I wouldn’t know better. What can I do? All I can do is boot them from the class if they don’t comply with my instructions to use a “real name,” so I doubt there’s much to leak,” said Assoc Prof Leong.
He further asserted, “As a teacher, do I have any concerns about Zoom security? No.”
Commenting on the MOE’s announcement to suspend Zoom for home-based learning, he understood why it has caused panic among the teachers as they spent great effort in learning about the application.
“At this point, you would conclude like me (then) that MOE doesn’t know what it’s doing and over-reacted. This is a common view of the teachers on the ground who understand how to use the tool. The angst is that one teacher messes up, MOE over-reacts and the other 37,999 suffer,” he remarked.
Noting that his former colleagues are not at liberty to publicly discuss the matter, he explained the situation on their behalf and compared the home-based learning with the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF)’s Training and Safety Regulations (TSR).
“SAF has this thing called TSR (Training and Safety Regulations). Everyone must take the test,” he said. “Still people get heat stroke and die. Actually dun have to ask, 99% is non-compliance of lawful order. But if someone dies, SAF still must suspend training and investigate what (even if it’s patently obviously it’s because someone did something they should not that is already covered by some rule in the TSR).”
According to Assoc Prof Leong, teachers have been given a comprehensive list of guidelines to conduct the home-based learning and the Zoom sessions were already being set up by default but the teacher probably had used personal device instead of using the Schools Standard ICT Operating Environment (SSOE) device provided by the MOE.
“Teachers have already been issued this comprehensive list of guidelines, which sadly, TL;DR people don’t read or missed some parts. If the teachers use the MOE-issued SSOE laptops, I was told that the Zoom sessions already locked down by default (probably explains why investigation had to be done. Likely teacher was using his/her personal device),” he added.
He urged teachers to be kind to the MOE headquarters as they worked overtime on a public holiday to wrap up the investigation and to circulate an advisory the next day so the home-based learning can still proceed on Monday.
“HQ sometimes might fall short, but in this particular instance, people have all tried to do their jobs as best as they can — and as far as I can tell, they cannot be faulted. If MOE did nothing after the incident was reported, you can also imagine the kind of flak that MOE would receive,” Assoc Prof Leong noted.
Nevertheless, he opined that the teacher should not be punished for non-compliance of a lawful order as the teacher could be struggling to cope with technology and traumatized by the incident. He then shared the challenges he faced when teaching online in the past six years.
Assoc Prof Leong concluded the note by urging people to be more patient during this period of time as the MOE and teachers are working hard to provide good education to the children amid the imposition of the “circuit breaker” measures.
https://www.facebook.com/notes/ben-leong/in-defence-of-moe-and-hbl/10157333861342549/

Some netizens criticized the MOE’s decision to change the system

Although many netizens agreed with Assoc Prof Leong’s points of view and praised him for explaining the context of home-based learning, some netizens criticized the MOE’s decision to change the teaching system.
One netizen voiced his concern about the schools using platforms such as Google Classroom, Class Dojo, Zoom and others, as many parents are not savvy enough in using technology and teachers had to rush for last-minute instructions. He also questioned if the system is sustainable.

Another netizen, however, pointed out that there were no clear guidelines given to the teachers and noted that home-based learning is not like TSR at all. The netizen also suggested that the MOE should work with Google and Zoom to enhance their features and security.

A netizen pointed out the uses of other devices such as webcam and laptop to replicate classroom teaching, so the teacher gets to see the students virtually. The netizen also indicated the suspension of Zoom was the MOE’s move to show the public how serious they would take such issues.

Meanwhile, a netizen who happens to be a teacher until July 2019 also commented that it was not the teachers’ fault for being unable to transit to home-based learning in short notice. She also noted the MOE encouraged students to be “future-ready” but the HQ itself failed to foresee the problems with home-based learning.

One netizen pointed out that the preparation work for home-based learning can take three times the amount of workload, and preparing for a Zoom lesson is difficult as teachers need to ensure the materials are being saved in a convenient yet secure place for the students to download.
He also suggest the use of Discord which is much advanced than Zoom, with more features that is beneficial to the teachers conducting lessons.

 
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

延迟缴交所得税、吁业者减免租金 商业产业主今年免产业税

副总理兼财长王瑞杰称,在“坚韧财案”配套下,给予企业协助,公司与自雇人士可延后三个月缴所得税。企业可至7月才开始缴交;自雇人士八月开始缴交。 金融管理局(MAS)将与金融机构合作,让有需求的企业延迟偿还贷款一年,政府也将拨出200亿元作为借贷资本。 此外,金管局与银行和保险业这合作,探讨协助那些面对现金流问题的企业和个人。疫情期间有者无法履行法律义务,他们所支付的押金也将被没收,政府也将探讨此问题。 王瑞杰称企业融资计划(贸易贷款)(EFS –Trade Loan)下,可贷款金额从500万元提高至1千万元;贷款保险计划(Loan Insurance Scheme)下,企业的贷款保险费津贴也将从50巴仙,调升至80巴仙。 ,临时过渡贷款计划(TBLP)下,企业可申请贷款额从100万元,增加至500万元。 中小型企业在流动资金贷款计划(SME Working Capital…

Former GIC Chief-economist questions Chan Chun Sing’s apparent downplaying of Govt’s actual role in alleviating socioeconomic inequality

Former Chief Economist at GIC and former adjunct professor at the Lee…

前学生在美国认罪 黄靖“感到高兴”

7月24日,美国司法部宣称, 新加坡籍男子姚俊威(前译杨俊伟),承认自2015年至2019年期间,以顾问公司为掩护,替中国向美政府及军方人员套取情报。 新加坡内政部则在26日答复媒体询问时表示,姚俊威所为,目前未对新加坡安全构成直接威胁。 另一方面,我国外交部前常任秘书比拉哈里,指姚俊威在2015年入学后,其导师就包括中国籍学者黄靖,后者在三年前被指试图影响新加坡舆论,而被驱逐出境。 据彭博社报导,黄靖证实几年前确实教过姚俊威。姚俊威2015年在新加坡国立大学李光耀公共政策学院就读博士学位。 根据《南华早报》报导,黄靖指出,姚俊威只是其他系成员转介给他的,后者也是他所监督的六位博士生之一,也是表现最差的。 不过,对于比拉哈里指控黄靖就是中方“代理人”,也招拢了姚俊威,黄靖则驳斥,并要求前者拿出证据,否则就要收回上述言论。 如今黄靖是北京语言文化大学国家与地区研究所的特聘教授兼系主任,对于前学生被美国逮捕、并在最近认罪,黄靖竟表示“感到惊讶,却很高兴他被抓了”! 当被询及是否知道中方常利用学生从国外套取消息,黄靖表示不熟悉这类事件,也不认为这些都是公开的。 他对姚俊威的看法:“他给我的印象是既害羞又谦虚。但他也渴望出头……那种自我重要感。在那之后,我对他的印象并不多。” 另一方面,中国外交部发言人王文斌指责美方执法部门“不断炒作中国渗透”,也反指每房在全球都有搞间谍活动。 曾经是李光耀公共政策学院亚洲和全球化研究所所长的黄靖,曾经在我国居住近十年。…

Retrenched PMET driving for a living says he can’t afford to spend his last days in Singapore

Jeffrey Khoo, Deputy Organising Secretary of the Progress Singapore Party, recently shared his encounter and conversation with a local driver on his Facebook page. In his post, Mr Khoo recounted how he took a ride to attend a meeting in town, and during their conversation, he learned that the driver was formerly a seasoned PMET as well. Difficulty to find job, main reason for rejection was “too old” Despite actively seeking job opportunities, the driver faced difficulty securing employment due to ageism. “For the companies that interviewed him, the main reason for rejection was that he was too old.” Although it is already a common story these days, what caught Jeffrey’s attention was the driver’s deep disappointment in not being able to retire in Singapore due to the high cost of living.