The government’s seemingly piecemeal dissemination of information and directives in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic has most definitely led to confusion on the part of the authorities as to how to police the new rules.
From what a F&B workers Mabel Ng wrote on her Facebook post, it would appear that essential workers are left with nowhere to have their lunch apart from the toilet!

She wrote, “Its now against the law to eat anywhere you could get caught and perhaps fined, putting all of us F and B frontliners in a tight spot when it comes to our lunch breaks.”
How is that fair?
They are out there risking their lives to provide an essential service and yet we are asking them to eat in the toilet? Why are the authorities enforcing government directives without the use of common sense?
Ng ended up having to eat her lunch in the toilet of another mall after being chased out by security when she was eating her lunch in front of her own stall!

She says that there has been some “blind implementation” of the rules. The rules are clearly to stop people from loitering unnecessarily and not to prevent people who are doing front line work from having their lunch!
This seemingly illogical means of enforcement could be in large part down to confusion as to what the rules actually entail leading authorities to err on the side of caution and throw logic to the wayside.
It is appalling and ridiculous that people who are working at essential jobs despite the outbreak of COVID-19 have nowhere to eat when we should be celebrating and praising them for their sacrifice!
This kind of policing sends out the wrong message and could end up bringing down the morale of those who still have to go out and work.
Yesterday, Ministry of Health clarified that Taxi drivers and food delivery riders can eat at public spaces or in their vehicles if it is not practical for them to head home for meals. That was days after the ban to dine in at eateries and hawker centres kicked in on the 7 April, with many stating that they did not know where to eat during their shifts. A photo showing a taxi driver eating from the back of his taxi, pained many Singaporeans who know how hard is it to drive for long hours especially now, where there is little to no customers to pick up.
To prevent further incidences of “brainless” enforcement, perhaps a government minister could speak out in praise of such essential workers and categorically state that these “no dining in” policies are meant for customers not workers!
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Former Minister S Dhanabalan resigned over detention of Marxist Conspirators?

“We had a difference and the whole Cabinet knew,” former Cabinet Minister…

读者强调国会直播乃公共服务 让选民监督议员表现

日前,有读者在媒体投书,公开呼吁新加坡国会应进行直播,让国民有机会观看完整的国会议事。 对此,傅海燕新闻秘书 Michele Khoo则在5月15日回函,认为新加坡人希望他们的心声受到讨论和在国会得到回答,因此直播下,“公共表演的成分无可避免”。 她强调国会是认真议事的平台,国会辩论可以激烈但言辞需清醒,议员需应对议题和其复杂性,避免在国会中“装腔作势”。因此国会无意进行现场直播,而改变国会议事的氛围。 很快就有民众投书回应打脸。名为Isaac Tan BaoRong的读者,在《今日报》发表看法,直言对于傅海燕新闻秘书的“表演平台论”感到困惑。 这位读者也是独立剧评家,直言只要有某人在做某事、而有旁人在看,就具备一定的表演呈现元素。但他本身完全支持国会直播,特别是网络直播。 他表示,能理解安排专门的国会电视直播频道不太实际,但同样,傅海燕新闻秘书称国会电视直播需求量低,但她也回避了网络的浏览量。 这位读者强调,国会现场直播,乃是公共服务,且不应与有没有收视率混为一谈。“政府理应让公民有机会区监督他们的议员和国会议事,至于如何善用直播应取决于民。” 留下一份完整的国会议事记录,方便民众在任何时候都可查看。只有逐字讲稿的议事记录,未能完整呈现议员在国会表现的全貌和辩论氛围。…

印尼失守出现两起确诊病例 当地也掀抢购潮

昨日(2日),印尼总统佐科维亲自证实,该国出现首两起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例。 根据《雅加达邮报》报导,两名当地人,64岁和31岁的印尼母女,曾与一名日本游客有近接触,该名日籍人士到过印尼,在上月27日,在马来西亚确诊。 此消息也引起当地民众恐慌,印尼出现抢购潮,一些超市甚至出现粮食、肉类、米等全被扫清的现象,十分夸张。 当地人拍摄民众在超市排队等候结账,购物车上满满都是各种食粮或日用品。 上月,贸工部长陈振声出席一项闭门会议,当时他曾揶揄一小撮新加坡人,在政府提升警戒级别后,就到超市疯抢日用品囤货、抢购口罩的行为“下衰”,认为这是“白痴”(idiots)行径。 陈振声更直言:“每个人都可以表现得像白痴,但是新加坡人不可以。” 事实上,疫情当下出现抢购潮,不仅曾发生在我国,其他也传出疫情的先进国如韩国、日本、意大利,也出现有民众扫货囤积粮食的现象。

苏睿勇再次向奥委会发出律师信函 拒绝奥委会两项要求

我国马拉松名将苏睿勇再次向奥委会发出律师信函,表示无法理解奥委会“延期至下周回复“的行为,并拒绝对方不公开往来信件内容的要求。 苏睿勇近日因东南亚运动会落选而与新加坡国家奥林匹克委员会(SNOC),以及新加坡田径总会(SA)争执,奥委会指出苏睿勇作为国家代表和青年运动员的典范,却表现出“不符合该委会期望的态度和行为”,同时新加坡田径总会表示已“暂时”把苏睿勇封锁在总会的聊天群组和社媒平台外,包括whatsapp、脸书、推特和Instagram等,避免后者在这些平台发文,带来负面影响。 而苏睿勇于8月7日向两协会发律师信函,指控他们在未举办任何听证会或给他辩护的机会,已“违反自然公义的基本原则”, 并要求两人于8月13日下午5点前给出具体解释,为何将他排除出2019年东南亚运动会新加坡代表团参赛阵容。 翌日,奥委会透过律师回复苏睿勇并向苏睿勇提出两项要求:1. 他们将在“下周结束前“回复苏睿勇的问题;2. 他们要求苏睿勇不再公开双方之间的细项。 苏睿勇8月11日于个人部落格上发文表示10日再次向奥委会发出律师信函,拒绝奥委会两项要求。 文内表示,“我们无法理解为何主办方需要一整个星期来回应,对于排出参选东南亚运动会阵容的理由应记录在案。“ 另外,文中也指出拒绝私底下解决问题的行为,“我们相信奥委会在未提出具体事件时,已公开谴责我作为一名运动员却表现出“不符合该委会期望的态度和行为”,他们应该能够针对以上指控,以及主观地筛选成员的行为,在公开的场合下作出解释。 苏睿勇也坚信,只有公开所有过程,才能确保奥委会维持最高标准的问责制。 日前本社报导,新加坡运动选手将在今年11月30日,赴菲律宾马尼拉出征2019年东南亚运动会。但是,2015、2017年东运会马拉松冠军得主苏睿勇,却无缘在这场体育盛事角逐金牌。…